Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T19:19:38.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multisensory Nudging: A Design Intervention for Sustainable Hand-Washing Behavior in Public Space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The scarce availability of water in highly populated cities is about to become a social problem. While the water service companies work on improving the distribution network in order to reduce losses, it is evident that one of the main problems is due to an excess of use of this resource by users. This consumption is relatively controlled when excessive consumption is clearly associated, in the consumer mind, with high costs. However, when users are in public places they tend to consume water because of a loss of correlation with costs. In this paper, we describe the design of a device to be installed in public environments, which aims to reduce the consumption of water. The device measures in real time the flow of water and sends the user visual and sound information trying to create a link between consumption and costs. The device has been installed in a university campus bathroom and has been tested. Test results show a reduction in water consumption, especially in the interactive prototype approach compared to the conventional treatment. Further modifications for future development of the interactive device is also discussed.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Albertarelli, S., Fraternali, P., Herrera, S., Melenhorst, M., Novak, J., Pasini, C., Rizzoli, A.E. and Rottondi, C. (2018), “A survey on the design of gamified systems for energy and water sustainability”, Games, Vol. 9, No. 3, p. 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/g9030038Google Scholar
Arroyo, E., Bonanni, L. and Selker, T. (2005), “Waterbot: exploring feedback and persuasive techniques at the sink”, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Portland, Oregon, USA, 2nd – 7th April 2005, ACM, pp. 631639. http://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055059Google Scholar
Biswas, A. and Kirchherr, J. (2012), “Water prices in europe need to rise substantially to encourage more sustainable water consumption”, LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) Blog. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/50167/ 22nd March 2019.Google Scholar
Cramer, W., Guiot, J., Fader, M., Garrabou, J., Gattuso, J.-P., Iglesias, A., Lange, M. A., Lionello, P., Llasat, M. C., Paz, S., Peñuelas, J., Snoussi, M., Toreti, A., Tsimplis, M. N. and Xoplaki, E. (2018), “Climate change and interconnected risks to sustainable development in the mediterranean”, Nature Climate Change, Vol. 8, pp. 972980. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0299-2Google Scholar
Gifford, R. and Nilsson, A. (2014), “Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review”, International Journal of Psychology, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 141157.Google Scholar
Gilg, A. and Barr, S. (2006), “Behavioural attitudes towards water saving? evidence from a study of environmental actions”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 400414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.010Google Scholar
Handgraaf, M. J., de Jeude, M. A. V. L. and Appelt, K. C. (2013), “Public praise vs. private pay: Effects of rewards on energy conservation in the workplace”, Ecological Economics Vol. 86, pp. 8692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.11.008Google Scholar
Holmes, T. G. (2007), Eco-visualization: combining art and technology to reduce energy consumption, in Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI conference on Creativity & cognition, Washington, DC, USA, 13th – 15th, June 2007, ACM, pp. 153162. http://doi.org/10.1145/1254960.1254982Google Scholar
Hunter, Lori M., Hatch, A. and Johnson, A. (2004), “Cross-national gender variation in environmental behaviors”, Social science quarterly, Vol. 85, No. 3, pp. 677694. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00239Google Scholar
https://www.amphiro.com/ (Last checked 19 March 2019).Google Scholar
https://supermariobros.io/ (Last checked 19 March 2019).Google Scholar
https://water.usgs.gov/edu/ (Last checked 19 March 2019).Google Scholar
Jorgensen, B., Graymore, M. and O'Toole, K. (2009), “Household water use behavior: An integrated model”, Journal of environmental management, Vol. 91, No. 1, pp. 227236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.08.009Google Scholar
Kappel, K. and Grechenig, T. (2009), “Show-me: water consumption at a glance to promote water conservation in the shower”, in Proceedings of the 4th international conference on persuasive technology, Claremont, California, USA, 26th – 29th April 2009, ACM, p. 26. https://doi.org/10.1145/1541948.1541984Google Scholar
Kim, B. (2015), “Designing Gamification in the Right Way”, in Kim, B. Library Technology Reports, ALA TechSource, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 1018.Google Scholar
Kuznetsov, S. and Paulos, E. (2010), “Upstream: motivating water conservation with low-cost water flow sensing and persuasive displays”, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA, United States, ACM, 10th – 15th April 2010, pp. 18511860. http://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753604Google Scholar
Laschke, M., Hassenzahl, M., Diefenbach, S. and Tippkämper, M. (2011), “With a little help from a friend: a shower calendar to save water”, in CHI'11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 07th – 12th May 2011, ACM, pp. 633646. http://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979659Google Scholar
Laugwitz, B., Held, T. and Schrepp, M. (2008), “Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire”, in Symposium of the Austrian HCI and Usability Engineering Group, Springer, pp. 6376.Google Scholar
Lilley, D. (2009), “Design for sustainable behaviour: strategies and perceptions”, Design Studies Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 704720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2009.05.001Google Scholar
Montazeri, S., Panos, P., Rich, G. et al. (2015), “Design for behavior change: An elaboration-based approach to persuasion in product design”, in DS 80-11 Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15), Milan, Italy, 27th–30th July 2015, pp. 001010.Google Scholar
Natale, M.J., (2002), “The Effect of a Male-oriented Computer Gaming Culture on Careers in the Computer Industry”, in SIGCAS Comput. Soc., ACM, pp. 2431. https://doi.org/10.1145/566522.566526Google Scholar
Sunstein, C., Thaler, R. (2008), “Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness”, Constitutional Political Economy, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 356360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-008-9056-2Google Scholar
Tiefenbeck, V., Wörner, A., Schöb, S., Fleisch, E. and Staake, T. (2018), “Real-time feedback promotes energy conservation in the absence of volunteer selection bias and monetary incentives”, Nature Energy, Vol. 4, pp. 3541.Google Scholar
Winn, J. and Heeter, C., (2009), “Gaming, gender, and time: Who makes time to play?”, in Sex roles, Springer, Vol. 61, No. 1-2, pp. 113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9595-7Google Scholar