Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T22:33:00.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimization Approaches in Design for Additive Manufacturing

Part of: Design for Additive Manufacturing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Stefano Rosso ,
Gianpaolo Savio ,
Federico Uriati ,
Roberto Meneghello  and
Gianmaria Concheri

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Nowadays, topology optimization and lattice structures are being re-discovered thanks to Additive Manufacturing technologies, that allow to easily produce parts with complex geometries.

The primary aim of this work is to provide an original contribution for geometric modeling of conformal lattice structures for both wireframe and mesh models, improving previously presented methods. The secondary aim is to compare the proposed approaches with commercial software solutions on a piston rod as a case study.

The central part of the rod undergoes size optimization of conformal lattice structure beams diameters using the proposed methods, and topology optimization using commercial software tool. The optimized lattice is modeled with a NURBS approach and with the novel mesh approach, while the topologically optimized part is manually remodeled to obtain a proper geometry. Results show that the lattice mesh modelling approach has the best performance, resulting in a lightweight structure with smooth surfaces and without sharp edges at nodes, enhancing mechanical properties and fatigue life.

Keywords

Additive ManufacturingOptimisationCase studyLattice structuresModeling approaches
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 809 - 818
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Altair (2018), Altair Inspire: The Future of Simulation-Driven Design. Available at: https://solidthinking.com/product/inspire/ (Accessed: 9 November 2018).Google Scholar
Bendsøe, M. P. (1989), “Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem”, Structural Optimization. Springer, Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 193–202.Google Scholar
Bendsoe, M. P. and Sigmund, O. (2013), Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Bendsøe, M. P. and Sigmund, O. (1999), “Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization”, Archive of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 69 No. 9, pp. 635–654. http://doi.org/10.1007/s004190050248.Google Scholar
Brackett, D., Ashcroft, I. and Hague, R. (2011), “Topology optimization for additive manufacturing”, in Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX. S, pp. 348–362.Google Scholar
Cagan, J. et al. (2005), “A framework for computational design synthesis: model and applications”, Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering. ASME, Vol. 5 No. 3, p. 171. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.2013289.Google Scholar
Catmull, E. and Clark, J. (1978), “Recursively generated B-spline surfaces on arbitrary topological meshes”, Computer-Aided Design. Elsevier, Vol. 10 No. 6, pp. 350–355. http://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4485(78)90110-0.Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, A. (2002), Engineering Design Synthesis: Understanding, Approaches, and Tools.10.1007/978-1-4471-3717-7Google Scholar
Han, Y. and Lu, W. F. (2018), “A novel design method for nonuniform lattice structures based on topology optimization”, Journal of Mechanical Design. ASME, Vol. 140 No. 9, pp. 91403–91410. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040546.Google Scholar
Holmström, J. et al. (2010), “Rapid manufacturing in the spare parts supply chain”, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 687–697. http://doi.org/10.1108/17410381011063996.Google Scholar
Kirsch, U. (1993), Problem Statement - Structural Optimization: Fundamentals and Applications, in Kirsch, U. (ed.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 1–56. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84845-2_1.Google Scholar
Koziel, S. and Ogurtsov, S. (2014), “Numerically Efficient Approach to Simulation-Driven Design of Planar Microstrip Antenna Arrays by Means of Surrogate-Based Optimization - Solving Computationally Expensive Engineering Problems”, in Koziel, S., Leifsson, L. and Yang, X.-S. (eds). Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 149–170.Google Scholar
Liu, J. et al. (2018), “Current and future trends in topology optimization for additive manufacturing”, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 57 No. 6, pp. 2457–2483. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1994-3.Google Scholar
Nessi, A. and Stanković, T. (2018), “Topology, shape, and size optimization of additively manufactured lattice structures based on the superformula”, in International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Volume 2A: 44th Design Automation Conference. ASME, p. V02AT03A042. http://doi.org/10.1115/detc2018-86191.Google Scholar
Ning, X. and Pellegrino, S. (2012), “Design of lightweight structural components for direct digital manufacturing”, in 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials and Co-located Conferences), pp. 1–21. http://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-1807.Google Scholar
Pasko, A. et al. (2011), “Procedural function-based modelling of volumetric microstructures”, Graphical Models. Elsevier Inc., Vol. 73 No. 5, pp. 165–181. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gmod.2011.03.001.Google Scholar
Rosen, D. W. (2016), “A review of synthesis methods for additive manufacturing”, Virtual and Physical Prototyping. Taylor & Francis, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 305–317. http://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.1240208.Google Scholar
Savio, G. et al. (2018a), “Geometric modeling of cellular materials for additive manufacturing in biomedical field: A review”, Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, Vol. 2018, pp. 1–14. http://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1654782.Google Scholar
Savio, G. et al. (2019), “Implications of modeling approaches on the fatigue behavior of cellular solids”, Additive Manufacturing. Elsevier, Vol. 25, pp. 50–58. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.047.Google Scholar
Savio, G., Meneghello, R. and Concheri, G. (2017), Optimization of lattice structures for Additive Manufacturing Technologies BT - Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing : Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Mechanics, Design Engineering & Advanced Manufacturing (JCM), in Eynard, B. et al. (eds). Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 213–222. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45781-9_22.Google Scholar
Savio, G., Meneghello, R. and Concheri, G. (2018b), “Geometric modeling of lattice structures for additive manufacturing”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 351–360. http://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-07-2016-0122.Google Scholar
Sellgren, U. (1999), “Simulation-driven design: motives, means, and opportunities”. KTH.Google Scholar
Shea, K., Aish, R. and Gourtovaia, M. (2005), “Towards integrated performance-driven generative design tools”, Automation in Construction. Elsevier, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 253–264. http://doi.org/10.1016/J.AUTCON.2004.07.002.Google Scholar
Shea, K. and Cagan, J. (1997), “Innovative dome design: Applying geodesic patterns with shape annealing”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering, Design, Analysis and Manufacturing. Cambridge University Press, Vol. 11 No. 05, p. 379. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060400003310.Google Scholar
Shea, K. and Smith, I. F. C. (2006), “Improving Full-Scale Transmission Tower Design through Topology and Shape Optimization”, Journal of Structural Engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 132 No. 5, pp. 781–790. http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:5(781).Google Scholar
Stanković, T. et al. (2015), “A Generalized Optimality Criteria Method for Optimization of Additively Manufactured Multimaterial Lattice Structures”, Journal of Mechanical Design. ASME, Vol. 137 No. 11, pp. 111405–111412. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030995.Google Scholar
Wang, C. et al. (2018), “Concurrent topology optimization design of structures and non-uniform parameterized lattice microstructures”, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 58 No. 1, pp. 35–50. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2009-0.Google Scholar
Wang, H. V. (2005), “A unit cell approach for lightweight structure and compliant mechanism”. Georgia Institute Of Technology.Google Scholar
Zegard, T. and Paulino, G. H. (2016), “Bridging topology optimization and additive manufacturing”, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 53 No. 1, pp. 175–192. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-015-1274-4.Google Scholar
Zorin, D. (2000), “Subdivision zoo”, Subdivision for Modeling and Animation, pp. 65–104.Google Scholar