Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T10:54:37.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Petro-Archaeological Study of a Deposit of Neolithic Stone Tools at Stará Břeclav, Czechoslovakia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2016

J. Štelcl ,
F. Kalousek  and
J. Malina
J. Štelcl
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistory, Department for Petrological Research on Archaeological Material of the PurkyněUniversity of Brno, Czechoslovakia
F. Kalousek
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistory, Department for Petrological Research on Archaeological Material of the PurkyněUniversity of Brno, Czechoslovakia
J. Malina
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistory, Department for Petrological Research on Archaeological Material of the PurkyněUniversity of Brno, Czechoslovakia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is no need to stress that at the present day it is becoming increasingly accepted that the further expansion of prehistory depends not only on the development and ever greater precision of the actual methods of archaeology, but also to an equal degree on the application of natural scientific research methods. This has been well exemplified in the series of systematic studies on petrological research on stone artifacts published in these Proceedings.

A similar tendency can be noted of late in many other European countries, France (Cogné and Giot, 1957; Giot, 1964), Austria (Zirkl, 1956–9), Germany (Frechen, 1965; Wiegers, 1950; Scholz, 1968), Hungary (Végh and Viczian, 1964), Poland (Kowalski and Kozlowski, 1959), the Soviet Union (Gajduk, 1963; Kovnurko, 1963; Petruň, 1967) and Switzerland (Hugi, 1948).

In Czechoslovakia, too, from 1960 onwards, regular petrological-archaeological co-operation has been carried on between the Department of Prehistory at the Philosophical Faculty of the Purkyně University of Brno and the Department of Mineralogy and Petrology of the same University. To begin with, the stone building material of Great Moravian architecture in the region of the lower Dyje valley and the lower Morava valley (Štelcl and Tejkal, 1961–7) was petrologically examined and latterly the investigation has been extended to cover the chipping and polishing industry of the Stone Age (Štelcl, 1967; Malina, forthcoming; Štelcl and Malina, 1966, and forthcoming).

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 36 , December 1970 , pp. 233 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cogné, J. and Giot, P. R., 1957. ‘L‘étude pétrographique des haches polies de Bretagne’, BSPF, 54, 240.Google Scholar
Frechen, J., 1965. ‘Petrographische Untersuchung von Steingeräte bzw. dessen Rohmaterial’, in Schietzel, K., Müddersheim, eine Ansiedlung der jüngeren Bandkeramik im Rheinland.Google Scholar
Gajduk, I. M., 1963. ‘Petrological and Spectral Analyses’. Tezisy dokladov na Vsesojuznom soveščanii po primeneniju v archeologii metodov estestvennych i techničeskych nauk, 49.Google Scholar
Giot, P. R., 1964. Résultats de l‘identification pétrographique des matériaux des haches polies en France septentrionale’, Studien aus Alteuropa, I, 123–33.Google Scholar
Hejtman, B., 1962. The Petrology of Metamorphosed Rocks.Google Scholar
Hügi, Th., 1948. ‘Chemische Untersuchungen an Steinwerkzeugen’, Schweize rische mineralogische und petrographische Mitteilungen, 28, 157–64.Google Scholar
Kovnurko, G. M., 1963. ‘The Use of Petrological Methods in the Investigation of Inter-kindred Bonds in the Neolithic Period in the North-West European Parts of the Soviet Union’, Tezisy dokladov na Vsesojuznom soveščanii po primeneniju v archeologii metodov estestvennych i techničeskych nauk, 48.Google Scholar
Kowalski, S. and Kozlowski, J. K., 1959. ‘De l'emploi du jaspe a l'époque épipaléolithique en Pologne du sud’, Materialy archeologiczne, I, 7–12.Google Scholar
Malina, J., ‘Die jungpaläolithische Steinindustrie aus Mähren, ihre Rohstoffe und ihre Patina’, Archaeologia Praehistorica. In the Press.Google Scholar
Petruň, V. F., 1967. ‘On the Reliability of Petrological–Mineralogical Determination in Archaeological Practice’. Zapiski odesskogo archeologičeskogo obščestva, II, 3–11.Google Scholar
Scholz, G. F., 1968. ‘Mineralogisch–petrophysikalische Untersuchungen an Steinwerkzeugen des Neolithikmus von Thüringen’, Ausgrabungen und Funde, 13, 286–94.Google Scholar
Stejskal, J. and Pelíšek, , 1956. Forestry Geology.Google Scholar
Štelcl, J., 1966. ‘Beitrag zur petrographischen Erforschung des Bausteins aus den Siedlungsobjekten des grossmährischen Fürstenpalastes in Pohansko bei Břeclav’, Journal of Studies of the Philosophical Faculty of the University of Brno. E 11, 51–8.Google Scholar
Štelcl, J., 1967. Zur Petrographie der von einigen Fundstellen des mährischen jüngeren Neolithikums entstammenden Steinindustrie’, Acta Musei Silesiae. A XVI, 143–57.Google Scholar
Štelcl, J. and Malina, J., 1966. ‘Bericht über petrographische Erforschung der Steinindustrie aus Plaveč (Bezirk Znojmo)’, Journal of Studies of the Philosophical Faculty of the University of Brno. E 11, 123–5.Google Scholar
Štelcl, J. and Malina, J., ‘Petrographie in der Archäologie’, Journal of Studies of the Philosophical Faculty of the University of Brno. E 14. In the Press.Google Scholar
Štelcl, J. and Malina, J., ‘Die Steinindustrie von einer neolithischen Siedlung bei Kyjovice (Kreis Znojmo)’, Journal of Studies of the Philosophical Faculty of the University of Brno. E 14. In the Press.Google Scholar
Štelcl, J. and Tejkal, J., 1961. ‘Petrographischer Beitrag zur Erforschung der grossmährischen Burgstätte Pohansko bei Břeclav,’ Publications de la Faculté des sciences de l'Université J. E. Purkyně Brno. F 9, 415–50.Google Scholar
Štelcl, J. and Tejkal, J., 1963a. ‘Petrographische Beitrage zur archaologischen Erforschung der grossmährischen Burgwallstadt Veligrad—Staré Město’, Folia Fac. Sci. Nat. Univ. Purk., IV/5, 83–104.Google Scholar
Štelcl, J. and Tejkal, J., 1963b. ‘Petrographischer Beitrag zur Erforschung der grossmährischen Burgwallstadt Mikulcice’, Folia Fac. Sci. Nat. Univ. Purk. IV/1, 1–27.Google Scholar
Štelcl, J. and Tejkal, J., 1967. ‘Ein petrographischer Beitrag zur archäologischen Erforschung der grossmährischen Burgwallstadt Mikulcice, Archeologické rozhledy, XIX, 54–63.Google Scholar
Végh, A. and Viczián, I., 1964. ‘Petrographische Untersuchungen an den Silexwerkzeugen’. In Vértes, L., Tata, eine mittelpaläolithische Travertin—Siedlung in Ungarn.Google Scholar
Velímský, T., 1969. The Grinding Industry from Bylany. Diploma Thesis. Brno.Google Scholar
Vencl, Sl., ‘Les instruments lithiques des premiers agriculteurs en Europe centrale’, Acta Musei Nationalis Pragae. Series A—Historia, XIV, No. 1–2, 1–91.Google Scholar
Vértes, L. and Tóth, L., 1963. ‘Der Gebrauch des glasigen Quarzporphyrs im Paläolithikum des Bükk—Gebirges’, Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 15, 3–10.Google Scholar
Wiegers, F., 1950. ‘RohstoffVersorgung im Paläolithikum’, Praehistorische Zeitschrift, XXXIV/V, 225–30.Google Scholar
Zirkl, E., 1956–1959. ‘Das Gesteinsmaterial der Artefakte von Willendorf i. d. Wachau. N. Ö’. Mitteilungen der Prähistorischen Komission der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, VIII und IX, 1. Teil, 98–108.Google Scholar