Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T13:39:21.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Groups of units of zero ternary quadratic forms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2011

Colin Maclachlan
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Aberdeen, Edward Wright Building, Dunbar Street, Aberdeen AB9 2TY, Scotland

Synopsis

The groups of units of indefinite ternary quadratic forms with rational integer coefficients contain subgroups of index two which are isomorphic to Fuchsian groups and which, for zero forms, are commensurable with the classical modular group. This is used to obtain a family of forms whose groups are representatives of the conjugacy classes of maximal groups associated with zero forms. The signatures of the groups of the forms in this family are determined and it is shown that the group associated to any zero form is isomorphic to a subgroup of finite index in the group of one of three particular forms. This last result should be compared with the corresponding result by Mennicke on non-zero forms.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Atkin, A. O. L. and Lehner, J.. Hecke operators on Гo(m). Math. Ann. 185 (1970), 134–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Borel, A. and , Harish-Chandra. Arithmetic subgroups of algebraic groups. Ann. of Math. 75 (1962), 485535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Cassels, J. W. S.. Rational Quadratic Forms (London: Academic, 1978).Google Scholar
4Fricke, R.. Lehrbuch der Algebra (Bd 3) (Braunschweig: Vieweg, 1928).Google Scholar
5Fricke, R. and Klein, F.. Vorlesungen über die Theorie der automorphen Funktionen, Vol. 1 (Leipzig: Teubner, 1897).Google Scholar
6Helling, H.. Bestimmung der Kommensurabilitätsklasse der Hilbertschen Modulgruppe. Math. Z. 92 (1966), 269280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Helling, H.. On the commensurability class of the rational modular group. J. London Math. Soc. 2 (1970), 6772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Knopp, M. J. and Newman, M.. Congruence subgroups of positive genus of the modular group. Illinois J. Math. 9 (1965), 577583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Lam, T. Y.. The algebraic theory of quadratic forms (Massachusetts: Benjamin, 1973).Google Scholar
10Long, R. L.. Algebraic number theory (New York: Marcel Dekker, 1977).Google Scholar
11Macbeath, A. M. and Hoare, A. H. M., Groups of hyperbolic crystallography. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 79 (1976), 235249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Magnus, W.. Non-euclidean tesselations and their groups (New York: Academic, 1974).Google Scholar
13Mennicke, J.. On the groups of units of ternary quadratic forms with rational coefficients. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 67 (1963–7), 309–52.Google Scholar
14Millington, M. H.. On cycloidal subgroups of the modular group. Proc. London Math. Soc. 19 (1969), 164–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Plesken, W.. Automorphs of ternary quadratic forms. In Selected topics on ternary forms and norms, ed. Todd, O. T.. Calif. Inst. Tech. Pasadena (1976) Paper No. 5, 34 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Shimura, G.. Introduction to the arithmetic theory of automorphic functions (Princeton Univ. Press, 1971).Google Scholar
17Siegel, C. L.. Über die analytische Theorie der quadratischen Formen. Ann. of Math. 36 (1935), 527606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Siegel, C. L.. Über die analytische Theorie der quadratischen Formen II. Ann. of Math. 37 (1936), 230263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Singerman, D.. Subgroups of Fuchsian groups and finite permutation groups. Bull. London Math. Soc. 2 (1970), 319–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Swinnerton-Dyer, H. P. F.. Arithmetic groups. In Discrete groups and automorphic functions, ed. Harvey, W. J., pp. 377401 (London: Academic, 1977).Google Scholar