Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T23:07:54.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On a property of the nodal set of least energy sign-changing solutions for quasilinear elliptic equations

Part of: Elliptic equations and systems Optimality conditions Partial differential equations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2019

Vladimir Bobkov  and
Sergey Kolonitskii
Vladimir Bobkov
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and NTIS, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of West Bohemia, Univerzitní 8, Plzeñ 306 14, Czech Republic (bobkov@kma.zcu.cz)
Sergey Kolonitskii
Affiliation:
St. Petersburg State University, 7/9 Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg 199034, Russia (s.kolonitsky@spbu.ru)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this note, we prove the Payne-type conjecture about the behaviour of the nodal set of least energy sign-changing solutions for the equation $-\Delta _p u = f(u)$ in bounded Steiner symmetric domains $ \Omega \subset {{\open R}^N} $ under the zero Dirichlet boundary conditions. The nonlinearity f is assumed to be either superlinear or resonant. In the latter case, least energy sign-changing solutions are second eigenfunctions of the zero Dirichlet p-Laplacian in Ω. We show that the nodal set of any least energy sign-changing solution intersects the boundary of Ω. The proof is based on a moving polarization argument.

Keywords

p-Laplaciansuperlinearsecond eigenvalueleast energy nodal solutionnodal setPayne conjecturepolarization

MSC classification

Primary: 35J92: Quasilinear elliptic equations with $p$-Laplacian
Secondary: 35B06: Symmetries, invariants, etc. 49K30: Optimal solutions belonging to restricted classes
Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics , Volume 149 , Issue 5 , October 2019 , pp. 1163 - 1173
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Aftalion, A. and Pacella, F.. Qualitative properties of nodal solutions of semilinear elliptic equations in radially symmetric domains. Comptes Rendus Mathematique 339 (2004), 339–344 (doi: 10.1016/j.crma.2004.07.004).Google Scholar
2Alessandrini, G.. Nodal lines of eigenfunctions of the fixed membrane problem in general convex domains. Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 69 (1994), 142–154 (doi: 10.1007/BF02564478).Google Scholar
3Anoop, T. V., Drábek, P. and Sasi, S.. On the structure of the second eigenfunctions of the p-Laplacian on a ball. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 144 (2016), 2503–2512 (doi: 10.1090/proc/12902).Google Scholar
4Bartsch, T., Weth, T. and Willem, M.. Partial symmetry of least energy nodal solutions to some variational problems. J. d'Analyse Mathématique 96 (2005), 1–18 (doi: 10.1007/bf02787822).Google Scholar
5Bobkov, V. E.. On existence of nodal solution to elliptic equations with convex-concave nonlinearities. Ufa Mathematical Journal 5 (2013), 18–30 (doi: 10.13108/2013-5-2-18).Google Scholar
6Bobkov, V. and Kolonitskii, S.. On qualitative properties of solutions for elliptic problems with the p-Laplacian through domain perturbations. (2017). arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.07408.Google Scholar
7Bonheure, D., Bouchez, V., Grumiau, C. and Van Schaftingen, J.. Asymptotics and symmetries of least energy nodal solutions of Lane-Emden problems with slow growth. Commun. Contemp. Math. 10 (2008), 609–631 (doi: 10.1142/S0219199708002910).Google Scholar
8Brock, F. and Solynin, A.. An approach to symmetrization via polarization. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 352 (2000), 1759–1796 (doi: 10.1090/s0002-9947-99-02558-1).Google Scholar
9Castro, A., Cossio, J. and Neuberger, J. M.. A sign-changing solution for a superlinear Dirichlet problem. Rocky Mountain J. Math. 27 (1997), 1041–1053 (doi: 10.1216/rmjm/1181071858).Google Scholar
10Cuesta, M., De Figueiredo, D. and Gossez, J. P.. The beginning of the Fučik spectrum for the p-Laplacian. J. Differ. Equ. 159 (1999), 212–238 (doi: 10.1006/jdeq.1999.3645).Google Scholar
11Cuesta, M., De Figueiredo, D. G. and Gossez, J. P.. A nodal domain property for the p-Laplacian. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences-Series I-Mathematics 330 (2000), 669–673 (doi: 10.1016/S0764-4442(00)00245-7).Google Scholar
12Damascelli, L.. On the nodal set of the second eigenfunction of the laplacian in symmetric domains in ${\open {R}}^N$. Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei. Classe di Scienze Fisiche, Matematiche e Naturali. Rendiconti Lincei. Matematica e Applicazioni 11 (2000), 175–181, http://eudml.org/doc/252373.Google Scholar
13Drábek, P. and Robinson, S. B.. Resonance problems for the p-Laplacian. J. Funct. Anal. 169 (1999), 189–200 (doi: 10.1006/jfan.1999.3501).Google Scholar
14Drábek, P., Kufner, A. and Nicolosi, F.. Quasilinear elliptic equations with degenerations and singularities, vol. 5 (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1997), (doi: 10.1515/9783110804775).Google Scholar
15Fournais, S.. The nodal surface of the second eigenfunction of the Laplacian in ${\open {R}}^D$ can be closed. J. Differ. Equ. 173 (2001), 145–159 (doi: 10.1006/jdeq.2000.3868).Google Scholar
16Ghoussoub, N.. Duality and perturbation methods in critical point theory vol. 107 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
17Grossi, M., Grumiau, C. and Pacella, F.. Lane-Emden problems: Asymptotic behavior of low energy nodal solutions. Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincare (C) Non Linear Analysis 30 (2013), 121–140 (doi: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2012.06.005).Google Scholar
18Grumiau, C. and Parini, E.. On the asymptotics of solutions of the Lane-Emden problem for the p-Laplacian. Archiv der Mathematik 91 (2008), 354–365 (doi: 10.1007/s00013-008-2854-y).Google Scholar
19Grumiau, C. and Troestler, C.. Nodal line structure of least energy nodal solutions for Lane-Emden problems. Comptes Rendus Mathematique 347 (2009), 767–771 (doi: 10.1016/j.crma.2009.04.023).Google Scholar
20Hoffmann-Ostenhof, M., Hoffmann-Ostenhof, T. and Nadirashvili, N.. The nodal line of the second eigenfunction of the Laplacian in ${\open {R}}^2$ can be closed. Duke Math. J. 90 (1997), 631–640 (doi: 10.1215/S0012-7094-97-09017-7).Google Scholar
21Kawohl, B.. Rearrangements and convexity of level sets in PDE. Lecture notes in mathematics, vol. 1150 (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1985 (doi: 10.1007/BFb0075060).Google Scholar
22Lieberman, G. M.. Boundary regularity for solutions of degenerate elliptic equations. Nonlinear. Anal. Theory. Methods. Appl. 12 (1988), 1203–1219 (doi: 10.1016/0362-546x(88)90053-3).Google Scholar
23Nazarov, A. I.. On Solutions to the Dirichlet problem for an equation with p-Laplacian in a spherical layer. Proc. St. Petersburg Math. Soc. 10 (2004), 33–62 (doi: 10.1090/trans2/214/03).Google Scholar
24Payne, L. E.. Isoperimetric inequalities and their applications. SIAM Rev. 9 (1967), 453–488 (doi: 10.1137/1009070).Google Scholar
25Payne, L. E.. On two conjectures in the fixed membrane eigenvalue problem. Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik 24 (1973), 721–729 (doi: 10.1007/BF01597076).Google Scholar
26Serrin, J.. A symmetry problem in potential theory. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 43 (1971), 304–318 (doi: 10.1007/BF00250468).Google Scholar
27Tolksdorf, P.. Regularity for a more general class of quasilinear elliptic equations. J. Differ. Equ. 51 (1984), 126–150 (doi: 10.1016/0022-0396(84)90105-0).Google Scholar
28Vázquez, J. L.. A strong maximum principle for some quasilinear elliptic equations. Appl. Math. Optim. 12 (1984), 191–202 (doi: 10.1007/bf01449041).Google Scholar