Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-16T18:27:37.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Singular limits for travelling waves for a pair of equations*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2011

Vivian Hutson  and
Konstantin Mischaikow
Vivian Hutson
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7RH, U.K.
Konstantin Mischaikow
Affiliation:
Cenlcr for Dynamical Systems and Nonlinear Studies, School of Mathematics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, U.S.A.mischaik@math.gatech.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The singular limit as one diffusion coefficient approaches zero is considered for travelling wave solutions to a pair f reaction diffusion equations. An explicit criterion determining the sign of the wave speed is obtained. The limit behaviour turns out to be of a different nature for positive and negative wave speed. Different techniques, which may be applicable to a range of examples, are needed in the two cases.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics , Volume 126 , Issue 2 , 1996 , pp. 399 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Alexander, J., Gardner, R. and Jones, C.. A topological invariant arising in the stability analysis of travelling waves. J. Reine Angew. Math. 410 (1990), 167–212.Google Scholar
2Conley, C.. Isolated Invariant Sets and the Morse Index, CBMS Lecture Notes 38 (Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Conley, C. and Fife, P.. Critical manifolds, travelling waves, and an example from population genetics. Math. Biol. 14 (1982), 159–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Conley, C. and Gardner, R.. An application of the generalized Morse index to travelling wave solutions of a competitive reaction diffusion model. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 33 (1989), 319–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Dunbar, S.. Travelling wave solutions of diffusive Lotka–Volterra equations: a heteroclinic connection in ℝ4. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 286 (1984), 557–96.Google Scholar
6Fife, P. C.. Mathematical Aspects of Reacting and Diffusing Systems, Lecture Notes in Biomathematics 28 (New York: Springer, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Gardner, R.. Existence of travelling wave solution of predator prey systems via the Conley index. SI AM J. Math. Anal. 13 (1982). 167–79.Google Scholar
8Gardner, R. and Jones, C.. Stability of traveling wave solutions of diffusive predator-prey systems. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 327 (1991), 465–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Hutson, V.. Stability in a reaction diffusion model of mutualism. SLAM J. Math. Anal 17 (1986), 58–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Hutson, V., Law, R. and Lewis, D.. Dynamics of ecologically obligate mutualisms- effects of spatial diffusion on resilience of the interacting species. American Naturalist 126 (1985), 465– 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Jones, C.. Kapitula, T. and Powell, J.. Nearly real fronts in a Ginzburg Landau equation. I'roc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 116 (1990). 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Keener, J.. Frequency dependent decoupling of parallel excitable fibers. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 49 (1989). 210–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Mischaikow, K. and Hutson, V.. Travelling waves for mutuahst species. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 24 (1993), 987–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Mischaikow, K. and Reineck, J.. Travelling waves in predator prey systems. SIAM. 1. Math. Anal. 24 (1993), 1179–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Nishiura, Y., Mimura, M.. Tkeda, H. and Fujii, H.. Singular limit analysis of stability of traveling wave solutions in bistable reaction-diffusion systems. SIAM J. Math. Ana. 21 (1990), 85–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Salamon, D.. Connected simple systems and the Conlcy index of isolated invariant sets. Tram. Amer. Math. Soc. 291 (1985), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar