1. See, for example, Hobsbawm, E. J., The Age of Empire, 1875–1914 (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1987), esp. pp. 84–141, 192–218.Google Scholar

2. On the ideology of reform and the “new liberalism” in England, see Barker, Michael, Gladstone and Radicalism: The Reconstruction of Liberal Policy in Britain 1885–1894 (Brighton, U.K.: Harvester, 1975)Google Scholar; Freeden, Michael, The New Liberalism: An Ideology of Social Reform (Oxford: Clarendon, 1978)Google Scholar; Emy, H. V., Liberals, Radicals, and Social Politics, 1892–1914 (London: Cambridge University Press, 1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Wolfe, Willard, From Radicalism to Socialism: Men and Ideas in the Formation of Fabian Socialist Doctrines, 1881–1889 (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1975)Google Scholar. On the Anglo-American liberal connections, see Fredman, L. E., “Trans-Atlantic Liberalism in the Progressive Era,” Australian Journal of American Studies 1 (07 1981): 25–38Google Scholar; and Morgan, Kenneth O., “The Future at Work: Anglo-American Progressivism, 1890–1917,” in Contrast and Connection: Bicentennial Essays in Anglo-American History, ed. Allen, H. C. and Thompson, Roger (London: G. Bell and Sons, 1976), pp. 245–71Google Scholar. On the English-New Zealand connections, see Hamer, David, The New Zealand Liberals: The Years of Power, 1891–1912 (Auckland: Auckland University Press, 1988), esp. pp. 48–64Google Scholar. On the specific influences of the ideas of Henry George and John Stuart Mill in New Zealand, see Rogers, Frank, “The Influence of Political Theories in the Liberal Period, 1890–1912: Henry George and John Stuart Mill,” in Studies of a Small Democracy: Essays in Honour of Willis Airey, ed. Chapman, Robert and Sinclair, Keith (Sydney: Halstead, 1965), pp. 153–74Google Scholar. On the New Zealand–American linkages, see Coleman, Peter J., Progressivism and the World of Reform: New Zealand and the Origins of the American Welfare State (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1987).Google Scholar

3. One reason for the disregard of the complexity of the cultural and ideological dimension of reform is Coleman's narrow construction of the concept of ideology along the lines of explicit political belief systems. See Coleman, , Progressivism, pp. 76, 78Google Scholar. As will become clear in my text, a more inclusive and dynamic definition is needed, especially in order to apprehend the cultural and discursive elements in ideology.

4. On the historical use of the deconstructive and semiological approach to texts, see Henning, E. M., “Archaeology, Deconstruction and Intellectual History,” in Modern European Intellectual History: Reappraisals and New Perspectives, ed. LaCapra, Dominick and Caplan, Steven L. (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1982), pp. 153–96Google Scholar; and White, Hayden, The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987), esp. pp. 196–208Google Scholar. On the intersection of ideology and discourse analysis, see Frow, John, Marxism and Literary Form (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986), esp. pp. 51–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a review of discourse analysis in French, Anglo-American, and German historiography, see Schottler, Peter, “Historians and Discourse Analysis,” History Workshop 27 (Spring 1989): 37–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For examples of the reconstructive approach to ideology and the reading of texts, see Baker, Keith Michael, “On the Problems of the Ideological Origins of the French Revolution,” pp. 197–219Google Scholar; and LaCapra, , “Rethinking Intellectual History and Reading Texts,” pp. 47–85Google Scholar, in Modern European Intellectual History. Also, see LaCapra, , Rethinking Intellectual History: Texts, Contexts, Language (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1983)Google Scholar. Good general surveys of reader-response and reception theory can be found in The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation, ed. Suleiman, Susan R. and Crosman, Inge (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Holub, Robert C., Reception Theory: A Critical Introduction (London: Metheun, 1984).Google Scholar

5. For the most accessible and enlivening discussion of S-Matrix theory, see Capra, Fritjof, The Tao of Physics (Berkeley, Calif.: Shambhala, 1975), pp. 262–76Google Scholar; and Capra, , The Turning Point: Science, Society, and the Rising Culture (London: Fontana, 1983), pp. 83–88Google Scholar. For the more complicated and mathematical model developed by its leading contemporary proponent, see Chew, Geoffrey F., S Matrix Theory of Strong Interactions (New York: W. A. Benjamin, 1962).Google Scholar

6. The following works have been particularly useful for my synthetic definition of the ideological matrix: Thompson, Kenneth, Beliefs and Ideology (Chichester, U.K.: Ellis Horwood, 1986)Google Scholar; Giddens, Anthony, Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction (London: Macmillan, 1979), esp. pp. 165–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Politics and Ideology: A Reader, ed. Donald, James and Hall, Stuart (Milton Keynes, U.K.: Open University Press, 1986), esp. pp. ix–xxGoogle Scholar; Eagleton, Terry, “Ideology and Scholarship,” in Historical Studies and Literary Criticism, ed. McGann, Jerome J. (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985), pp. 114–25Google Scholar; and Mouffe, Chantal, “Hegemony and Ideology in Gramsci,” in Gramsci and Marxist Theory, ed. Mouffe, (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979), pp. 168–204.Google Scholar

7. Mouffe, , “Hegemony and Ideology,” pp. 194–95.Google Scholar

8. Williams, Raymond, Marxism and Literature (London: Oxford University Press, 1977), pp. 112–13Google Scholar. Also, see Mouffe, , “Hegemony and Ideology,” p. 195.Google Scholar

9. Gramsci's discussion of hegemony, the “historic bloc,” and the “moral and intellectual bloc” can be found scattered throughout his prison notebooks. On his analysis of intellectuals, see Selections from the Prison Notebooks, trans, and ed. Hoare, Quintin and Smith, Geoffrey Nowell (New York: International Publishers, 1971), pp. 5–23Google Scholar. For relevant interpretations, see Adamson, Walter L., Hegemony and Revolution: A Study of Antonio Gramsci's Political and Social Theory (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980), esp. pp. 140–201Google Scholar; Buci-Glucksmann, Christine, Gramsci and the State, trans. Fernback, David (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1980)Google Scholar; Femia, Joseph, Gramsci's Political Thought: Hegemony, Consciousness, and the Revolutionary Process (Oxford: Clarendon, 1981), esp. pp. 23–60Google Scholar; Salamini, Leonardo, The Sociology of Political Praxis: An Introduction to Gramsci's Theory (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981)Google Scholar; the essays in Mouffe, , Gramsci and Marxist TheoryGoogle Scholar; Lears, T. J. Jackson, “The Concept of Cultural Hegemony: Problems and Possibilities,” American Historical Review 90 (06 1985): 567–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Williams, Gwyn A., “The Concept of ‘Egemonia’ in the Thought of Antonio Gramsci: Some Notes and Interpretation,” Journal of the History of Ideas 21 (10–12 1960): 586–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Concerning hegemony as a strategic force and the possibility this raises for a synthesis of Gramsci with Foucault, see Mouffe, , “Hegemony and Ideology,” p. 201Google Scholar; Lears, , “Cultural Hegemony,” p. 569Google Scholar; Smart, Barry, Foucault, Marxism and Critique (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1983), pp. 38–42, 73–93Google Scholar; and Smail, John, “New Languages for Labove and Capital: The Transformation of Discourse in the Early Years of the Industrial Revolution,” Social History 12 (10 1987): 51–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On the interaction of hegemony and culture from an anthropological perspective, see Laitin, David D., Hegemony and Culture: Politics and Religious Change Among the Yoruba (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986)Google Scholar. On the interaction of hegemony and culture in the American historical context at the turn of the century, see Lears, T. J. Jackson, No Place of Grace: Antimodernism and the Transformation of American Culture, 1880–1920 (New York: Pantheon, 1981)Google Scholar; and Rosenzweig, Roy, Eight Hours for What We Will: Workers and Leisure in an Industrial City, 1870–1920 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

10. For a grounding of the definition of modernism, see Berman, Marshall, All That Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1982), esp. pp. 15–36Google Scholar. On the emergence of modernism in America, see Trachtenberg, Alan, The Incorporation of America: Culture and Society in the Gilded Age (New York: Hill and Wang, 1982)Google Scholar. On the connections between modernism and antimodernism in America, see Lears, , No Place of GraceGoogle Scholar. In the New Zealand context, see Sinclair, Keith, A Destiny Apart: New Zealand's Search for National Identity (Wellington: Allen and Unwin, 1986), esp. pp. 61–76Google Scholar. Sinclair, unfortunately, conflates modernism and modernization and thus occludes the global cultural dynamic behind New Zealand reform at the turn of the century (pp. 68–72). Two articles that give a sense of the cultural trajectory of modernism in New Zealand without actually discussing modernism as a self-constituted and constituting dynamic are Olssen, Erik, “Towards a New Society,” pp. 250–78Google Scholar, and Gibbons, P. J., “The Climate of Opinion,” pp. 302–30Google Scholar, in The Oxford History of New Zealand, ed. Oliver, W. H. with Williams, B. R. (Wellington: Oxford University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

11. Fiske, John, Outlines of Cosmic Philosophy (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1892), vol. 2, p. 201Google Scholar. Outlines was first published in 1874. On how Fiske's reconciliation opened the door to the positivist and modernist adaptation of traditional Protestant ethics, see Lears, , No Place of Grace, pp. 22–23.Google Scholar

12. On this ethical/political connection in Bellamy's thinking, see Bowman, Sylvia, The Year 2000: A Critical Biography of Edward Bellamy (New York: Bookman, 1958), pp. 185–89Google Scholar. On the meaning of the ethical state for Gramsci, see Buci-Glucksmann, , Gramsci and the State, p. 127Google Scholar. On the ethical state in the “new liberalism” in England, see Freeden, , New Liberalism, esp. pp. 66–70Google Scholar. On the transformation of English liberalism analyzed from a Gramscian perspective, see Hall, Stuart, “Variants of Liberalism,” in Politics and Ideology, pp. 62–66.Google Scholar

13. Stout, Robert, “What Is the State?” Zealandia 2 (08 1889): 74.Google Scholar

14. Gramsci, , Prison Notebooks, p. 247Google Scholar. Commentaries on this interpenetration can be found in Adamson, , Hegemony and Revolution, pp. 162–68Google Scholar; and Buci-Glucksmann, , Gramsci and the State, pp. 70–71, 127, 384–86Google Scholar. On the state as balancing act for Stout and the liberals in New Zealand, see Hamer, , New Zealand Liberals, pp. 45, 78Google Scholar; Hamer, , “Sir Robert Stout and the Labour Question, 1870–1893,” in Studies of a Small Democracy, pp. 78–101Google Scholar; McIvor, Timothy, The Rainmaker: A Biography of John Ballance (Auckland: Heinemann Reed, 1989), p. 4Google Scholar; Olssen, Erik, A History of Otago (Dunedin: John McIndoe, 1984), p. 98Google Scholar; and Oliver, W. H., “Social Policy in the Liberal Period,” New Zealand Journal of History 13 (04 1979): 25–33.Google Scholar

15. Stout, , “What Is the State?” p. 72.Google Scholar

16. Gramsci, , Prison Notebooks, p. 259Google Scholar. An interesting connection here is Hamer's observation that “[v]oting Liberal seemed to be associated with a high level of support for mechanics' institutes, athaneaums, debating societies, and other cultural attributes of the ‘urban frontier’ type of community.” See Hamer, , New Zealand Liberals, p. 151.Google Scholar

17. On women's emancipation in the West and its political implications, see Hobsbawm, , Age of Empire, pp. 192–218Google Scholar. On the connections between bourgeois discourse and women's emancipation in the Progressive Era in the United States, see Smith-Rosenberg, Carroll, Disorderly Conduct: Visions of Gender in Victorian America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), pp. 167–78Google Scholar. On feminism in 19th-century America, see Hayden, Dolores, The Grand Domestic Revolution (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1981)Google Scholar; Leach, William, True Love and Perfect Union: The Feminist Reform of Sex and Society (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981)Google Scholar; DuBois, Ellen Carol, Feminism and Suffrage: The Emergence of an Independent Women's Movement in America, 1848–1869 (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1978)Google Scholar; and Buhle, Mari Jo, Women and American Socialism, 1870–1920 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1981)Google Scholar. On the rise of feminism in the West during this period, see Evans, Richard J., The Feminists: Women's Emancipation Movements in Europe, America, and Australasia, 1840–1920 (London: Croom Helm, 1977)Google Scholar. On feminism in England, see Levine, Phillippa, Victorian Feminism, 1850–1900 (London: Hutchinson, 1987)Google Scholar. On the development of feminism and social reform that includes an insightful analysis of the social base and political implications of feminism and reform in Canada, see Bacchi, Carol Lee, Liberation Deferred? The Ideas of the English-Canadian Suffragists, 1877–1918 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1983)Google Scholar. For a discussion of the “new woman” in New Zealand, see Grimshaw, Patricia, Women's Suffrage in New Zealand (Auckland: Auckland University Press, 1987), esp. pp. 1–11Google Scholar. For a discussion of the implications of the emancipation of women for the urban intellectual elite of Dunedin, see Olssen, , History of Otago, esp. pp. 93–95.Google Scholar

18. Egeria, , “Women's Work in the World,” Zealandia 11 (05 1890): 650, 653Google Scholar. Taking Egeria as her nom de plume, this anonymous feminist obviously wants to be the sort of inspiration for the law that her Roman namesake was said to be.

19. Egeria, , “Women's Work,” 650–53Google Scholar. On the “colonial helpmeet,” see Dalziel, Raewyn, “The Colonial Helpmeet: Women's Role and the Vote in Nineteenth Century New Zealand,” in Women in History: Essays on European Women in New Zealand, ed. Brookes, Barbara, Macdonald, Charlotte, and Tennant, Margaret (Wellington: Allen and Unwin, 1986), pp. 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20. Bourke, E. M., “The Question of Female Suffrage,” Zealandia 4 (10 1889): 232.Google Scholar

21. Bourke, , “Female Suffrage,” p. 231.Google Scholar

22. Levine, , Victorian Feminism, p. 14Google Scholar. Also, see Bacchi, , Liberation Deferred? pp. 116, 147.Google Scholar

23. Quoted in Hayden, , Grand Domestic Revolution, p. 5Google Scholar. For a good biography of Frances Willard, see Bordin, Ruth, Frances Willard: A Biography (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1986).Google Scholar

24. See Hayden, , Grand Domestic Revolution, pp. 16–17Google Scholar, passim. Also, see Hobsbawm, , Age of Empire, p. 215.Google Scholar

25. For a definition of technological utopianism and its impact in America, see Segal, Howard P., Technological Utopianism in American Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985).Google Scholar

26. Otago Daily Times, 02 25, 1890Google Scholar, Supplement. On the promotion of technological utopianism and Industrial Exhibitions and World's Fairs, see Segal, , Technological Utopianism, passim.Google Scholar

27. Bowman, , Year 2000, p. 291.Google Scholar

28. Quoted in Hayden, , Grand Domestic Revolution, p. 148.Google Scholar

29. On Anglo-Saxon revitalization in America, see Lears, , No Place of Grace, pp. 108–16Google Scholar. On the connections between Anglo-Saxon revitalization and nativism in the United States, see Higham, John, Strangers in the Land: Patterns of American Nativism 1860–1925 (New York: Atheneum, 1963), esp. pp. 234–63.Google Scholar

30. Quoted in Takaki, Ronald T., Iron Cages: Race and Culture in Nineteenth-Century America (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1982), pp. 261–62Google Scholar. For Strong's missionary message and the foundations of American imperialism at the end of the 19th Century, see LaFeber, Walter, The New Empire: An Interpretation of American Expansion 1860–1898 (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1963), pp. 72–80Google Scholar. Bellamy's sentiments in this seem to suggest a more uplifting approach to the “white man's burden.” Doctor Leete, the voice of 20th-century reason, responds to a question from Julian West on whether “the societies of the Old World [have] also been remodeled?” “Yes,” replied Doctor Leete, “the great nations of Europe as well as Australia, Mexico, and parts of South America, are now organized industrially like the United States, which was the pioneer of the evolution. The peaceful relations of these nations are assured by a loose form of federal union of worldwide extent. An international council regulates the mutual intercourse and commerce of the members of the union and their joint policy toward the more backward races, which are gradually being educated up to the civilized institutions” (Bellamy, Edward, Looking Backward 2000–1887, ed. and intro. Tichi, Cecelia [New York: Penguin, 1984], p. 115).Google Scholar

31. Fiske, , Cosmic Philosophy, p. 255.Google Scholar

32. Quoted in Sinclair, Keith, William Pember Reeves: New Zealand Fabian (Oxford: Clarendon, 1965), p. 226Google Scholar. On other contradictions in Reeves's reform politics, see Oliver, W. H., “Reeves, Sinclair, and the Social Pattern,” in The Feel of Truth: Essays in New Zealand and Pacific History, ed. Munz, Peter (Wellington: A. H. and A. W. Reed, 1969), pp. 163–78.Google Scholar

33. On Reeves's anti-Chinese attitudes; see Sinclair, , William Pember Reeves, pp. 226–27Google Scholar. On prejudice against the Chinese among middle- and working-class reformers in America, see Takaki, , Iron Cages, pp. 215–49Google Scholar. In New Zealand, see Olssen, , History of Otago, pp. 105–6Google Scholar. Reeves's efforts to revitalize New Zealand society conform to anthropologist Anthony Wallace's definition of revitalization as “a deliberate, organized, conscious effort by members of a society to construct a more satisfying culture” (quoted in Adas, Michael, Prophets of Rebellion: Millenarian Protest Movements Against the European Colonial Order [Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1979], p. xvii)Google Scholar. It is a curious dialectic that connects the revitalization movements of colonized peoples or oppressed minorities to those of the dominators. Just as Anglo-Saxon revitalization appears among the elite of the dominant society in America and New Zealand, so revitalization movements are evident among the indigenous peoples in both countries. On the Ghost Dance movement as a revitalization effort for Plains Indians, see Turner, Frederick, Beyond Geography: The Western Spirit Against the Wilderness (New York: Viking, 1980), pp. 289–95Google Scholar. On revitalization movements and the indigenous people, the Maori, of New Zealand, see Webster, Peter, Rua and the Maori Millennium (Wellington: Price Milburn, 1979).Google Scholar

34. On purity, women's empowerment, and the temperance movement in New Zealand, see Bunkle, Phillida, “The Origins of the Women's Movement in New Zealand: The Women's Christian Temperance Union, 1885–1895,” in Women in New Zealand Society, ed. Bunkle, Phillida and Hughes, Beryl (Auckland: Allen and Unwin, 1980), esp. pp. 70–74Google Scholar. On the contradictory ideological and political dynamics in purity crusades among English feminism, see Levine, , Victorian Feminism, pp. 150–51Google Scholar; and Mort, Frank, “Purity, Feminism, and the State: Sexuality and Moral Politics, 1880–1914,” in Crises in the British State, 1880–1930 (London: Hutchinson, 1985), pp. 209–25Google Scholar; among Canadian feminism, see Bacchi, , Liberation Deferred? pp. 104–16Google Scholar. For studies of those dynamics in an American context, see Bordin, Ruth, Women and Temperance: The Quest for Power and Liberty, 1873–1900 (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1981)Google Scholar; and Epstein, Barbara Leslie, The Politics of Domesticity: Women, Evangelism, and Temperance in Nineteenth Century America (Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

35. Egeria, , “Women's Work,” pp. 650–53.Google Scholar

36. Bacchi, , Liberation Deferred? p. 116.Google Scholar

37. Hutchinson, F. B., “The Higher Purpose and Meaning of Physical Education,” Zealandia 10 (04 1890): 605–11Google Scholar. As Jock Phillips has ably demonstrated in his study of New Zealand masculinity, this obsession with physical development and racial regeneration was not “narrowly genetic,” but a concern with the degenerating effects of modern urban life (Phillips, Jock, A Man's Country: The Image of the Pakeha Male – a History [Auckland: Penguin, 1987], p. 98)Google Scholar. For an American equivalent to Hutchinson and his obsessions, see Lears, , No Place of Grace, p. 28Google Scholar. On the stress on athleticism and its connection to revitalization efforts in New Zealand, see Phillips, , Man's CountryGoogle Scholar. On the emphasis on physical involvement in America at the end of the 19th Century, see Higham, John, “The Reorientation of American Culture in the 1890's,” in The Origins of Modern Consciousness, ed. Weiss, John (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1965), pp. 25–48Google Scholar; and Lears, , No Place of Grace, passim.Google Scholar

38. Hutchinson, , “Higher Purpose,” p. 606Google Scholar. On the antimodernist tendencies of the Anglo-Saxon elite in America, see Lears, , No Place of Grace.Google Scholar

39. On Bellamy's view of urban degeneration, see Bowman, , Year 2000, p. 249Google Scholar. On Bellamy's genetic Utopias, see Lipow, Arthur, Authoritarian Socialism in America: Edward Bellamy and the Nationalist Movement (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982), pp. 51–53.Google Scholar

40. Quoted in Kumar, Krishan, Utopia and Anti-Utopia in Modern Times (New York: Basil Blackwell, 1987), p. 133.Google Scholar

41. On the success and influence of the novel in the United States and worldwide, see Kumar, , Utopia and Anti-Utopia, pp. 133–37Google Scholar; Lipow, , Authoritarian Socialism, pp. 30–33Google Scholar; Bowman, , Year 2000, pp. 117–22Google Scholar; Thomas, John L., Alternative America: Henry George, Edward Bellamy, Henry Demarest Lloyd and the Adversary Tradition (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1983), pp. 262–66Google Scholar; Bowman, Sylvia E. et al. , Edward Bellamy Abroad: An American Prophet's Influence (New York: Twayne, 1962)Google Scholar; and Sadler, Elizabeth, “One Book's Influence: Edward Bellamy's Looking Backward,” New England Quarterly 17 (12 1944): 538–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar. In New Zealand, see Roth, Herbert, “New Zealand,” in Edward Bellamy Abroad, pp. 231–57Google Scholar; and McArthur, Margaret J., “Collectivist Tracts and Altruistic Sermons: A Study of ‘Socialism’ in Late Nineteenth Century New Zealand” (M.A. Thesis, University of Canterbury, 1981), pp. 24–51.Google Scholar

42. New Zealand Tablet, 05 30, 1890, p. 18.Google Scholar

43. On the “horizon of expectations” and the reception of a text, see Holub, , Reception Theory, p. 59Google Scholar. On utopianism and the historical moment, see Kiser, Edgar and Drass, Kriss A., “Changes in the Core of the World System and the Production of Utopian Literature in Great Britain and the United States, 1883–1975,” American Sociological Review 52 (04 1987): 286–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Shor, Francis, “Utopianism,” in The Encyclopedia of the American Left, ed. Buhle, Mari Jo, Buhle, Paul, and Georgakas, Dan (New York: Garland, 1990), pp. 810–11Google Scholar. On the proliferation of Utopian literature and its relationship to the historical conditions of late-19th-Century America, see Pfaelzer, Jean, The Utopian Novel in America, 1886–1900 (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1984)Google Scholar; Roemer, Kenneth M., The Obsolete Necessity: America in Utopian Writings, 1888–1900 (Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press, 1976)Google Scholar; and Rooney, Charles J. Jr., Dreams and Visions: A Study of American Utopias, 1865–1917 (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood, 1985).Google Scholar

44. Bennett, Tony, “Text Readings, Reading Formations,” in Modern Literary Theory: A Reader, ed. Rice, Philip and Waugh, Patricia (London: Edward Arnold, 1989), p. 216Google Scholar. On the text as historical artifact and its semiological decoding, see White, Hayden, “The Context in the Text: Method and Ideology in Intellectual History,” in Content of the Form, p. 210.Google Scholar

45. On the concept of the enscribed audience, see Suleiman, Susan R., “Introduction,” in Reader in the Text, pp. 12, 15.Google Scholar

46. Bennett, Tony, “Texts in History: The Determinations of Readings and Their Texts,” in Post-Structuralism and the Question of History, ed. Attridge, Derek, Bennington, Geoff, and Young, Robert (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), p. 70Google Scholar. Also, see Bennett, , “Text, Readings,” p. 208.Google Scholar

47. Thomas, , Alternative America, p. 56.Google Scholar

48. Quoted in Frow, , Marxism and Literary Form, p. 72.Google Scholar

49. On the Nationalist movement as a formation of the educated middle class and professional intellectual elite, see Lipow, , Authoritarian SocialismGoogle Scholar. Unfortunately, many of Lipow's insights are undermined by a tendentious and post hoc reading of Looking Backward. For other discussions of the Nationalist movement, see Macnair, Everett W., Edward Bellamy and the Nationalist Movement, 1889–1894 (Milwaukee: Fitzgerald, 1957)Google Scholar; Bowman, , Year 2000, pp. 123–30Google Scholar; and Thomas, , Alternative America, pp. 266–76.Google Scholar

50. Bellamy, , Looking Backward, p. 178Google Scholar. All further references to page numbers in Looking Backward are cited in the text.

51. Quoted in Lipow, , Authoritarian Socialism, p. 108Google Scholar. On the role of administrative efficiency for curing the industrial illnesses of late-19th-Century America, see Kasson, John F., Civilizing the Machine: Technology and Republican Values in America, 1776–1900 (New York: Penguin, 1976), p. 198.Google Scholar

52. On liberal collectivism, evolutionary thought, and the new organicism, see Freeden, , New Liberalism, esp. pp. 94–116Google Scholar. On the obsession with the physical and mental health of American society in the late 19th Century, see Lears, , No Place of Grace, esp. pp. 47–58Google Scholar; and Smith-Rosenberg, , Disorderly Conduct, pp. 259–65.Google Scholar

53. On the “new social entrepreneurs” and the collectivist ideal, see Gilbert, James, Designing the Industrial State: The Intellectual Pursuit of Collectivism in America, 1880–1940 (Chicago: Quadrangle, 1972), p. 16Google Scholar. On the collectivist appeal of Looking Backward and Nationalism to a declassed elite, see Lipow, , Authoritarian Socialism, passim.Google Scholar

54. Pfaelzer, , Utopian Novel, pp. 24–25.Google Scholar

55. On civil service reform, see Baxter's comments quoted in Lipow, , Authoritarian Socialism, p. 207Google Scholar. On the role of an intellectual elite in cementing the moral/intellectual bloc and ideological hegemony, see Gramsci, , Prison Notebooks, esp. pp. 5, 60Google Scholar. Also, see Adamson, , Hegemony and Revolution, esp. pp. 143–45Google Scholar; Buci-Glucksmann, , Gramsci and the State, pp. 19–46Google Scholar; and Femia, , Gramsci's Political Thought, esp. pp. 130–32.Google Scholar

56. Richmond, Maurice W., “Looking Backward,” The Monthly Review 1 (09 1889): 449Google Scholar. Further page numbers are noted in the text.

57. Since there is no extensive biography of Richmond, Maurice, these biographical highlights were culled from The Cyclopedia of New Zealand, vol. 1 (Wellington: R. E. Owen, 1896), p. 476Google Scholar; letters in The Richmond-Atkinson Papers, vol. 2, ed. Scholefield, Guy H. (Wellington: R. E. Owen, 1960), esp. p. 535Google Scholar; and the Mary E. Richmond collection (Maurice's mother) in the Turnbull Archives. In the Mary Richmond papers, I found two formal notices from Maurice's Club indicating that the March 31 and April 28, 1890, meetings would discuss Looking Backward.

58. On Morley and the radical liberals adoption of “socialism,” see Wolfe, , From Radicalism to Socialism, pp. 70–71Google Scholar; and Barker, Michael, Gladstone and Radicalism: The Reconstruction of Liberal Policy in Britain, 1885–1894 (Brighton, U.K.: Harvester, 1975), pp. 175–86Google Scholar. On Morley's speech to the Eighty Club, see Barker, , Gladstone and Radicalism, pp. 183–84Google Scholar. Morley's speech to the Eighty Club in England was given prominence in the New Zealand newspapers. See the Otago Daily Times, 02 8, 1890, p. 2Google Scholar. For the connections between liberalism and socialism in England, see Freeden, , New Liberalism, pp. 49–52Google Scholar. On the overlapping of liberalism and socialism in the 1890s in America, see Lipow, , Authoritarian Socialism, pp. 105–6.Google Scholar

59. See Sinclair, , William Pember ReevesGoogle Scholar; Oliver, , “Reeves, Sinclair”Google Scholar; and McArthur, , “Collectivist Tracts,” pp. 53–75.Google Scholar

60. The series was later collected under Reeves's name as Some Historical Articles on Communism and Socialism (Christchurch: Lyttelton Times, 1890)Google Scholar. All page numbers are references to this text and are cited in the main body of this essay.

61. Reeves, W. P., “A Helpless Spectator,” Zealandia 1 (07 1889): 28–36Google Scholar. All further page references to this story are cited in the text. For an extended discussion of intertextuality, see Frow, , Marxism and Literary Form, pp. 125–69.Google Scholar

62. Sinclair, , William Pember Reeves, p. 97Google Scholar. Sinclair repeats this criticism in A Destiny Apart: “In Zealandia W. P. Reeves wrote a clumsy story about sheep farmers, a polemic against the run-holders” (p. 56). I see the story neither as clumsy nor a polemic against the run-holders. On the political unconscious as an interpretive key to unlocking the ideological discourse in literature, see Jameson, Fredric, The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

63. Freeden, , New Liberalism, p. 118.Google Scholar

64. Oliver, , “Reeves, Sinclair,” p. 171.Google Scholar

65. On the Gramscian role of organizer and mediator of consent, see Buci-Glucksmann, , Gramsci and the State, p. 35Google Scholar. For a portrait of Reeves as a knight of pragmatic progressivism, see Sinclair, , William Pember ReevesGoogle Scholar. For a portrait of Reeves as a zealous radical, see Oliver, , “Reeves, Sinclair.”Google Scholar

66. Emy, , Liberals, Radicals, p. 19Google Scholar. On the English Fabian socialists, see Wolfe, , From Radicalism to Socialism.Google Scholar

67. Quoted in Lipow, , Authoritarian Socialism, p. 91Google Scholar. On Bellamy's influence on the Social Democracy movement, see Fried, Albert, Socialism in America: From the Shakers to the Third International (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1970), pp. 260–67Google Scholar; and Quint, Howard H., The Forging of American Socialism: Origins of the Modern Movement (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1953), pp. 72–102.Google Scholar

68. Quoted in Lipow, , Authoritarian Socialism, p. 91Google Scholar. On the technocratic connections in socialism, see Lipow, , pp. 89–93Google Scholar; and Haber, Samuel, Efficiency and Uplift: Scientific Management in the Progressive Era (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964).Google Scholar

69. Cited in Quint, , Forging of American Socialism, p. 183Google Scholar. For biographical portraits of Wayland, see Quint, , pp. 175–209Google Scholar; and Shore, Elliot, Talkin' Socialism: J. A. Wayland and the Role of the Press in American Radicalism 1890–1912 (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1988)Google Scholar. Way land's autobiography tends to focus more on the later years of his life, especially as editor of the leading socialist newspaper in the United States, the Appeal to Reason. In that autobiography, however, he projects a Bellamy-like vision of future America: “When the public owned industry closes for the day it will be early in the afternoon. There will be public theaters, concerts, libraries, gymnasiums, lectures. There will be enjoyment, happiness, laughter and they will go to their wholesome, healthy supper in bright homes, a happy people, bright laughing children, and father and mothers no longer tormented with the fear of a poverty-stricken-future.” See Wayland, , Leaves of Life: A Story of Twenty Years of Socialist Agitation (Girard, Kan.: Appeal to Reason, 1912), p. 134Google Scholar. On the continuity of populist and socialist ideology and its relationship to the millennial and evangelical politics of the South-west, see Green, James R., Grass-Roots Socialism: Radical Movements in the Southwest, 1895–1943 (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1978), esp. pp. 12–52.Google Scholar

70. On Wayland's evangelical socialism, see Buhle, Paul, Marxism in the United States: Remapping the History of the American Left (London: Verso, 1987), p. 82Google Scholar; and Shore, , Talkin' SocialismGoogle Scholar. On Bellamy, 's “village utopianism,”Google Scholar see Aaron, Daniel, Men of Good Hope: A Story of American Progressivism (New York: Oxford University Press, 1961), pp. 92–132Google Scholar. On Wayland and the Utopian socialist colony of Ruskin, see Egerton, John, Visions of Utopia: Nashoba, Rugby, and the “New Communities” in Tennessee's Past (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1977), pp. 64–86Google Scholar; and Shor, Francis, “Contradictions in the Emergence of American Socialism and the Utopian Ruskin Colony of Tennessee,” Journal of American Culture 12 (Winter 1989): 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

71. Zealandia 5 (11 1889): 296–97.Google Scholar

72. Otago Daily Times, 01 25, 1890, Supplement.Google Scholar

73. Rev. Waddell, Rutherford, “Some Responsibilities of a Young Community,” Zealandia 1 (07 1889): 17–20Google Scholar. For Waddell's role in Dunedin, the sweating controversy, and reform movements, see Olssen, , History of Otago, pp. 99–101Google Scholar; and Collie, J., ed, Rutherford Waddell: Memoir and Addresses (Dunedin: A. H. Reed, 1932).Google Scholar

74. Quoted in Fine, Sidney, Laissez Faire and the General Welfare State (Ann Arbor, Mich.: Ann Arbor Paperback, 1964), p. 299Google Scholar. On Bliss and Christian Socialism, see Mann, Arthur, Yankee Reformers in the Urban Age (New York: Harper, 1966), pp. 90–99Google Scholar. On the social gospel and Christian Socialism in America, see Fine, , Laissez Faire, pp. 169–97Google Scholar; Crunden, Robert M., Ministers of Reform: The Progressives' Achievement in American Civilization, 1889–1920 (New York: Basic, 1982), pp. 41–51Google Scholar; and White, R. C. and Hopkins, C. H., The Social Gospel: Religion and Reform in Changing America (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1976).Google Scholar

75. On Looking Backward as a “religious fable”, see Thomas, , Alternative America, pp. 237–41Google Scholar. On the significance of the industrial army for the Christian social gospel, see Lipow, , Authoritarian Socialism, p. 205Google Scholar. In New Zealand, the radical Christian journalist Arthur Desmond also called for the “Christianisation of environment” in an article entitled “Christ as a Social Reformer.” See Desmond, , “Christ as a Social Reformer,” Zealandia 12 (06 1890): 722.Google Scholar

76. On this paradox of Christian Socialism, see Suvin, Darko, Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1979), p. 191.Google Scholar

77. Pfaelzer, , Utopian Novel, p. 33Google Scholar. Bellamy's religious subtext for Looking Backward followed from such comments in his unpublished manuscripts: the “idea that men being brothers should live together as brothers is as old as the first aspirations of humanity. It is the heart of all religion and the express meaning of Christ.… All I have done in Looking Backward, all I aim … to do is to show certain ways whereby men can realize this ideal” (quoted in Bowman, , Year 2000, p. 189).Google Scholar

78. Quoted in Bowman, et al. , Edward Bellamy Abroad, p. 416Google Scholar. On Willard's commitment to social gospel Christianity, see Bordin, , Frances Willard, pp. 155–74.Google Scholar

79. Quoted in Bowman, , Year 2000, p. 120Google Scholar. For Looking Backward's influence on Willard, see Bordin, , Frances Willard, pp. 145–48.Google Scholar

80. For the positive and critical responses of 19th-century American feminists to Looking Backward, see Bowman, , Year 2000, esp. pp. 274–76Google Scholar; Buhle, Mari Jo, Women and American Socialism, pp. 74–82Google Scholar; Hayden, , Grand Domestic Revolution, esp. pp. 135–37Google Scholar; and Leach, William, “Looking Forward Together: Feminists and Edward Bellamy,” democracy 2 (01 1982): 120–34.Google Scholar

81. Quoted in Hayden, , Grand Domestic Revolution, p. 152.Google Scholar

82. “Material feminism” is Hayden's term. On Able and Richards in the New England Kitchen and Chicago World's Fair, see Hayden, , Grand Domestic Revolution, pp. 158–59Google Scholar. For an overview of the Chicago World's Fair and the role of women in the Fair, see Badger, Reid, The Great American Fair: The World's Columbian Exposition and American Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979).Google Scholar

83. Cited in Clarke, I. F., The Pattern of Expectation, 1644–2001 (London: Jonathan Cape, 1979), p. 163.Google Scholar

84. Canterbury Times, 12 1, 1892, p. 26.Google Scholar

85. For a discussion of the circumscribed radicalism and liberal contradictions of feminism, see Bacchi, , Liberation Deferred?Google Scholar; Buhle, Mari Jo, Women and American SocialismGoogle Scholar; and Leach, , True Love and Perfect Union, esp. pp. 347–51Google Scholar. On the global significance of feminism and women's emancipation, see Evans, , FeministsGoogle Scholar; and Hobsbawm, , Age of Empire, pp. 192–218Google Scholar. On feminism and suffrage in the United States in the 19th Century, see DuBois, , Feminism and SuffrageGoogle Scholar. On feminism and suffrage in New Zealand, see Grimshaw, , Women's SuffrageGoogle Scholar. On women as managers and the junior partners of domestic ideology in America, see Hayden, , Grand Domestic RevolutionGoogle Scholar; and Ehrenreich, Barbara and English, Deidre, For Her Own Good (New York: Anchor Doubleday, 1979), pp. 141–81Google Scholar. In New Zealand, see Olssen, Erik, “Women, Work, and Family: 1880–1926,” in Women in New Zealand Society, esp. pp. 173–81.Google Scholar

86. For an elaboration of the Gramscian perspective on historic bloc and ideological hegemony, see Adamson, , Hegemony and Revolution, pp. 170–79Google Scholar; Buci-Glucksmann, , Gramsci and the State, esp. pp. 275–90Google Scholar; Femia, , Gramsci's Political Thought, pp. 23–60Google Scholar; Salamini, , Sociology of Political Praxis, passimGoogle Scholar; and Lears, , “Cultural Hegemony,” p. 571.Google Scholar

87. On the diffusion and institutionalization of reform in New Zealand in the 1890s, see Hamer, , New Zealand LiberalsGoogle Scholar; and Ash, G. G., “Ideas of Society and State in New Zealand of 1890” (M.A. Thesis, University of Canterbury, 1962)Google Scholar. For a concise overview of the diffusion and displacement of reform in the United States in the 1890s, see Painter, Nell Irvin, Standing at Armageddon: The United States, 1877–1919 (New York: Norton, 1987), esp. pp. 72–169Google Scholar. The splintering of the American socialist movement in the 1890s can also be attributed to the “impossible expectations” loaded onto a “small movement” that tried “to cut through the webs of non-class reform and radicalism.” See Buhle, Paul, Marxism in the United States, p. 24Google Scholar. On imperialism in this period, see LaFeber, , New EmpireGoogle Scholar; on nativism, see Higham, , Strangers in the LandGoogle Scholar; and on racism, primarily in the South, see Williamson, Joel, A Rage for Order (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

88. Coleman, , Progressivism, p. 25Google Scholar. For a concise discussion of the relationship between the state and hegemony, see Adamson, , Hegemony and Revolution, p. 236Google Scholar; and Mouffe, , “Hegemony and Ideology,” p. 201.Google Scholar

89. Quoted in Lipow, , Authoritarian Socialism, p. 23Google Scholar. For Debs's own path to the revolutionary movement, see Salvatore, Nick, Eugene V. Debs: Citizen and Socialist (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1982).Google Scholar

90. For Millar's views on Looking Backward, see Roth, , “New Zealand,” p. 235Google Scholar. On the New Zealand state as the grand employer, see Coleman, , Progressivism, pp. 16–41Google Scholar. Lloyd, Henry Demarest highlighted the role of the New Zealand state as grand employer in his Newest England (New York: Doubleday, Page, 1990), esp. pp. 82–103, 192–232.Google Scholar

91. Hyfler, Robert, Prophets of the Left: American Socialist Thought in the Twentieth Century (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood, 1984), p. 6.Google Scholar

92. See Hamer, , New Zealand Liberals, pp. 31–33, 187–90Google Scholar. Also, see Roth, H., Trade Unions in New Zealand: Past and Present (Wellington: A. H. and A. W. Reed, 1974), pp. 9–24Google Scholar; and Olssen, Erik and Richardson, Len, “The New Zealand Labour Movement, 1880–1920,” in Common Cause: Essays in Australian and New Zealand Labour History, ed. Fry, Eric (Wellington: Allen and Unwin, 1986), esp. pp. 1–7Google Scholar. Millar went on to become a Liberal MP from Dunedin for the years 1893–1914, during which time he held the position of Minister of Labor, 1906–9 and 1909–12. By the time he served his first term as Minister of Labor, the Liberal—Labor alliance had broken down and he became the object of antipathy among many trade unionists.

93. Quoted in Sinclair, , William Pember Reeves, pp. 157–58.Google Scholar

94. See Coleman, , Progressivism, pp. 131–33Google Scholar; Hamer, , New Zealand Liberals, passimGoogle Scholar; Sinclair, , William Pember Reeves, pp. 127–245Google Scholar; and Oliver, , “Reeves, Sinclair.”Google Scholar

95. Coleman, , Progressivism, esp. pp. 76–97.Google Scholar

96. Coleman, , Progressivism, pp. 78–79.Google Scholar