No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Creating Resource Pathways: Considering Opportunities and Funding Sources for Women of Color in the Discipline
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 March 2022
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- A Dialogue on the Status of Junior Women of Color in the Discipline
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association
References
REFERENCES
Bedolla, Lisa García. 2014. “How an Intersectional Approach Can Help to Transform the University.” Politics & Gender 10 (3): 447–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, Megan Ming. 2019. “The Price of Civil Rights: Black Lives, White Funding, and Movement Capture.” Law and Society Review 53 (1): 275–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hero, Rodney. 2015. “Reflections on ‘How Political Science Can Be More Diverse.’” PS : Political Science & Politics 48 (3): 469–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan-Zachery, Julia S. 2004. “Reflections on Mentoring: Black Women and the Academy.” PS: Political Science & Politics 37 (4): 875–77.Google Scholar
Monforti, Lavariega, Jessica, L., and Michelson, Melissa R.. 2008. “Diagnosing the Leaky Pipeline: Continuing Barriers to the Retention of Latinas and Latinos in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41 (1): 161–66.Google Scholar
Monforti, Lavariega, Jessica, L., and Michelson, Melissa R.. 2020. “Building Our Communities: Women of Color Workshops in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 53 (1): 141–43.Google Scholar
Sinclair-Chapman, Valeria. 2015. “Leveraging Diversity in Political Science for Institutional and Disciplinary Change.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48 (3): 454–58.Google Scholar
Sinclair-Chapman, Valeria. 2019. “Rebounding on the Tenure Track: Carving Out a Place of Your Own in the Academy.” PS: Political Science & Politics 52 (1): 52–56.Google Scholar