Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T23:22:17.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Four—Yes, Four—Types of State Primaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

John C. Kuzenski
John C. Kuzenski*
Affiliation:
The Citadel
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Teacher
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , June 1997 , pp. 207 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1997

References

Hadley, Charles D. 1985. “Support for the Return to Closed Primary Elections: Louisiana Party Professionals on the Open Elections System.” Southeastern Political Review 13:167–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazee, Thomas A. 1983. “The Impact of Electoral Reforms: ‘Open Elections’ and the Louisiana Party System.” Publius 13:131–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzenski, John C. 1995. “David Duke and the Nonpartisan Primary.” In David Duke and the Politics of Race in the South, eds. Kuzenski, John C., Bullock, Charles S. III and Gaddie, Ronald Keith. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Bernard H. and Levine, Myron A.. 1996. Urban Politics: Power in Metropolitan America 5th edition, Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock Publishers.Google Scholar
Wyman, Hastings. 1996. Southern Political Report 441 (August), p. 5.Google Scholar