Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T09:01:39.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Myths About the Physical Sciences and Their Implications for Teaching Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2004

Kim Quaile Hill
Kim Quaile Hill
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper describes misconceptions about the physical sciences that are widely held by college students and that pose notable hurdles for appreciating the social sciences as legitimate scientific enterprises. My purpose here is pedagogical, too. In particular, I respond to the persuasive, specific argument in prior scholarship that students must overcome various negative or unconstructive stereotypes about the physical sciences to achieve scientific literacy.

Type
The Teacher
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , July 2004 , pp. 467 - 471
Copyright
© 2004 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arons A. B. 1983. “Achieving Wider Scientific Literacy.” Daedalus 112 (spring): 91– 122.Google Scholar
Bollen Kenneth. 1980. “Issues in the Comparative Measurement of Political Democracy.” American Sociological Review 45 (2): 370– 390.Google Scholar
Cole Stephen. 1983. “The Hierarchy of the Sciences?” American Journal of Sociology 89 (July): 111– 139.Google Scholar
Cowen Ron. 2001. “Nine Planets, or Eight?” Science News 23 (June 9): 360.Google Scholar
Dahl Robert. 1971. Polyarchy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin Charles. 1998. The Evolution of Species. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
Davies Paul. 1995. About Time: Einstein's Unfinished Revolution. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
DeBoer George E. 2000. “Scientific Literacy: Another Look at Its Historical and Contemporary Meanings and Its Relationship to Science Education Reform.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (June): 582– 601.Google Scholar
Delamont Sara, and Paul Atkinson. 2001. “Doctoring Uncertainty: Mastering Craft Knowledge.” Social Studies of Science 31 (February): 87– 107.Google Scholar
Dewey John. 1934. “The Supreme Intellectual Obligation.” Science Education 18 (February): 1– 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckstein Harry, and Ted Robert Gurr. 1975. Patterns of Authority. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Fessenden Ford. 2003. “Studies of Dietary Supplements Come Under Growing Scrutiny.” New York Times(National Edition): June 23, A1.Google Scholar
Hagen Robert M. 1997. Why Aren't Black Holes Black? New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Hill Kim Quaile. 1994. Democracy in the Fifty States. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Jaggers Keith, and Ted Robert Gurr. 1995. “Transitions to Democracy: Tracking Democracy's Third Wave with the POLITY III Data.” Journal of Peace Research 32 (2): 469– 82.Google Scholar
Kerlinger Fred N. 1973. Foundations of Behavioral Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Kuhn Thomas. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laugksch Rudiger C. 2000. “Scientific Literacy: A Conceptual Overview.” Science Education 84 (January): 71– 94.Google Scholar
Lederman Norman G. 1992. “Students' and Teachers' Conceptions of the Nature of Science: A Review of the Research.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29 (April): 331– 359.Google Scholar
Lipset Seymour Martin. 1950. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53 (March): 69– 105.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation. 2002. Science and Engineering Indicators 2002. Washington, D. C., Available at http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/seind02, downloaded June 1, 2003.Google Scholar
Park David. 1998. The Fire Within the Eye. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Powell G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Prewitt Kenneth. 1983. “Scientific Literacy and Democratic Theory.” Daedalus 112 (spring): 49– 64.Google Scholar
Ragsdale Lyn. 1989. “Do Voters Matter? Democracy in Congressional Elections.” In Congressional Politics, ed. Christopher J. Deering. Chicago: Dorsey, 17– 39.Google Scholar
Rutherford F. James, and Andrew Ahlgren. 1990. Science for All Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spielberg Nathan, and Byron D. Anderson. 1995. Seven Ideas That Shook the Universe, second edition. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Weinberg Steven. 2001. Facing Up. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Zeilik Michael. 2002. Astronomy, ninth edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zuckerman Alan. 1991. Doing Political Science. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Zuckerman Harriet A., and Robert K. Merton. 1973. “Age, Aging, and Age Structure in Science.” In Aging and Society, volume three, ed. Matilda White Riley, Marilyn Johnson, and Anne Foner. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 292– 356.Google Scholar