Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T13:10:50.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Negative Consequences of Uncivil Political Discourse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2012

L. Sandy Maisel
L. Sandy Maisel
Affiliation:
Colby College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Congressman Alan West (R-FL) passed the incivility duck test when he described his fellow Floridian Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D) as “the most vile, unprofessional and despicable member of the House of Representatives.” That read like incivility, sounded like incivility, and was universally interpreted to be uncivil, thus it probably was.

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , July 2012 , pp. 405 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Jonathan. 2012. “Being in Congress Loses Its Thrill for Some Lawmakers.” Politico, March 7, accessed March 7, 2012.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin. 1999. “Deliberation, Democracy, and Power,” Kettering Review 17 (1).Google Scholar
Bryce, James. 1919. The American Commonwealth, Vol. II. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Center for Civil Discourse. 2011. Proposal for a National Forum on Civility in American Democracy, submitted to the National Endowment for the Humanities by the the McCormack Graduate School of Policy and Global Studies at the University of Massachusetts, Boston.Google Scholar
Dawson, Matthew Q. 2000. Partisanship and the Birth of America's Second Party, 1796–1800: Stop the Wheels of Government. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai. 1993. Public Policy in a New Key. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James S. 2009. When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbst, Susan. 2010. Rude Democracy: Civility and Incivility in American Politics. Philadelphia: Temple University PressGoogle Scholar
Keller, Bill. 2011. “Asking Candidates Tougher Questions about Faith,” New York Times Magazine, August 28.Google Scholar
Maestas, Cherie D., Fulton, Sarah A., Maisel, L. Sandy, and Stone, Walter J.. 2006. “When to Risk It? Institutions, Ambitions, and the Decision to Run for the U.S. House.” American Political Science Review 100 (2): 195–208.Google Scholar
Maisel, L. Sandy, Maestas, Cherie D., and Stone, Walter J.. 2005. “The Impact of Redistricting on Candidate Emergence.” In Party Lines: Competition, Partisanship, and Congressional Redistricting. ed. Mann, Thomas E. and Cain, Bruce E.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. 1970. “The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 62 (1): 144–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Shuster.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1996. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rovere, Richard H. 1959 (reprint 1996). Senator Joe McCarthy. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Saudi Gazette. 2011. “Incivility Marks Republican Presidential Debate in Iowa,” August 13.Google Scholar
Stone, Walter J., and Maisel, L. Sandy. 2003. “The Not-So-Simple Calculus of Winning: Potential U.S. House Candidates' Nomination and General Election Chances.” Journal of Politics 65 (4): 951–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Walter J., Maisel, L. Sandy, and Lowman, Trevor C.. 2012. “Boehner's Dilemma.” In The Parties Respond: Changes in American Parties and Campaigns, 5th edition. ed. Brewer, Mark D. and Maisel, L. Sandy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 2009. Going to Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zeleny, Jeff, and Parker, Ashley. 2011. “8 From G.O.P. Trade Attacks at Iowa Debate,” New York Times, August 11.Google Scholar
Zengerle, Jason. 2011. “Éric Cantor's America.” New York, October 2.Google Scholar