Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T02:32:19.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A pedagogical review of the vacuum retarded dipole model of pulsar spin down

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2022

J. C. Satherley*
Affiliation:
School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
C. Gordon
Affiliation:
School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
*
Corresponding author: J. C. Satherley, email: jsa113@uclive.ac.nz.

Abstract

Pulsars are rapidly spinning highly magnetised neutron stars. Their spin period is observed to decrease with time. An early analytical model for this process was the vacuum retarded dipole (VRD) by Deutsch (1955, AnAp, 18). This model assumes an idealised star and it finds that the rotational energy is radiated away by the electromagnetic fields. This model has been superseded by more realistic numerical simulations that account for the non-vacuum like surroundings of the neutron star. However, the VRD still provides a reasonable approximation and is a useful limiting case that can provide some qualitative understanding. We provide detailed derivations of the spin down and related electromagnetic field equations of the VRD solution. We also correct typographical errors in the general field equations and boundary conditions used by Deutsch (1955, AnAp, 18).

Type
Review Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Astronomical Society of Australia

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonazzola, S., Mottez, F., & Heyvaerts, J. 2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2007.02539Google Scholar
Contopoulos, I., Kazanas, D., & Fendt, C. 1999, ApJ, 511, 351, arXiv: astro-ph/9903049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, A. J. 1955, AnAp, 18 Google Scholar
Goldreich, P., & Julian, W. H. 1969, ApJ, 157, 869 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, D. J. 2017, Introduction to Electrodynamics (4th edn.; Cambridge University Press), doi: 10.1017/9781108333511 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hessels, J. W. T., 2006, Sci, 311, 1901 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalapotharakos, C., Brambilla, G., Timokhin, A., Harding, A. K., & Kazanas, D. 2018, ApJ, 857, 44 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melatos, A. 1997, MNRAS, 288, 1049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, F., & Li, H. 1999, PhR, 318, 227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, F. C. 1991, Theory of Neutron Star Magnetospheres, Theoretical Astrophysics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
Moebs, W., Ling, S. J., & Sanny, J. 2016, University Physics, Vol. 1 (Houston, Texas: OpenStax)Google Scholar
Pétri, J. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 986 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pétri, J. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 714 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rezzolla, L., Ahmedov, B. J., & Miller, J. C. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 723 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, P. H. 2007, in Encyclopedia of Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism, ed. Gubbins, D. & Herrero-Bervera, E. (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands), 7 Google Scholar
Stratton, J. A. 1941, Electromagnetic Theory, International Series in Physics (McGraw-Hill Book Company, Incorporated)Google Scholar
Travelle, P. A., ed. 2011, Pulsars: Discoveries, Functions, and Formation (Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers)Google Scholar
Van Brummelen, G. 2012, Heavenly Mathematics (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar