Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T04:51:01.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparison of Methods Used for the Calibration of Radiocarbon Dates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

T C Aitchison ,
Morven Leese ,
D J Michczynska ,
W G Mook ,
R L Otlet ,
B S Ottaway ,
M F Pazdur ,
J Van Der Plicht ,
P J Reimer  and
S W Robinson
...Show all authors
T C Aitchison
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QW, UK
Morven Leese
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory, British Museum, London, UK
D J Michczynska
Affiliation:
Radiocarbon Laboratory, Institute of Physics, Silesian Technical University, Krzywoustego 2, 44–100 Gliwice, Poland
W G Mook
Affiliation:
Centrum v Isotopen Onderzoek, Westersingel 34, 9718 CM Groningen, The Netherlands
R L Otlet
Affiliation:
Isotope Measurements Laboratory, Harwell, UK Atomic Energy Authority, Oxfordshire OX11 ORA, UK
B S Ottaway
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK
M F Pazdur
Affiliation:
Radiocarbon Laboratory, Institute of Physics, Silesian Technical University, Krzywoustego 2, 44–100 Gliwice, Poland
J Van Der Plicht
Affiliation:
Centrum v Isotopen Onderzoek, Westersingel 34, 9718 CM Groningen, The Netherlands
P J Reimer
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences & Quaternary Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
S W Robinson
Affiliation:
US Geological Survey, Mail Stop 937, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California, 94025
E M Scott
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QW, UK
Minze Stuiver
Affiliation:
Radiocarbon Laboratory, Institute of Physics, Silesian Technical University, Krzywoustego 2, 44–100 Gliwice, Poland
Bernhard Weninger
Affiliation:
Institut für Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Universität Frankfurt, West Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Current calibration methods for single and replicate 14C dates are compared. Various forms of tabular and graphic output are discussed. Results from all the methods show reasonable agreement but further methodological development and improvements in computer output are required. Comparison of existing techniques for a series of non-contemporaneous dates showed less agreement amongst participants on this issue. We recommend that calibrated dates should be presented as a combination of graphs and ranges, in preference to mean and standard deviation.

Type
III. Global 14C Variations
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 31 , Issue 3: June 20-25, 1988 Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia , 1989 , pp. 846 - 863
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Aitchison, T C, Ottaway, B S and Scott, E M, in press, Statistical treatment of groups of related radiocarbon dates, in Internatl symposium on archaeology and 14C, 2nd: PACT.Google Scholar
Aitchison, T C and Scott, E M, 1987, A review of the methodology for calibrating radiocarbon dates into historical ages: BAR internatl ser 333, p 187–201.Google Scholar
de Jong, A F M, Becker, B and Mook, W G, 1986, High-precision calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, 3930–3230 cal bc, in Stuiver, M and Kra, R S, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 12th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 28, no. 2B, p 939–942.Google Scholar
International Study Group, 1982, An interlaboratory comparison of radiocarbon measurements in tree-rings: Nature, v 298, p 619–623.Google Scholar
Kromer, B, Rhein, M, Bruns, M, Schoch-Fischer, H, Münnich, K O, Stuiver, M and Becker, B, 1986, Radiocarbon calibration data for the 6th to 8th millennia bc, in Stuiver, M and Kra, R S, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 12th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 28, no. 2B, p 954–960.Google Scholar
Lanting, J N and Mook, W G, 1977, The prehistory of the Netherlands in terms of radiocarbon dates: Groningen, Groningen Univ Press.Google Scholar
Leese, M N, 1988, Methods for finding calendar date bands from multiple-valued radiocarbon calibration curves, in Ruggles, C L N and Rahtz, S P Q, eds, Computer and quantitative methods in archaeology: BAR internatl ser 393, p 147–151.Google Scholar
Michczynska, D J, Pazdur, M F and Walanus, A, in press, Bayesian approach to probabilistic calibration of radiocarbon dates, in Internatl syposium on archaeology and 14C: PACT.Google Scholar
Ottaway, B S, 1972, Dispersion diagrams: a new approach to the display of 14C dates: Archaeometry, v 15, p 5–12.Google Scholar
Ottaway, B S, 1986, Neue Radiokarbondaten Altheimer und Chamer Siedlungsplätze in Niederbayern: Archaeol Korrespondenzblatt, v 16, p 141–147.Google Scholar
Pazdur, M F and Michczynska, D J, 1989, Improvement of the procedure for probabilistic calibration of radiocarbon dates: Radiocarbon, this issue.Google Scholar
Pearson, G W and Stuiver, M, 1986, High-precision calibration of the radiocarbon time scale 500–2500 bc, in Stuiver, M and Kra, R S, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 12th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 28, no. 2B, p 839–862.Google Scholar
Pearson, G W, Pilcher, J R, Baillie, M G L B, Corbett, D M and Qua, F, 1986, High-precision 14C measurement of Irish oak to show the natural 14C variation from AD 1840–5210 bc, in Stuiver, M and Kra, R S, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 12th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 28, no. 2B, p 911–934.Google Scholar
Robinson, S W (ms), 1986, A computational procedure for the utilization of high-precision radiocarbon calibration curves: Open-file rept, USGS.Google Scholar
Scott, E M, Baxter, M S and Aitchison, T C, 1983, An assessment of variability in radiocarbon dating, in Methods of low level counting and spectrometry: IAEA, Berlin, p 371–392.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M and Becker, B, 1986, High-precision decadal calibration of radiocarbon time scale, AD 1950–2500, in Stuiver, M and Kra, R S, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 12th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 28, no. 2B, p 863–910.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M and Pearson, G W, 1986, High-precision calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, AD 1950–500 bc, in Stuiver, M and Kra, R S, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 12th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 28, no. 2B, p 805–838.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Pearson, G W and Braziunas, T F, 1986, Radiocarbon age calibration of marine samples back to 9000 cal yr bp, in Stuiver, M and Kra, R S, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 12th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 28, no. 2B, p 980–1021.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M and Reimer, P, 1986, A computer program for radiocarbon age calibration, in Stuiver, M and Kra, R S, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 12th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 28, no. 2B, p 1022–1030.Google Scholar
van der Plicht, J, Mook, W G and Hasper, H, in press, Automatic calibration of radiocarbon dates, in Internatl symposium Archaeology and 14C: PACT.Google Scholar
Vogel, J C, Fuls, A and Visser, E, 1986, Radiocarbon fluctuations during the third millennium bc, in Stuiver, M and Kra, R S, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 12th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 28, no. 2B, p 935–938.Google Scholar
Weninger, B, 1986, High-precision calibration of archaeological radiocarbon dates: Acta Inter-disciplinaria Archaeol, IV, Nitra, p 11–53.Google Scholar
Weninger, B, 1987, ‘Die Radiokarbondaten’ in Korfmann, M, ed, Demircihuyuk: Mainz, Zabern, p 4–13 Google Scholar