Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T08:01:55.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of Radiocarbon Ages from Different Organic Fractions in Tropical Peat Cores: Insights from Kalimantan, Indonesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Raphael A J Wüst ,
Geraldine E Jacobsen ,
Haitse von der Gaast  and
Andrew M Smith
Raphael A J Wüst*
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville QLD 4811, Australia
Geraldine E Jacobsen
Affiliation:
Institute for Environmental Research, ANSTO, PMB 1, Menai NSW 2234, Australia
Haitse von der Gaast
Affiliation:
Institute for Environmental Research, ANSTO, PMB 1, Menai NSW 2234, Australia
Andrew M Smith
Affiliation:
Institute for Environmental Research, ANSTO, PMB 1, Menai NSW 2234, Australia
*
Corresponding author. Email: raphael.wust@jcu.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Various organic fractions of an Indonesian tropical peat deposit were dated using radiocarbon accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). Four different depth layers, deposited during the last 28,000 14C yr, were analyzed and the data compared to bulk sample analyses. The pollen extracts consistently produced the oldest dates. The bulk samples (<250 μm and <100 μm) often yielded the youngest dates. The age difference between the individual fractions depended on the layer depth and hence the true age of the sampled peats. The age discrepancy was highest (∼16,000 14C yr) in the oldest peat material. We interpret this to be a consequence of the input of organic matter over a long period of time, with peat oxidation and/or no peat accumulation during the last glacial maximum (LGM). The age discrepancies were smaller (between 10 and 900 14C yr) for the Holocene peat samples. It was concluded that the pollen extract fraction might be the most reliable fraction for dating tropical peat deposits that are covered by deeply rooting vegetation.

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , 2008 , pp. 359 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Anshari, G, Kershaw, AP, van der Kaars, S, Jacobsen, G. 2004. Environmental change and peatland forest dynamics in the Lake Sentarum area, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Journal of Quaternary Science 19(7):637–55.Google Scholar
Björck, S, Bennike, O, Possnert, G, Wohlfarth, B, Digerfeldt, G. 1998. A high-resolution 14C dated sediment sequence from southwest Sweden: age comparisons between different components of the sediment. Journal of Quaternary Science 13(1):85–9.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackford, J. 2000. Palaeoclimatic records from peat bogs. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15(5):193–8.Google Scholar
Brown, TA, Farwell, GW, Grootes, PM, Schmidt, FH. 1992. Radiocarbon AMS dating of pollen extracted from peat samples. Radiocarbon 34(3):550–6.Google Scholar
Casagrande, DJ, Erchull, LD. 1977. Metals in plants and waters in the Okefenokee swamp and their relationship to constituents found in coal. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 41(9):1391–4.Google Scholar
Clymo, RS, Mackay, D. 1987. Upwash and downwash of pollen and spores in the unsaturated surface layer of Sphagnum-dominated peat. New Phytologist 105(1):175–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, GT, Dugmore, AJ, Shore, JS. 1998. The influence of pretreatment on humic acid yield and 14C age of Carex peat. Radiocarbon 40(1):21–7.Google Scholar
Fairbanks, RG, Mortlock, RA, Chiu, T-C, Cao, L, Kaplan, A, Guilderson, TP, Fairbanks, TW, Bloom, AL, Grootes, PM, Nadeau, M-J. 2005. Radiocarbon calibration curve spanning 0 to 50,000 years BP based on paired 230Th/234U/238U and 14C dates on pristine corals. Quaternary Science Reviews 24(16–17):1781–96.Google Scholar
Flessa, KW, Cutler, AH, Meldahl, KH. 1993. Time and taphonomy: quantitative estimates of time-averaging and stratigraphic disorder in a shallow marine habitat. Paleobiology 19(2):266–86.Google Scholar
Goh, KM. 1978. Removal of contaminants to improve the reliability of radiocarbon dates of peats. European Journal of Soil Science 29(3):340–9.Google Scholar
Gupta, SK, Polach, HA. 1985. Dating material and pretreatment of samples. In: Radiocarbon Dating Practices at ANU. Canberra: Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory, Research School of Pacific Studies, ANU. p 8–27.Google Scholar
Hedges, REM. 1992. Sample treatment strategies in radiocarbon dating. In: Taylor, RE, Long, A, Kra, RS, editors. Radiocarbon After Four Decades. New York: Springer-Verlag; Tucson: Radiocarbon. p 165–83.Google Scholar
Hua, Q, Jacobsen, GE, Zoppi, U, Lawson, EM, Williams, AA, McGann, MJ. 2001. Progress in radiocarbon target preparation at the ANTARES AMS Centre. Radiocarbon 43(2A):275–82.Google Scholar
Hua, Q, Zoppi, U, Williams, AA, Smith, AM. 2004. Small-mass AMS radiocarbon analysis at ANTARES. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:284–92.Google Scholar
Kummel, B, Raup, D. 1965. Handbook of Paleontological Techniques. San Francisco: WH Freeman. 852 p.Google Scholar
Newnham, RM, Vandergoes, MJ, Garnett, MH, Lowe, DJ, Prior, C, Almond, PC. 2007. Test of AMS 14C dating of pollen concentrates using tephrochronology. Journal of Quaternary Science 22(1):37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, M, Klarqvist, M, Bohlin, E, Possnert, G. 2001. Variation in 14C age of macrofossils and different fractions of minute peat samples dated by AMS. The Holocene 11(5):579–86.Google Scholar
Oswald, WW, Anderson, PM, Brown, TA, Brubaker, LB, Hu, FS, Lozhkin, AV, Tinner, W, Kaltenrieder, P. 2005. Effects of sample mass and macrofossil type on radiocarbon dating of arctic and boreal lake sediments. The Holocene 15(5):758–67.Google Scholar
Page, SE, Wüst, RAJ, Weiss, D, Rieley, JO, Shotyk, W, Limin, SH. 2004. A record of Late Pleistocene and Holocene carbon accumulation and climate change from an equatorial peat bog (Kalimantan, Indonesia): implications for past, present and future carbon dynamics. Journal of Quaternary Science 19(7):625–35.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Bertrand, CJH, Blackwell, PG, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Cutler, KB, Damon, PE, Edwards, RL, Fairbanks, RG, Friedrich, M, Guilderson, TP, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, G, Manning, S, Bronk Ramsey, C, Reimer, RW, Remmele, S, Southon, JR, Stuiver, M, Talamo, S, Taylor, FW, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2004. IntCal04 terrestrial radiocarbon age calibration, 0–26 cal kyr BR Radiocarbon 46(3):1029–58.Google Scholar
Rieley, JO, Ahmad-Shah, AA, Brady, MA. 1996. The extent and nature of tropical peat swamps. In: Maltby, E, Immirzi, CP, Safford, RJ, editors. Tropical Lowland Peatlands of Southeast Asia. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature. p 17–54.Google Scholar
Ruppert, L, Neuzil, S, Cecil, C, Kane, J. 1993. Inorganic constituents from samples of a domed and lacustrine peat, Sumatra, Indonesia. In: Cobb, JC, Cecil, CB, editors. Modern and Ancient Coal-Forming Environments. Boulder, Colorado, USA: Geological Society of America, Special Paper. p 83–97.Google Scholar
Sarmaja-Korjonen, K, Kultti, S, Solovieva, N, Väliranta, M. 2003. Mid-Holocene palaeoclimatic and palaeohydrological conditions in northeastern European Russia: a multi-proxy study of Lake Vankavad. Journal of Paleolimnology 30(4):415–26.Google Scholar
Shore, JS, Bartley, DD, Harkness, DD. 1995. Problems encountered with the 14C dating of peat. Quaternary Science Reviews 14(4):373–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shotyk, W. 1988. Review of the inorganic geochemistry of peats and peatland waters. Earth-Science Reviews 25(2):95–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shotyk, W, Weiss, D, Appleby, PG, Cheburkin, AK, Frei, R, Gloor, M, Kramers, JD, Reese, S, van der Knaap, WO. 1998. History of atmospheric lead deposition since 12,370 14C yr BP from a peat bog, Jura Mountains, Switzerland. Science 281(5383):1635–40.Google Scholar
Smith, AM, Petrenko, VV, Hua, Q, Southon, J, Brailsford, G. 2007. The effect of N2O, catalyst, and means of water vapor removal on the graphitization of small CO2 samples. Radiocarbon 49(2):245–54.Google Scholar
Telford, RJ, Heegaard, E, Birk, HJB. 2004. All age-depth models are wrong: but how badly? Quaternary Science Reviews 23(1):1–5.Google Scholar
Vandergoes, MJ, Prior, CA. 2003. AMS dating of pollen concentrates—a methodological study of late Quaternary sediments from south Westland, New Zealand. Radiocarbon 45(3):479–91.Google Scholar
Weiss, D, Shotyk, W, Rieley, J, Page, S, Gloor, M, Reese, S, Martinez-Cortizas, A. 2002. The geochemistry of major and selected trace elements in a forested peat bog, Kalimantan, SE Asia, and its implications for past atmospheric dust deposition. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 66(13):2307–23.Google Scholar
Wüst, RAJ, Bustin, RM. 2003. Opaline and Al-Si phytoliths from a tropical mire system of West Malaysia: abundance, habit, elemental composition, preservation and significance. Chemical Geology 200(3–4):267–92.Google Scholar
Wüst, RAJ, Bustin, RM. 2004. Late Pleistocene and Holocene development of the interior peat-accumulating basin of tropical Tasek Bera, Peninsular Malaysia. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 211(3–4):241–70.Google Scholar
Wüst, RAJ, Rieley, J, Page, S, van der Kaars, S, Wei-Ming, W, Jacobsen, G, Smith, A. 2007. Peatland evolution in Southeast Asia during the last 35,000 years: implications for evaluating their carbon storage potential. In: Rieley, JO, Banks, CJ, Radjagukguk, B, editors. Carbon-Climate-Human Interaction on Tropical Peatland. Proceedings of the International Symposium and Workshop on Tropical Peatland, Yogyakarta, 27–29 August 2007, EU CARBOPEAT and RESTORPEAT Partnership, Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia and University of Leicester, United Kingdom. p 19.Google Scholar
Xu, S, Zheng, G. 2003. Variations in radiocarbon ages of various organic fractions in core sediments from Erhai Lake, SW China. Geochemical Journal 37:135–44.Google Scholar
Zhou, W, Xie, S, Meyers, PA, Zheng, Y. 2005. Reconstruction of late glacial and Holocene climate evolution in southern China from geolipids and pollen in the Dingan peat sequence. Organic Geochemistry 36(9):1272–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar