Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T18:09:37.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Redirecting Inquiry in the Religion-Morality Debate*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Jeffrey Stout
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Religion, Princeton University

Extract

Morality's relation to religion stands among the broad cultural issues that pull people towards philosophy and religious studies. We hope for insight, but what we find when we get there is another matter – a debate on ‘is’ and ‘ought’ with all the marks of a dead end. While the intellectual goals and strategies that led in this direction have elicited little scholarly attention to date, the time and the tools for an effective critique may now be at hand.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 230 note 1 Frankena, , Ethics (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, second edition, 1973), p. 101.Google Scholar

page 231 note 1 ‘A Modified Divine Command Theory of Ethical Wrongness’ (318–47). For an extended critique of Adams, see my Metaethics and the Death of Meaning’, Journal of Religious Ethics, VI, 1 (1978), 118.Google Scholar

page 231 note 2 Frankena, , ‘On Saying the Ethical Thing’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, XXXIX (19651966), 25.Google Scholar

page 233 note 1 ‘“Worthy of Worship”: A Catholic Contribution’ (173203).Google Scholar

page 233 note 2 ‘Does Religious Faith Conflict with Moral Freedom?’ (348–92).

page 233 note 3 See, for example, Rorty, Richard, ‘Cartesian Epistemology and Changes in Ontology’, in Smith, John E. (ed.), Contemporary American Philosophy, second series (New York: 1970), pp. 273–92Google Scholar. Also see Will, Frederick, Induction and Justification: An Investigation of Cartesian Procedure in the Philosophy of Knowledge (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1974).Google Scholar

page 234 note 1 ‘Basic Terms in the Study of Religious Ethics’ (35–77).

page 236 note 1 See Quine, W. V., From a Logical Point of View (New York: Harper & Row, 1961), pp. 2046Google Scholar. Also see Harman, Gilbert, ‘Quine on Meaning and Existence, I’, Review of Metaphysics, XXI (1967), 124 51Google Scholar; and Harman, , Thought (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1973).Google Scholar