Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T03:08:57.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Neurobiological Platform for Moral Values

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2015

Patricia S. Churchland*
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego

Abstract

What we humans call ethics or morality depends on four interlocking brain processes: (1) caring (supported by the neuroendocrine system, and emerging in the young as a function of parental care). (2) Learning local social practices and the ways of others – by positive and negative reinforcement, by imitation, by trial and error, by various kinds of conditioning, and by analogy. (3) Recognition of others' psychological states (goals, feelings etc.). (4) Problem-solving in a social context. These four broad capacities are not unique to humans, but are probably uniquely developed in human brains by virtue of the expansion of the prefrontal cortex.1

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This formulation is based on Chapter 1 of my book, Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells us About Morality (Princeton University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

2 The text that follows is adapted from Chapter 4, The Brains Behind Morality’; Touching a Nerve, (New York: Norton, 2013).Google Scholar

3 Lane, Nick. Chapter 8, Hot Blood’, in Life Ascending: The Ten Great Inventions of Evolution (New York: W. W. Norton, 2009).Google Scholar

4 Quartz, S.R. and Sejnowski, T.J.The Constructivist Brain’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (1999), 4857 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Quartz, S.R. and Sejnowski, T.J. Liars, Lovers and Heroes (NY: William Morrow, 2003).Google Scholar

5 Krubitzer, L. (2007) The magnificent compromise: cortical field evolution in mammals’, Neuron 2 (2007), 201–08Google Scholar; Krubitzer, L. and Kaas, J.The evolution of the neocortex in mammals: how is phenotypic diversity generated?’, Current Opinion in Neurobiology 15 (2005), 444–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Krubitzer, L, Campi, KL, Cooke, DF. ‘All rodents are not the same: A modern synthesis of cortical organization’, Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 78 (2011), 1, 5193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Porges, S.W. and Carter, C.S.Neurobiology and evolution: Mechanisms, mediators, and adaptive consequences of caregiving’, in Self Interest and Beyond: Toward a New Understanding of Human Caregiving, (ed.) Brown, S.L., Brown, R.M., and Penner, L.A. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar; Keverne, E.B.Genomic Imprinting and the Evolution of Sex Differences in Mammalian Reproductive Strategies’, Advances in Genetics 59 (2007): 217–43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Cheng, Y, Chen, C, Lin, C-P, Chou, K-H, Decety, J.Love hurts: An fMRI study’, NeuroImage 51 (2010), 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Carter, C.S., Grippo, A.J., Pournajafi-Nazarloo, H. Ruscio, M., and Porges, S.W.Oxytocin, vasopressin, and sociality’ in Progress in Brain Research 170 (eds) Neumann, Inga D. and Landgraf, Rainer (Mew York: Elsevier, 2008), 331–6Google Scholar; Young, L. and Alexander, B. The Chemistry Between Us: Love, Sex and the Science of Attraction (New York: Penguin, 2012).Google Scholar

9 Broad, K.D, Curley, J.P, and Keverne, E.B, ‘Mother–Infant Bonding and the Evolution of Mammalian Social Relationships’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 361:1476 (2006), 2199–214CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Keverne, E.B. and Curley, J.P.Vasopressin, oxytocin and social behaviour’, Current Opinion in Neurobiology 14 (2004), 777783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

10 Martel, F.L., Nevison, C.M., Rayment, F.D., Simpson, M.J., and Keverne, E.B., Psychoneuroendocrinology 18 (1993), 307321 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Keverne, E.B.Understanding well-being in the evolutionary context of brain development’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 359:1449 (2004), 1349–58CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Broad, K.D, Curley, J.P, and Keverne, E.B, ‘Mother–Infant Bonding and the Evolution of Mammalian Social Relationships’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 361:1476 (2004), 2199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Veenema, A.Toward understanding how early-life social experiences alter oxytocin- and vasopressin-regulated social behaviors’, Hormones and Behavior 61:3 (2012), 304312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

12 Meany, M.J.Maternal care, gene expression, and the transmission of individual differences in stress reactivity across generations’, Annual Review of Neuroscience 24 (2001), 1161–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Goodson, J.L. ‘Deconstructing sociality, social evolution and relevant nonapeptide functions’, Psychoneuroendocrinology (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.12.005).

14 Ibid.

15 Panksepp, J.Feeling the Pain of Social Loss’, Science 302: 5643 (2003), 237–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Panksepp, J. and Biven, L. The Archaeology of Mind: Neuroevolutionary Origins of Human Emotions (New York: Norton, 2012).Google Scholar

16 Churchland, P.S. and Winkielman, P.Modulating social behavior with oxytocin: How does it work? What does it do?’, Hormones and Behavior 61 (2012), 392399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 McCullough, M.E., Churchland, P.S., Mendez, A.J.Problems with measuring peripheral oxytocin: Can data on oxytocin and human behavior be trusted?’, Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews (2013)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed, http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.04.018.

18 On the formation of group identity in children, see Killen, M. and Rutland, A. Children and Social Exclusion: Morality, Prejudice and Group Identity (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013).Google Scholar

19 Brosnan, S.F.A hypothesis of the co-evolution between cooperation and response inequity’, Frontiers in Decision Neuroscience (2011)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed, doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00043.

20 Huttenlocher, P.R. and Dabholkar, A. S.Regional differences in synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex’, Journal of Comparative Neurology 387 (1997), 167178 3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Bourgeois, J.P.Synaptogenesis, heterochrony and epigenesis in mammalian neocortex’, Acta Pediatrica Supplement 422 (1997), 2733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

21 Changeux, J.-P. Neuronal Man (Neew York: Pantheon Books, 1985)Google Scholar.

22 Keverne, E.B. and Curley, J.P.Epigenetics, brain evolution and behavior’, Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 29 (2008), 398412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Peterson, Dale. The Moral Lives of Animals (NY: Bloomsbury Press, 2011).Google Scholar

24 Kitcher, P.S. The Ethical Project (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

25 Hoebel, E.A. The Law of Primitive Man (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1954)Google Scholar, Chapter 5; Everett, D. Don't Sleep, There are Snakes: Life and Language in the Amazonian Jungle (New York: Pantheon Books, 2009).Google Scholar

26 Hoebel, E.A. The Law of Primitive Man (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1954)Google Scholar, Chapter 5.

27 Decety, J.The neuroevolution of empathy’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1231 (2011), 3545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

28 Killen, M. and Smetana, J.G. (eds), Handbook of Moral Development (Mahwah N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Park, Y. and Killen, M.When is peer rejection justifiable? Children's understanding across two cultures’, Cognitive Development 25 (2010): 290–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

29 Schwartz, B. and Sharpe, K. Practical Wisdom: The Right Way to do the Right Thing (NY: Riverhead Books, 2010).Google Scholar