Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T12:09:29.145Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Forgiveness and Atonement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Paul Jensen
Paul Jensen
Affiliation:
Augustana CollegeRock IslandII. 61201–2296U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Christians frequently request God's forgiveness and have their Lord's assurance that if they refuse to forgive they will not be forgiven (Matt. 6:15). Forgiveness is thus integral to Christian moral existence even if life presents few opportunities to forgive those who have genuinely wronged us. This infrequency of opportunity is neither regrettable nor surprising. Sane persons after all do not wish to be routinely wronged so as to be able to forgive regularly. But perhaps the infrequency with which we forgive others helps to explain why we are mystified by the nature of forgiveness.

Type
Research Article
Information
Scottish Journal of Theology , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , January 1993 , pp. 141 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Quinn, Philip L., ‘Christian Atonement and Kantian Justification’, Faith and Philosophy 4 (October 1986): 440CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Quinn 446.

3 Owen, H. P., Christian Theism: A Study in Its Basic Principles, (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1984) 100Google Scholar.

4 Stump, Eleonore, ‘Atonement According to Aquinas’, in Philosophy and the Christian Faith, ed. Morris, T. V. (Notre Dame: Notre Dame UP, 1988) 62Google Scholar.

5 Talbott, Thomas, ‘What Jesus Did For Us’, Reformed Journal 40 (March 1990): 8Google Scholar.

6 Talbott, , ‘What Jesus Did For Us’, 8Google Scholar.

7 Stump, , ‘Atonement According to Aquinas’, 62Google Scholar.

8 Anselm, , Proslogium, XXIII, in St Anselm: Basic Writings, 2nd ed. (La Salle, IL: Open Court Pub. Co., 1990) 75Google Scholar.

9 Stump 87.

10 Stump, , ‘Atonement According to Aquinas’, 62Google Scholar.

11 Quinn, , ‘Christian Atonement’, 445Google Scholar. Quinn credits Foley, G. C. with originating this argument. Cp. Anselm's Theory of Atonement, (New York: Longman's Green and Co., 1909) 155Google Scholar. Cp. Talbott, : ‘The very idea that one person even if morally perfect, might pay the just penalty for the sins of others runs counter to some of our deepest moral intuitions.’ ‘WhatJesus Did for Us’, 8Google Scholar.

12 Quinn 459.

13 Quinn 445–6.

14 Cur Deus Homo, in St Anselm: Basic Writings, 222.

15 I have taken this concept from James Pakcer, who described Christ's atonement in the following way: ‘…Jesus Christ our Lord, moved by a love that was determined to do everything necessary to save us, endured and exhausted the divine judgment…’ ‘What Did the Cross Achieve: The Logic of Penal Substitution’, Tyndale Bulletin 25 (1974): 25Google Scholar.

16 Talbott, , ‘What Jesus Did for Us’, 8Google Scholar.

17 There are, of course, other passages which are equally explicit such as Gal. 3:13 ‘Christ redeemed us by becoming a curse for us…’.

18 Talbott, , ‘What Jesus Did for Us’, 11Google Scholar.

19 Talbott 11.

20 Talbott, , ‘WhatJesus Did for Us’, 10Google Scholar.

21 Talbott 10.

22 Talbott 11.