^{page 1 note 2} Cullmann, Oscar, Salvation in History; trans. Sowers, Sidney G. et al. (London: S.C.M. Press, 1967) pp. 53–54.Google Scholar

^{page 2 note 1} Ed. Halverson, Marvin and Cohen, Arthur, A Handbook of Christian Theology (New York: Meridian Books, 1958), p. 158.Google Scholar

^{page 5 note 1} Cullmann, op. cit., p. 139. Cf. Barth's, Karl remarks about saga and legend dealing with ‘real history’ (Church Dogmatics, III/3 (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, Clark, 1961,), pp. 374–375.Google Scholar

^{page 5 note 2} This statement can be supported by reference to representatives of the five approaches characteristic of Old Testament study in the twentieth century: (i) the ‘History of Religions’ approach; (ii) the ‘Literary Analysis’ approach (Julius Wellhausen); (iii) the ‘Archaeological Discoveries’ approach (W. F. Albright, John Bright); (iv) the ‘Biblical Theology’ approach (Walter Eichrodt, Edmond Jacob, Norman Snaith); (v) the ‘History of Tradition’ approach (Albrecht Alt, Martin Noth, Gerhard von Rad, G. Ernest Wright.)

^{page 7 note 1} Cullmann, op. cit., p. 151.

^{page 7 note 2} Exodus 1.6–8.

^{page 9 note 1} Cullmann, op. cit., p. 78.

^{page 9 note 2} ibid., pp. 124–5.

^{page 10 note 1} op. cit., vol. IV, part 3, pp. 183–4.

^{page 10 note 2} Wollebius, Johannes, Christianas Theologiae Compendium (Basel, 1626), 139Google Scholar; cited by Heppe, Heinrich, Reformed Dogmatics, rev. and ed. Bizer, Ernst, trans. Thomson, G. T. (London; Allen and Unwin, 1950), p. 530.Google Scholar