Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T04:30:17.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Updating PAJID Scores for State Supreme Court Justices (1970–2019)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2023

David A. Hughes*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Auburn University at Montgomery, Montgomery, AL, USA
Teena Wilhelm
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
Xuan Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
*
Corresponding author: David A. Hughes; Email: david.hughes@aum.edu

Abstract

We build upon Brace, Langer, and Hall’s (2000, The Journal of Politics 62: 387–413) original measure of American state supreme court justice ideology – the PAJID scores. To do so, we gather new data on 1,666 state supreme court justices who served between 1970 and 2019 and update the PAJID scores throughout this period. Testing indicates that PAJID scores are a valid measure of state supreme court justices’ policy preferences and compare favorably, though less efficiently, to others such as Bonica and Woodruff (2015, The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 31: 472–98) and Windett, Harden, and Hall (2015, Political Analysis 23: 461–9). Given limited data availability for other ideological measures pre-1990 and post-2010, we conclude that these updated PAJID scores should prove attractive to scholars studying state courts during these periods and among those who desire additional state supreme court ideological data for robustness checks.

Type
Short Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the State Politics and Policy Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berry, William D., Fording, Richard C., Ringquist, Evan J., Hanson, Russell L., and Klarner, Carl E.. 2010. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the U.S. States: A Re-appraisal.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 10 (2): 117–35.Google Scholar
Berry, William D., Ringquist, Evan J., Fording, Richard C., and Hanson, Russell L.. 1998. “Measuring Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 327–48.Google Scholar
Bonica, Adam. 2014. “Mapping the Ideological Marketplace.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (2): 367–86.Google Scholar
Bonica, Adam, and Woodruff, Michael J.. 2015. “A Common-Space Measure of State Supreme Court Ideology.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 31 (3): 472–98.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul, Langer, Laura, and Hall, Melinda Gann. 2000. “Measuring the Preferences of State Supreme Court Judges.” The Journal of Politics 62 (2): 387413.Google Scholar
Curry, Todd A., and Hurwitz, Mark S.. 2016. “Strategic Retirements of Elected and Appointed Justices: A Hazard Model Approach.” The Journal of Politics 78 (4): 1061–75.Google Scholar
Hughes, David. 2023. “Replication Data for: Updating PAJID Scores for State Supreme Court Justices (1970–2019).” UNC Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:Bucuv6SLPydlhNDBDN8Zyw== [fileUNF]. doi:10.15139/S3/M6U77I.Google Scholar
Windett, Jason H., Harden, Jeffrey J., and Hall, Matthew E. K.. 2015. “Estimating Dynamic Ideal Points for State Supreme Courts.” Political Analysis 23 (3): 461–9.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Hughes Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: File

Hughes et al. supplementary material

Appendix

Download Hughes et al. supplementary material(File)
File 23.8 KB