Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T03:15:11.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Collusion in clinical supervision: literature review and case study in self-reflection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Derek L. Milne ,
Caroline Leck  and
Nasim Z. Choudhri
Derek L. Milne*
Affiliation:
Newcastle University, and Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Trust
Caroline Leck
Affiliation:
Newcastle University, and Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Trust
Nasim Z. Choudhri
Affiliation:
Newcastle University, and Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Trust
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr D. L. Milne, School of Psychology, Newcastle University, 4th Floor, Ridley Building, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK. (email: d.l.milne@ncl.ac.uk)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interpersonal dynamics are a recurring impediment to effective clinical supervision and can lead to phenomena like collusion between the supervisor and supervisee. Collusion involves both supervisor and supervisee engaging in safety behaviours that serve to conveniently avoid and escape from difficult topics and challenging methods. Whilst minimizing the short-term threat to supervisor and supervisee, collusion will tend to undermine the effectiveness of supervision and limit significantly its long-term value to patients. In order to consider how best to address collusion, we review the cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) and related literature on collusion, focusing on how it has been formulated and managed. We then provide a case study featuring a supervisor who was colluding with the supervisee's avoidance behaviours (i.e. filling supervision sessions with superficial reflections on his casework) by not challenging these reflections or moving to another learning mode (e.g. experimenting). We develop a CBT formulation of this pattern of supervision as part of the self-reflection process, led by a consultant. Self-reflection appeared to be a useful tool for improving the supervisor's understanding of this dysfunctional process, and strengthened the supervisor's confidence in utilizing relevant skills in the future.

Keywords

Clinical supervisioncollusionself-reflection
Type
Education and supervision
Information
the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 106 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommended follow-up reading

Safran, JD, Muran, JC, Stevens, C, Rothman, M (2008). A relational approach to supervision. In: Casebook for Clinical Supervision: A Competency-Based Approach (ed. Falender, C. A. and Shafranske, E.), pp.137–158. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Bambling, M, King, R, Raue, P, Schweitzer, R, Lambert, W (2006). Clinical supervision: its influence on client-rated working alliance and client symptom reduction in the brief treatment of major depression. Psychotherapy Research 16, 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett-Levy, J, Thwaites, R (2007). Self and self-reflection in the therapeutic relationship. In: The Therapeutic Relationship in Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (ed.Gilbert, P. and Leahy, R. L.), pp. 255–281. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bennett-Levy, J, Turner, F, Beaty, T, Smith, M, Patterson, B, Farmer, S (2001). The value of self-practice of cognitive therapy techniques and self-reflection in the training of cognitive therapists. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 29, 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berne, E (1964). Principles of transactional analysis. Current Psychiatric Therapies 25, 35–45.Google Scholar
Binder, JL, Strupp, HH (1997). Supervision of psychodynamic psychotherapies. In: Handbook of Psychotherapy Supervision (ed.Watkins, C. E.), pp. 44–62. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
BABCP (2006). Supervisor and training accreditation. Accrington: British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2004). Organising and Delivering Psychological Therapies. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Hagler, P, Casey, PL (1990). Games supervisors play in clinical supervision. Journal of American Speech-Language Hearing Association, February, 53–56.Google Scholar
Hawkins, P, Shohet, R (2000). Supervision in the Helping Professions. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
HPC (2007). Standards of Proficiency for Applied Psychologists. London: Health Professions Council.Google Scholar
Kadushin, A (1968). Games people play in supervision. Social Work 13, 23–32.Google Scholar
Kovacs, V (1936). Training and control analysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 17, 346–354.Google Scholar
Liese, BS, Beck, JS (1997). Cognitive therapy supervision. In: Handbook of Psychotherapy Supervision (ed. Watkins, C. E.), pp. 114–133. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lomax, JW, Andrews, LB, Burruss, JW, Moorey, S (2005). Psychotherapy supervision. In: Oxford Textbook of Psychotherapy (ed.Gabbard, G. O., Beck, J. S. and Holmes, J.), pp. 495–503. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucock, MP, Hall, P, Noble, R (2006). A survey of influences on the practice of psychotherapists and clinical psychologists in training in the UK. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy 13, 123–130.Google Scholar
McIntosh, N, Dircks, A, Fitzpatrick, J, Shuman, C (2006). Games in clinical genetic counselling supervision. Journal of Genetic Counselling 15, 225–243.Google Scholar
Milne, DL (2008). CBT supervision: from reflexivity to specialisation. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 6, 779–786.Google Scholar
Milne, DL (2009). Evidence-Based Clinical Supervision: Principles and Practice. Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milne, D, Gracie, J (2001). The role of the supervisee: 20 ways to facilitate clinical supervision. Clinical Psychology 5, 13–15.Google Scholar
Milne, D, James, I (2000). A systematic review of effective cognitive-behavioural supervision. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 39, 111–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milne, DL, Westerman, C (2001). Evidence-based clinical supervision: rationale and illustration. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy 8, 444–445.Google Scholar
Nursing and Midwifery Council (2006). Clinical Supervision. A-Z Advice Sheet. London: NMC.Google Scholar
Perris, C (1993). Stumbling blocks in the supervision of cognitive psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy 1, 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perris, C (1994). Supervising cognitive psychotherapy and training supervisors. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy 8, 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proctor, B (1988). A cooperative exercise in accountability. In: Enabling and Ensuring (ed. Marken, M. and Payne, M.), pp. 21–34. Leicester: Leicester National Youth Bureau and Council for Education and Training in Youth and Community Work.Google Scholar
Safran, JD, Muran, JC, Stevens, C, Rothman, M (2008). A relational approach to supervision. In: Casebook for Clinical Supervision: A Competency-Based Approach (ed.Falender, C. A. and Shafranske, E.), pp.137–158. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scaife, J (2001). Supervision in the Mental Health Professions. Hove: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
Townend, M, Iannetta, L, Freeston, MH (2002). Clinical supervision in practice: a survey of UK cognitive-behavioural psychotherapists accredited by the BABCP. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 30, 485–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, LS (1978). Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Zorga, S (2002). Supervision: The process of life-long learning in social and educational professions. Journal of Interprofessional Care 16, 265–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.