Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T08:41:15.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Collective Bargaining as a Minimum Employment Standard

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Roy J. Adams
Roy J. Adams*
Affiliation:
Professor Emeritus, McMaster University, University of Saskatchewan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Throughout the English-speaking world, collective bargaining has commonly been considered to be an option for workers discontent with the default system of management-determined conditions of work. In this article it is argued that, as a universally acclaimed human right, collective bargaining should be considered a minimum condition for everyone employed under standardised conditions of work. The government policy of offering workers a choice to bargain or to refrain from bargaining, in effect in countries such as the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, does not meet that standard. Just as the equity goal of governments is the absence of inequality based on traits such as sex and colour, the government bargaining policy goal should be universal collective bargaining. Anything short of universality should be considered a social problem in search of a more effective policy solution.

Keywords

J53J58J88Collective bargaininggovernment employment relations policyhuman rightslabour standardsvoluntarism
Type
Symposium
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 22 , Issue 2: Minimum Labour Standards and Their Enforcement , July 2011 , pp. 153 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1948) ‘The I.L.O. and the problem of freedom of association and industrial relations’, International Labour Review, 58(5), pp. 575–600.Google Scholar
Adams, R. J. (1995) Industrial Relations Under Liberal Democracy, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, SC.Google Scholar
Adams, R. J. (2001a) ‘Implications of the international human rights in employment consensus for management teaching and practice’, Journal of Comparative International Management, 4(1), pp. 22–32.Google Scholar
Adams, R. J. (2001b) ‘Choice or voice? Rethinking American labor policy in light of the international human rights consensus’, Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal, 5(2), pp. 521–548.Google Scholar
Adams, R. J. (2008a) ‘The Supreme Court, collective bargaining and international law: A reply to Brian Langille’, Canadian Labour and Employment Law Journal, 14(1), pp. 111–121.Google Scholar
Adams, R. J. (2008b) ‘I-mode, the new language of workers' rights, A rejoinder to Larry Savage’, Just Labour, 12, pp. 76–86.Google Scholar
Atleson, J., et al (2008a) International Labour Law, Cases and Materials on Workers' Rights in the Global Economy, The Labor Law Group, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
Atleson, J., et al (2008b) Documentary Supplement to International Labor Law, The Labor Law Group, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
Bain, G. (1970) The Growth of White Collar Unionism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bamber, G., Lansbury, R., Wailes, N. (2011) International and Comparative Industrial Relations, Sage, London, Fifth edition.Google Scholar
de la Cruz, H. Bartolomei, von Potobsky, G., Swepston, L. (1996) The International Labour Organization, the International Standards System and Basic Human Rights, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
Bogg, A. (2009) The Democratic Aspects of Trade Union Recognition, Hart Publishing, Oxford.Google Scholar
Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations (1983) Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining, International Labour Office, Geneva.Google Scholar
Committee on Freedom of Association (2006) Freedom of Association, Digest of Decisions and Principles of the Freedom of Association Committee of the Governing Body of the ILO, International Labour Office, Geneva, Fifth revised edition.Google Scholar
Creighton, B. (2010) Good faith bargaining under the Fair Work Act: Striking a Balance, Discussion Paper for the Business Council of Australia.Google Scholar
Dukes, R. (2008) ‘The Statutory Recognition Procedure 1999: No bias in favour of recognition?’ Industrial Law Journal, 37(3), pp. 236–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsyth, A. (2010) The impact of ‘good faith’ obligation on collective bargaining practices and outcomes in Australia, Canada and the USA, Working Paper No. 17, Monash University Workplace and Corporate Law Research Group, June.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
France, D. (2001) ‘Employers and the International Labour Organization’, in Blanpain, R., Engels, C. (eds) The ILO and the Social Challenges of the 21 st century, Kluwer Kaw International, The Hague.Google Scholar
Gravel, E., Duplessis, I., Gernigon, B. (2002) The Committee on Freedom of Association: Its Impact over 50 Years, International Labour Office, Geneva.Google Scholar
Mantouvalou, V. (2010) ‘Is there a human right not to be a trade union member? Labour rights under the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Fenwick, C., Novitz, T. (eds) Human Rights at Work: Perspectives of Law and Regulation, Hart Publishing, Oxford.Google Scholar
Novitz, T. (2003) International and European Protection of the Right to Strike, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Valticos, R., von Potobsky, G. (1995) International Labour Law, Kluwer, Deventer, NL.Google Scholar