¹ Les origines du droit international (Brussels-Paris 1894) iv. See also his Études de droit international et de droit politique (2 vols.; Brussels 1896, 1901) and Le droit international (3 vols.; Brussels 1912). A convenient summary of Nys' views on the pre-Grotian origins of international law can be found in his introduction to Vitoria's De Indis et de jure belli relectiones (Washington, D.C. 1917; reprinted New York 1964) 55–100.Google Scholar

² Nys, Origines 7.Google Scholar

³ Ibid. 11.Google Scholar

⁴ Ibid. 144.Google Scholar

⁵ Ibid. 150.Google Scholar

⁶ Ibid. 154–55.Google Scholar

⁷ Ibid. 159.Google Scholar

⁸ Nussbaum, Arthur, A Concise History of the Law of Nations (rev. ed. New York 1954) 293–94.Google Scholar

⁹ Vanderpol, A., Le Droit de guerre d'après les théologiens et les canonistes du moyen-ǎge (Paris-Brussels 1911).Google Scholar

¹⁰ Regout, Robert, La doctrine de la guerre juste (Paris 1935) 301.Google Scholar

¹¹ Vanderpol, 151.Google Scholar

¹² Ibid. 155.Google Scholar

¹³ Holland, Thomas E., Studies in International Law (Oxford 1898) 1–39.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Ibid. 2.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Ibid.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Ibid. 22.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Ibid. 44.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Ibid. 44, 56. It should be noted, however, that Holland's references to the canonists are filled with minor errors which suggest that his knowledge of the sources must have been slight. For example, he refers to ‘the title De Homocidio in the sixth book of the Decretals' when in fact it is in the fifth and last book.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Vanderpol, 154–55.Google Scholar

²⁰ , R. W. and Carlyle, A. J., A History of Mediaeval Political Theory in the West (6 vols.; Edinburgh and London 1903–1936) II viii.Google Scholar

²¹ Oppenheim, L., International Law: A Treatise (2 vols.; 2nd ed. London and New York 1912) I 54–55, 83–84, 86.Google Scholar

²² On Scott's life and career, see: Finch, G. A., ‘James Brown Scott, 1866–1943,’ American Journal of International Law [AJIL] 38 (1944) 183–217; and F. R. Coudert, ‘An Appreciation of James Brown Scott,’ ibid. 37 (1943) 559–61.Google Scholar

²³ Letter to Woodward, Robert S. Dr., President of the Carnegie Institution, AJIL 3 (1909) 701–07 at 703.Google Scholar

²⁴ Scott, J. B., Preface to Vitoria, De Indis p. 6.Google Scholar

²⁵ John of Legnano, Tractatus de bello, de represaliis et de duello, ed. Holland, T. E. (Oxford 1917).Google Scholar

²⁶ Nys, Ernest, ‘The Development and Formation of International Law,’ AJIL 6 (1912) 1–29, 279–315. See also Amos Hershey, ‘The History of International Relations During Antiquity and the Middle Ages,’ ibid. 5 (1911) 901–33; and ‘History of International Law Since the Peace of Westphalia,’ ibid. 6 (1912) 30–69; Sherman, G. E., ‘The Nature and Sources of International Law,’ ibid. 15 (1921) 349–60.Google Scholar

²⁷ Blach, T. W., ‘Albericus Gentilis,’ AJIL 5 (1911) 665–79; F. F. Abbott, ‘Alberico Gentili and his Advocatio Hispanica,’ ibid. 10 (1916) 737–48.Google Scholar

²⁸ Preface to Vitoria, De Indis p. 5.Google Scholar

²⁹ Scott, J. B., The Spanish Conception of International Law and of Sanctions (Washington, D.C. 1934) 51. Scott's other works include: The Spanish Origin of International Law (Washington, D.C. 1928); The Catholic Conception of International Law (Washington, D.C. 1934); The Spanish Origin of International Law: Francisco de Vitoria and his Law of Nations (Oxford 1934).Google Scholar

³⁰ See for example, Spanish Origin (1934) 71, 118.Google Scholar

³¹ Vitoria, De Indis 55.Google Scholar

³² Nussbaum (cit. supra n. 8) 304.Google Scholar

³³ Scott, Spanish Origin (1934) 98.Google Scholar

³⁴ It might be noted here that several of the authors discussed indicated a debt to the Carnegie Endowment. These include Eppstein, John, Hanke, Lewis, and Moreau-Reibel, Jean.Google Scholar

³⁵ Brierly, J. L., The Law of Nations (Oxford 1928) 19.Google Scholar

³⁶ Ibid. (5th ed. 1955) 36.Google Scholar

³⁷ Holland (cit. supra n. 13), 20.Google Scholar

³⁸ Lorimer, James, The Institutes of the Law of Nations (1883) I 71, quoted in Nys, Introduction to De Indis, p. 99.Google Scholar

³⁹ Wright, Herbert F., Francisci de Victoria: De iure belli relectio (Washington, D.C. 1916).Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Ibid. 17, 21.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Ibid. 20.Google Scholar

⁴² Ibid. 21.Google Scholar

⁴³ Ibid. 17.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ See Wright, H. F., ‘International Law: Old Wine in New Bottles,’ Catholic World 132 (1931–1932) 513–21; ‘Catholic Founders of International Law,’ Records of the American Catholic Historical Society of Philadelphia 45 (1934) 119–43. See also his ‘The Divorce of Henry VIII,’ American Catholic Quarterly Review 44 (1919) 556–65; ‘Origin of American Aborigines: A Famous Controversy,’ Catholic Historical Review 3 (1917–1918) 257–75; and ‘St. Augustine and International Peace,’ Thought 6 (1931) 399–416.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Rupp, Max G., ‘Hugo Grotius and his Place in the History of International Peace,’ Catholic Historical Review 4 (1924–1925) 358–66. See also A. H. Chroust, ‘Hugo Grotius and the Scholastic Natural Law Tradition,’ New Scholasticism 17 (1943) 101–33.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Pfeiffer, Nicolaus, ‘The Doctrine of International Law According to Francis de Victoria O.P.,’ Catholic Historical Review 6 (1926–1927) 185–224. See also G. F. Benkert, The Thomistic Conception of an International Society (Washington, D.C. 1942).Google Scholar

⁴⁷ McKenna, C. H., ‘Francisco de Vitoria: Father of International Law,’ Studies 21 (1932) 635–48 at 647.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Eppstein, John, The Catholic Tradition of the Law of Nations (Washington, D.C. 1935) xviii. For a similar point of view by an author who was not a Catholic, see: R. F. Wright, Medieval Internationalism: The Contribution of the Medieval Church to International Law and Peace (London 1930).Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Wright, H. F., in New Scholasticism 9 (1935) 369–70 at 369.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Salvador de Madariaga, Spain (New York 1930) 48, cited in Merriman, R. B., Rise of the Spanish Empire (4 vols.; New York 1918–1934; reprinted New York 1962) IV 484. Madariaga gives no indication in the text as to the source of this opinion, but in a bibliographical note at the end he cites the Classics edition of Vitoria's De Indis, suggesting the possibility that he was influenced by Nys' views. See Spain 484.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Parry, J. H., The Spanish Theory of Empire in the Sixteenth Century (Cambridge 1940) 19.Google Scholar

⁵² Ibid. 19–20.Google Scholar

⁵³ Parry has not essentially changed his views concerning the importance of Vitoria and the other pre-Grotians. See his The Spanish Seaborne Empire (New York 1966) 138–39, 142.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Hanke, Lewis, The Spanish Struggle for Justice in the Conquest of America (Philadelphia 1949; reprinted Boston 1965) 28.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Ibid. 1.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Ibid. 151.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Fenwick, C. G., AJIL 29 (1935) 183–84 at 184.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Ibid.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Nussbaum 113.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Ibid. 301.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Ibid. 298.Google Scholar

⁶² Ibid.Google Scholar

⁶³ Ibid. 80–81.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Ibid. 297.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ It should be noted that Nussbaum's views on the significance of Vitoria and Suárez and the polemical tone of his criticism of Scott were in turn criticized as being too extreme. See the review by Kunz, J. L., AJIL 50 (1956) 448–49. Ironically, one reviewer of the first edition (1947) declared that ‘Victoria and Suarez are masterly portrayed in the restricted space of some fifteen pages.’ See Freeman, A. V., AJIL 43 (1949) 603–05 at 603.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Regout, 9–10, 301.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Ibid. 59–60.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Ibid. 15.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Moreau-Reibel, Jean, ‘Le droit de société interhumaine et le jus “gentium”: Essai sur les origines et le développement des notions jusqu’à Grotius,’ Académie de droit international, Recueil des cours 77 (1950) 481–597 at 524.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Ibid. 523–24.Google Scholar

⁷¹ Ibid. 514.Google Scholar

⁷² Ibid. 486.Google Scholar

⁷³ Ibid. 524.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Ibid. 531.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Ibid. 532.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Belch, Stanislaus, Paulus Vladimiri and His Doctrine Concerning International Law and Politics (2 vols.; The Hague 1965) I 742.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Ibid.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Ibid. 751.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Ibid. 75.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Muldoon, J., ‘Extra ecclesiam non est imperium : The Canonists and the Legitimacy of Secular Power,’ Studia Gratiana 9 (1960) 553–80.Google Scholar

⁸¹ Muldoon, J., ‘A Canonistic Contribution to the Formation of International Law,’ The Jurist 28 (1968) 265–79.Google Scholar

⁸² Innocent IV's sponsorship of an embassy to the Mongols is often forgotten. See Dawson, Christopher, The Mongol Mission (London and New York 1955).Google Scholar

⁸³ Several of the most important bulls are available in Davenport, F. G., European Treaties Bearing on the History of the United States and its Dependencies to 1815 (4 vols.; Washington, D.C. 1917–1919; reprinted Gloucester, Mass. 1967) I.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ Weckman, Luis, Las Bulas Alejandrinas de 1493 y la teoría política del papado medieval (Mexico City 1949). Weckman's bibliography, though extensive, does not include the works of Nys, Vanderpol, or Scott.Google Scholar

⁸⁵ de Witte, Charles-Martial, ‘Les bulles pontificales et l'expansion portugaise au XV^e siècle,’ Revue d'histoire ecclésiastique 48 (1953) 683–718; 49 (1954) 438–61; 51 (1956) 415–53, 809–36; 53 (1958) 5–46 and 443–71.Google Scholar