Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T07:21:48.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heard Utopia vs Utopian Hearing: Haas's in vain and Political Ambivalence in New Music

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2018

MAX SILVA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines Haas's politically programmatic work in vain in relation to a later essay wherein Haas disavows politically motivated composition. The first section investigates Haas's allegation that in vain’s ideological failure is due to its politically inappropriate semantic richness. Yet multiple interpretive passes through the piece show that in vain fails to be ideologically straightforward only because of a deeper ethical commitment to an aesthetics of defamiliarization. In the second section, I show how the basic political narrative is complicated by the estranging effect of darkness; in the third section, I align Haas's aesthetics with a post-Spectral ethics, and consider how the narrative meaning of overtone chords is complicated by their potential for challenging preconceived categories of listening. The final section returns to the essay and its blind spot for this deeper ethical aesthetics that obscures in vain’s ideological clarity, speculating that Haas's omission betrays hidden anxieties about the modernist ethical project.

Type
Articles
Information
Twentieth-Century Music , Volume 15 , Special Issue 1: Special Issue: Spectral Thinking , February 2018 , pp. 75 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodor. Minima Moralia, trans. Jephcott, E. F. N.. London and New York: Verso, 1978.Google Scholar
Brodsky, Seth. From 1989, or European Music and the Modernist Unconscious. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Brown, Jeffrey Arlo. ‘Decades: An Interview with Georg Friedrich Haas’, VAN Magazine 2, 2 February 2016. https://van-us.atavist.com/decades (accessed 12 April 2017).Google Scholar
Cramer, Alfred. ‘Schoenberg's Klangfarbenmelodie: A Principle of Early Atonal Harmony’. Music Theory Spectrum 24/1 (2002), 1–34.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Diana. ‘A Musical Paradox’. Music Perception 3 (1986), 275–80.Google Scholar
Farthofer, Lisa. Georg Friedrich Haas: ‘Im Klang denken’. Saarbrucken: PFAU-Verlag, 2007.Google Scholar
Ford, Mike. ‘Spectralism as Activism: Georg Friedrich Haas's Musical Response to the Death of Eric Garner’. Paper presented at the conference Spectralisms, Oxford (UK), March 2017.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Paul. Modern Music and After, 3rd edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Günther, Bernhard. ‘Zu in vain von Georg Friedrich Haas’, in Wien Modern: 27. Oktober bis 26. Novermber 2000 – Elektronik, Raum, ‘musique spectrale’ – Ein Festival mit Musik unserer Zeit. Saarbrücken: PFAU-Verlag, 2000. 111–13.Google Scholar
Haas, Georg Friedrich. ‘Mikrotonalitäten’, in Musik-Konzepte Sonderband: Musik der anderen Tradition: Mikrotonale Tonwelten, ed. Rudolf Zender, Hans, Metzger, Heinz-Klaus, and Riehn, Rainer. Munich: Edition Text + Kritik, 2003. 59–65.Google Scholar
Haas, Georg Friedrich. ‘Mikrotonalität und spektrale Musik seit 1980’, in Orientierungen: Wege im Pluralismus der Gegenwartsmusik, ed. Peter Hiekel, Jörn (Mainz: Schott Music International, 2007), 123–9.Google Scholar
Haas, Georg Friedrich. ‘Komponisten – Ideen und Wirklichkeitserfahrung’, Österreichische Musikzeitschrift, 63/8–9 (2008), 43–4.Google Scholar
Haas, Georg Friedrich. ‘On the Magic of “Pure” Intervals: An Interview with Heinz Rögl’. Universal Edition Musikblätter 5 (2013), 8–17. www.universaledition.com/tl_files/News_Dateien/Musikblaetter/musikblaetter-05-en.pdf (accessed 21 April, 2017).Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Robert. ‘Gegenstrebige Harmonik in the Music of Hans Zender’. Perspectives of New Music 49/1 (2011), 207–34.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Robert. ‘Clashing Harmonic Systems in Haas's Blumenstück and in vain’. Music Theory Spectrum 37/2 (2015), 204–23.Google Scholar
Hiekel, Jörn Pieter. ‘Dunkle Raume: Georg Friedrich Haas’. Positionen: Beitrage zur Neuen Musik 73 (November 2007), 21–3.Google Scholar
Hutchison, Mark. ‘Stairways in the Dark: Sound, Syntax and the Sublime in Haas's in vain’. Paper presented at the conference Spectralisms, Oxford (UK), March 2017.Google Scholar
Kane, Brian. ‘The Music of Skepticism: Intentionality, Materiality, Forms of Life’. PhD diss., UC Berkeley, 2006.Google Scholar
Lachenmann, Helmut. ‘Hearing is Defenseless – Without Listening: On Possibilities and Difficulties’, trans. Derrick Calandrella. Circuit: Musiques contemporaines 31/2 (2003/1985), 27–50.Google Scholar
Lachenmann, Helmut. ‘Art and Democracy’, in The Second Century of New Music, ed. Cox, Franklin, Péter Biró, Dániel, Sigman, Alexander, and Kazuo Takasugi, Steven. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 2011 (2008). 238–44.Google Scholar
Murail, Tristan. ‘Who Invented Spectral Music?’ Keynote lecture at the conference Spectralisms, Oxford (UK), March 2017.Google Scholar
Rings, Steven. Tonality and Transformation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Ross, Alex. ‘Darkness Audible’, New Yorker, 29 November 2010.Google Scholar
Varga, Balint András. Three Questions for Sixty-Five Composers. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Wilson, Charles. ‘György Ligeti and the Rhetoric of Autonomy’. Twentieth-Century Music 1/1 (2004), 5–28.Google Scholar
Woolfe, Zachary. ‘A Composer and his Wife, Creativity Through Kink’, The New York Times, 23 February 2016. www.nytimes.com/2016/02/24/arts/music/a-composer-and-his-wife-creativity-through-kink (accessed 20 April 2017).Google Scholar