Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-23T06:56:14.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The new urban history and its alternatives: some reflections on recent U.S. scholarship on the twentieth-century city

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2009

Raymond A. Mohl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Historians came late to the study of the American city. They lagged far behind scholars in other disciplines who, by the turn of the twentieth century, had begun to apply the tools of the social sciences to the examination of urban America and its problems. American urban history as a distinctive field of scholarly inquiry does not date much earlier than 1940, when Arthur M. Schlesinger, sr, published his landmark article on ‘The City in American History.’ Interest in the field grew rather slowly, however, and by the mid-1950s only a half-dozen or so universities offered courses in the subject. Progress in urban history research was also somewhat less than dynamic, the chief accomplishments being several fine urban biographies and a handful of monographs, notably the works of Carl Bridenbaugh on the colonial seaport towns, Oscar Handlin's study of Boston's immigrants, and Richard C. Wade's book, The Urban Frontier (1959).

Type
Research Article
Information
Urban History Yearbook , Volume 10 , May 1983 , pp. 19 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Schlesinger, A. M. Sr, ‘The city in American history,’ Mississippi Valley Historical Rev., XXVII (June 1940), 43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also Schlesinger, A. M., The Rise of the City, 1878–1898 (New York, 1933).Google Scholar For detailed study of American urban historiography, see Mohl, R. A., ‘The History of the American City,’ in The Reinterpretation of American History and Culture, Cartwright, W. H. and Watson, R. L. Jr (eds.), (Washington, D. C, 1973), 165–205;Google Scholar Stave, B. M., The Making of Urban History: Historiography Through Oral History (Beverly Hills, Calif., 1977);Google Scholar Ebner, M. H., ‘Urban history: retrospect and prospect’, J. American History, LXVIII (June 1981), 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 McKelvey, B., ‘American urban history today,’ American Historical Rev., LVII (July 1952), 919–29;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Bridenbaugh, C., Cities in the Wilderness (New York, 1938);Google Scholar Bridenbaugh, C., Cities in Revolt (New York, 1955);Google Scholar Handlin, O., Boston's Immigrants (Cambridge, Mass., 1941);Google Scholar Wade, R. C., The Urban Frontier: The Rise of Western Cities, 1790–1830 (Cambridge, Mass., 1959).Google Scholar For a model urban biography from this period, see Still, B., Milwaukee: The History of a City (Madison, Wise, 1948).Google Scholar

3 On these points, see Unger, I., ‘The “New Left” and American History: some recent trends in United States historiography‘, American Historical Rev., LXXII (July 1967), 1237–63;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Skotheim, R. A. (ed.), The Historian and the Climate of Opinion (Reading, Mass., 1969);Google Scholar Sternsher, B., Consensus, Conflict, and American Historians (Bloomington, Ind., 1975);Google Scholar Kammen, M. (ed.), ThePastBefore Us: Contemporary Historical Writing in the United States (Ithaca, N. Y., 1980).Google Scholar

4 Aydelotte, W. O., ‘Quantification in history,’ American Historical Rev, LXXI (April 1966), 803–25;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Clubb, J. M. and Allen, H. W., ‘Computers and historical studies’, J. American History, LIV (December 1967), 599–607;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Shorter, E., The Historian and the Computer (Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1971).Google Scholar On the monographic explosion since the 1960s, see Bailyn, B., ‘The challenge of modern historiography’, American Historical Rev., LXXXVII (February 1982), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Warner, S. B. Jr, Streetcar Suburbs: The Process of Growth in Boston, 1870–1900 (Cambridge, Mass., 1962).Google Scholar See also Warner's, other writings: ‘If all the world were Philadelphia: a scaffolding for urban history, 1774–1930’, American Historical Rev., LXXIV (October 1968), 26–43;CrossRefGoogle Scholar The Private City: Philadelphia in Three Periods of Its Growth (Philadelphia, 1968);Google Scholar The Urban Wilderness: A History of the American City (New York, 1972);Google Scholar and The Way We Really Live: Social Change in Boston Since 1920 (Boston, 1977).Google Scholar See n. 8 below for Thernstrom.

6 Lampard, E., ‘American historians and the study of urbanization,’ American Historical Rev., LXVII (October 1961), 49–61;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Lampard, E., ‘Urbanization and social change: on broadening the scope and relevance of urban history,’ in The Historian and the City, Handlin, O. and Burchard, J. (eds.), (Cambridge, Mass., 1963), 225–47;Google Scholar Lampard, E., ‘Historical aspects of urbanization’, in The Study of Urbanization, Hauser, P. M. and Schnore, L. F. (eds.), (New York, 1965), 519–54;Google Scholar Lampard, E., ‘The dimensions of urban history: a footnote of the “urban crisis,”’ Pacific Historical Rev., XXXIX (August 1970), 261–78;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Stave, B. M., ‘A conversation with Eric E. Lampard’, J. Urban History, I (August 1975), 440–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Lubove, R., ‘The urbanization process: an approach to historical research’, J. American Institute of Planners, XXXIII (January 1967), 33–9;Google Scholar Lubove, R., Twentieth-Century Pittsburg: Government, Business and Environmental Change (New York, 1969).Google Scholar

8 Thernstrom, S., Poverty and Progress: Social Mobility in aNineteenth Century City (Cambridge, Mass., 1964);Google Scholar Thernstrom, S. and Sennett, Richard (eds.), Nineteenth-Century Cities: Essays in the New Urban History (New Haven, Conn., 1969);Google Scholar Schnore, L. F. (ed.), The New Urban History: Quantitative Explorations by American Historians (Princeton, 1975).Google Scholar

9 Thernstrom, S., ‘Reflections on the new urban history’, Daedalus, c (Spring 1971), 359–75.Google Scholar

10 Frisch, M., ‘American urban history as an example of recent historiography’, History and Theory, XVIII (1979), 350–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Thernstrom, S., The Other Bostonians: Poverty and Progress in the A merican Metropolis, 1880–1970 (Cambridge, Mass., 1973);CrossRefGoogle Scholar Stave, B. M., ‘A conversation with Stephen Thernstrom,’ J. Urban History, I (February 1975), 189–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Sharpless, J. B. and Warner, S. B. Jr, ‘Urban history’, American Behavioral Scientist, XXI (November-December 1977), 221–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also Stave, B. M., ‘A conversation with Sam Bass Warner jr’, J. Urban History, I (November 1974), 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Hershberg, T., ‘The new urban history: toward an interdisciplinary history of the city’, J. Urban History, V (November 1979), 3–40;Google Scholar Hershberg, T. (ed.), Philadelphia: Work, Space, Family and Group Experience in the Nineteenth-Century (New York, 1981), 3–35.Google Scholar

14 ‘Toward an interdisciplinary history of the American city’, J. Urban History, VIII (August 1982).Google Scholar See also Simon, R. D., ‘Process in urban history: substance and method’, Revs, in American History, IX (December 1981), 439–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 Gelfand, M., A Nation of Cities: The Federal Government and Urban America, 1933–1965 (New York, 1975);Google Scholar Funigiello, P., The Challenge to Urban Liberalism: Federal-City Relations during World War II (Knoxville, 1978).Google Scholar

16 Phillpott, T. L., The Slum and the Ghetto: Neighborhood Deterioration and Middle-Class Reform, Chicago, 1880–1930 (New York, 1978);Google Scholar Bowly, D. Jr, The Poorhouse: Subsidized Housing in Chicago, 1895–1976 (Carbondale, Ill., 1978);Google Scholar Wright, G., Building the Dream: A SocialHistory of Housing in America (New York, 1981);Google Scholar Arnold, J. L., The New Deal in the Suburbs: A History of the Greenbelt Town Program, 1935–1954 (Columbus, Ohio, 1971).Google Scholar

17 Miller, Z. L., Suburb: Neighborhood and Community in Forest Park, Ohio, 1935–1976 (Knoxville, 1981).Google Scholar See also Steiner, F., The Politics of New Town Planning: The Newfields, Ohio, Story (Athens, Ohio, 1981);Google Scholar Corden, C., Planned Cities: New Towns in Britain and America (Beverly Hills, Calif., 1977).Google Scholar

18 Trout, C. H., Boston, the Great Depression and the New Deal (New York, 1977);Google Scholar Dorsett, L. W., Franklin D. Roosevelt and the City Bosses (Port Washington, N. Y., 1977).Google Scholar See also Allswang, J. M., Bosses, Machines, and Urban Voters (Port Washington, N.Y., 1977).Google Scholar

19 Teaford, J. C., City and Suburb: The Political Fragmentation of Metropolitan America, 1850–1970 (Baltimore, 1979).Google Scholar

20 Fox, K., Better City Government: Innovation in American Urban Politics, 1850–1937 (Philadelphia, 1977).Google Scholar See also Rice, B. R., Progressive Cities: The Commission Government Movement in America, 1901–1920 (Austin, 1977);Google Scholar Schiesl, M. J., The Politics of Efficiency: Municipal Administration and Reform in America, 1880–1920 (Berkeley, 1977);Google Scholar Ebner, M. H. and Tobin, E. M. (eds.), The Age of Urban Reform: New Perspectives on the Progressive Era (Port Washington, N.Y., 1977).Google Scholar

21 Katznelson, I., City Trenches: Urban Politics and the Patterning of Class in the United States (New York, 1981).Google Scholar

22 Foster, M. S., From Streetcar to Superhighway: American City Planners and Urban Transportation, 1900–1940 (Philadelphia, 1981).Google Scholar For the conspiracy theory, see Snell, B. C., American Ground Transport (Washington, D.C., 1974);Google Scholar Taebel, D. A. and Cornehls, J. V., The Political Economy of Urban Transportation (Port Washington, N.Y., 1977).Google Scholar For a somewhat different approach to highway history, see Rose, M. H., Interstate: Express Highway Politics, 1941–1956 (Lawrence, Kan., 1979)Google Scholar, and Brodsly, D., L. A. Freeway (Berkeley, 1981).Google Scholar For an excellent study of urban mass transit, see Cheape, C. W., Moving the Masses: Urban Public Transit in New York, Boston, and Philadelphia, 1880–1912 (Cambridge, Mass., 1980).Google Scholar

23 Goldberger, P., The Skyscraper (New York, 1981).Google Scholar For a different perspective on American architecture, see Wolfe, T., From Bauhaus to Our House (New York, 1981).Google Scholar

24 Melosi, M. V. (ed.), Pollution and Reform in American Cities, 1870–1930 (Austin, 1980);Google Scholar Melosi, M. V., Garbage in the Cities: Refuse, Reform, and the Environment, 1880–1980 (College Station, Tex., 1981).Google Scholar

25 Leavitt, J. W., The Healthiest City: Milwaukee and the Politics of Health Reform (Princeton, 1982).Google Scholar

26 Meier, A. and Rudwick, E., Black Detroit and the Rise of the UAW (New York, 1979);Google Scholar Borchert, J., Alley Life in Washington: Family, Community, Religion, and Folklife in the City, 1850–1970 (Urbana, Ill., 1980).Google Scholar

27 Bayor, R. H., Neighbors in Conflict: The Irish, Germans, Jews, and Italians of New York City, 1929–1941 (Baltimore, 1978);Google Scholar Moore, D. D., At Home in America: Second Generation New York Jews (New York, 1981);Google Scholar Gurock, J. S., When Harlem Was Jewish (New York, 1979);Google Scholar Kwong, P., Chinatown, New York: Labor and Politics, 1930–1950 (New York, 1979);Google Scholar Jones, P. and Holli, M. G. (eds.), Ethnic Chicago (Grand Rapids, Mich., 1981);Google Scholar Bodnar, J., Simon, R., and Weber, M. P., Lives Of Their Own: Blacks, Italians, and Poles in Pittsburgh, 1900–1960 (Urbana, Ill., 1982);Google Scholar Stack, J. F. Jr, International Conflict in an American City: Boston's Irish, Italians, and Jews, 1935–1944 (Westport, Con., 1979);Google Scholar Golab, C., Immigrant Destinations (Philadelphia, 1977).Google Scholar

28 Abbott, C., The New Urban America: Growth andPolitics in Sunbelt Cities (Chapel Hill, N. C, 1981).Google Scholar For an earlier but less successful analysis of the sunbelt phenomenon, see Perry, D. C. and Watkins, A. J. (eds.), The Rise of the Sunbelt Cities (Beverly Hills, Calif., 1977).Google Scholar

29 Mohl, R. A., ‘Miami: The Ethnic Cauldron’, in Sunbelt Cities: Politics and Growth Since World War II, Bernard, R. M. and Rice, B. R. (eds.) (Austin, 1982).Google Scholar

30 Berry, B. J. L., The Human Consequence of Urbanization: Divergent paths in the Urban experience of the twentieth century (New York, 1973);CrossRefGoogle Scholar revised as Comparative Urbanisation: Divergent Paths in the Twenthieth Century (New York, 1981).Google Scholar