Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T06:34:43.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adsorption of Imazaquin and Imazethapyr on Soils, Sediments, and Selected Adsorbents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Mark M. Loux
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Rex A. Liebl
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Fred W. Slife
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801

Abstract

Adsorption of imazaquin and imazethapyr on soils, sediments, clays, and ion exchange resins was studied. Multivariate regression analysis of Freundlich K values and soil and sediment properties yielded a model for imazaquin adsorption which included soil pH, organic carbon, and clay as significant independent variables. Clay content and pH were significant independent variables for the imazethapyr adsorption model. Adsorption of imazaquin and imazethapyr was greater at pH below 6 than at a higher pH. Adsorption of both herbicides on Ca- and H/Al-kaolinite and Ca-montmorillonite was low, but increased on H/Al-montmorillonite. The results of adsorption studies with ion exchange resins indicated that binding of protonated herbicide at low pH could be due to physical forces, hydrogen bonding, or cationic binding. At soil pH levels above the pKa's of imazaquin and imazethapyr, ionic bonding of herbicide anions with positively charged soil components could also occur.

Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Allison, L. E. 1965. Organic Carbon. Pages 13671396 in Black, C. A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis. Agron. Ser. #9: Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
2. American Cyanamid Co. 1986. Technical Information Report on Imazaquin. Agric. Div., Wayne, NJ 07470.Google Scholar
3. American Cyanamid Co. 1987. Technical Information Report an Imazethapyr. Agric. Res. Div., Princeton, NJ 08540.Google Scholar
4. Basham, G., Lavy, T. L., Oliver, L. R., and Scott, H. D. 1987. Imazaquin persistence and mobility in three Arkansas soils. Weed Sci. 35:576582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Chapman, H. D. 1965. Cation exchange capacity. Pages 891901 in Black, C. A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis. Agron. Ser. #9: Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
6. Day, P. R. 1965. Particle fractionation and particle size analysis. Pages 545567 in Black, C. A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis. Agron. Ser. #9: Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
7. Donaldson, T. W. and Foy, C. 1965. The phytotoxicity and persistence in soils of benzoic acid herbicides. Weed Sci. 13:195202.Google Scholar
8. Goetz, A. J., Wehjte, G., Walker, R. H., and Hajek, B. 1986. Soil solution and mobility characterization of imazaquin. Weed Sci. 34:788793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Green, R. E. 1974. Pesticide-clay-water interactions. Pages 337 in Guenzi, W. D., ed. Pesticides in Soil and Water. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
10. Grover, R. 1971. Adsorption of picloram by soil colloids and various other adsorbents. Weed Sci. 19:417418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Hamaker, J. W. and Thompson, J. M. 1972. Adsorption. Pages 49143 in Goring, C. A. and Hamaker, J. W., eds. Organic Chemicals in the Soil Environment. Marcel-Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
12. Harward, M. E. and Coleman, N. T. 1954. Some properties of H- and Al-clays and exchange resins. Soil Sci. 78:181188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Availability and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in soil. Weed Sci. 37:259267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Mersie, W. and Foy, C. L. 1985. Phytotoxicity and adsorption of chlorsulfuron as affected by soil properties. Weed Sci. 33:564568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1986. Effect of soil pH on imazaquin and imazethapyr adsorption to soil and phytotoxicity to corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 36:7883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Rick, S. K., Slife, F. W., and Banwart, W. L. 1987. Adsorption of selective grass herbicides by soils and sediments. Weed Sci. 35:282288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Shea, P. J. 1986. Chlorsulfuron dissociation and adsorption on selected adsorbents and soils. Weed Sci. 34:474478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Stevenson, F. J. 1982. Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 443 pp.Google Scholar
19. Stougaard, R. N., Shea, P. J., and Martin, A. R. 1985. The effect of soil type and pH on AC-263,499 and imazaquin. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 40:15.Google Scholar
20. Theisen, A. and Harward, M. E. 1962. A paste method for preparation of slides for clay mineral identification by x-ray diffraction. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 26:9091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Thirunarayanan, K., Zimdahl, R. L., and Smika, D. E. 1985. Chlorsulfuron adsorption and degradation in soil. Weed Sci. 33:558563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Upchurch, R. P. and Mason, D. D. 1962. The influence of soil organic matter on the phytotoxicity of herbicides. Weed Sci. 10:915.Google Scholar
23. Weber, J. B. and Weed, S. B. 1974. Effects of soil on the biological activity of pesticides. Pages 223256 in Guenzi, W. D., ed. Pesticides in Soil and Water. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
24. Weed, S. B. and Weber, J. B. 1974. Pesticide-organic matter interactions. Pages 3966 in Guenzi, W. D., ed. Pesticides in Soil and Water. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, WI.Google Scholar