Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T01:42:10.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Establishment of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) in corn, soybean, and wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Joseph P. Yenish ,
Thomas A. Fry ,
Beverly R. Durgan  and
Donald L. Wyse
Thomas A. Fry
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Beverly R. Durgan
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Donald L. Wyse
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The establishment of common milkweed in corn, soybean, and wheat and rotations of corn-soybean and soybean-wheat was determined in field studies at Rosemount and Morris, MN. Common milkweed seedling density 115 d after initial seedling emergence was 500, 15,000, and 31,300 seedlings ha−1 in corn, soybean, and wheat, respectively, in 1990; 500, 7,300, and 15,600 in 1991 at Rosemount and 2,900, 26,500, and 37,000 in 1990; and 2,200, 6,700, and 8,100 in 1991 at Morris in the year of seedling establishment. Common milkweed seedling defoliation by mon arch butterfly larva was 1,31, and 0% at Rosemount and 20, 78, and 0% at Morris for corn, soybean, and wheat, respectively. In the 2nd and 3rd rotational years, corn-soybean rotations had fewer shoots ha−1 115 d after shoot emergence than soybean wheat rotations. Seedling densities 115 d after initial seedling emergence were greater in corn-soybean rotations where soybean rather than corn was the rotational crop and in soybean-wheat rotations where wheat rather than soybean was the rotational crop immediately following common milkweed seeding. Conventional tillage treatments had lower common milkweed shoot density than conservation tillage in all years of all rotations except in the initial count, when soybean was the first rotational crop in which shoot density was greater in conventional than in conservation tillage treatments. Cyanazine, imazethapyr, or bromoxynil applications in corn, soybean, or wheat rotational crops, respectively, reduced common milkweed shoot density.

Keywords

Conservation tillageperennial weedsmonarch butterfly (Danaus spp.)ASCSYBromoxynil, 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrilecyanazine, 2-[[4-chloro-6-(ethylamino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-2-methylpropanenitrileimazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidcommon milkweed, Asclepias syriaca L. ASCSYcorn, Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3772’soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Glenwood’hard red spring wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Marshall’
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , February 1997 , pp. 44 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bhowmik, P. C. and Bandeen, J. D. 1976. The biology of Canadian weeds. Asclepias syriaca L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56: 579–589.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. 1992. Population dynamics and control of annual weeds in corn (Zea mays) as influenced by tillage. Weed Sci. 40: 241–248.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Daniel, T. C. 1988. Influence of tillage systems on giant foxtail, Seteria faberii, and velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti, density and control in corn, Zea mays . Weed Sci. 36: 642–647.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D., Stoltenberg, D. E., Becker, R. L., and Gunsolus, J. L. 1994. Perennial weed populations after 14 years of variable tillage and cropping practices. Weed Sci. 42: 205–209.Google Scholar
Cramer, G. L. and Burnside, O. C. 1982. Distribution and interference of common milkweed in Nebraska. Weed Sci. 30: 385–388.Google Scholar
Durgan, B. R. and Wyse, D. L. 1988. Common milkweed interference in spring wheat. Proc. North Central Weed Control Conf. 42: 15.Google Scholar
Evetts, L. L. and Burnside, O. C. 1972. Germination and seedling development of common milkweed and other species. Weed Sci. 20: 371–378.Google Scholar
Evetts, L. L. and Burnside, O. C. 1974. Root distribution and vegetative propagation of Asclepias syriaca L. Weed Res. 14: 283–288.Google Scholar
Evetts, L. L. and Burnside, O. C. 1975. Effect of early competition on growth of common milkweed. Weed Sci. 23: 1–3.Google Scholar
Matlack, G. R. 1987. Diaspore size, shape and fall behavior in wind-dispersed plant species. Am. J. Bot. 74: 1150–1160.Google Scholar
Morse, D. H. and Schmitt, J. 1985. Propagule size, dispersal ability, and seedling performance in Asclepias syriaca . Oceologia 67: 372–379.Google Scholar
Putnam, A. R. and Rice, R. P. Jr. 1979. Environmental and edaphic influences on the selectivity of alachlor on snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Sci. 28: 570–574.Google Scholar
Sroller, E. W., Harrison, S. K., Wax, L. M., Regnier, E. E., and Nafziger, E. D. 1987. Weed interference in soybean (Glycine max). Rev. Weed Sci. 3: 155–181.Google Scholar
Triplet, G. B. Jr. 1985. Principles of weed control for reduced-tillage corn production. in Weise, A. F., ed. Weed Control in Limited Tillage Systems. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society Monograph 2, pp. 26–40.Google Scholar
Urquhart, F. A. and Urquhart, N. R. 1978. Autumnal migration routes of the eastern population of the monarch butterfly (Danaus p. plexippus L. Danaidae; Lepidoptera) in North America to the overwintering site in the Neovolcanic Plateau of Mexico. Can. J. Zool. 56: 1759–1764.Google Scholar
Valachovic, M. 1991. Reproductive biology of Asclepias syriaca populations in Zahorsk Nizina lowland. Part II. Note on viability of seeds germination and seedling development. Biologia 46: 399–404.Google Scholar
Wilbur, H. M. 1976. Life history evolution in seven milkweed of the genus Asclepias . J. Ecol. 64: 223–240.Google Scholar
Wrucke, M. A. and Arnold, W. E. 1985. Weed species distribution as influenced by tillage and herbicides. Weed Sci. 33: 853–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yenish, J. P., Fry, T. A., Durgan, B. R., and Wyse, D. L. 1996. Tillage effects on seed distribution and common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) establishment. Weed Sci. In press.Google Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L. 1980. Weed Crop Competition: A Review. Corvallis, OR: International Plant Protection Center. 196 p.Google Scholar