Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T12:15:46.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identification of graminicide-resistant johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Charles E. Snipes
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, MAFES Delta Branch Experiment Station, Stoneville, MS 38776
William L. Barrentine
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, MAFES Delta Branch Experiment Station, Stoneville, MS 38776

Abstract

Resistance to fluazifop-P and quizalofop-P, (aryloxyphenoxypropionates) and sethoxydim (cyclohexanedione) was identified in 2 populations of johnsongrass in both field and greenhouse studies. The cropping history (1983–1991) of the sites indicated 1 or more annual applications of a graminicide (primarily fluazifop-P) since the early 1980s. Under field conditions, control of resistant seedling and rhizome johnsongrass (R91F) with fluazifop-P, quizalofop-P, fenoxaprop-ethyl, and sethoxydim was less than 35%. Clethodim provided up to 80% control of R91F. Under greenhouse conditions, ratios (R/S) of the I50 values (amount of herbicide required to inhibit plant growth by 50%) of resistant (2 sites: R91F and R91S) to susceptible (S91H) seedling (20–30-cm height) plants were > 388 (fluazifop-P), > 15 (quizalofop-P), and from 2.3 (R91S) to 3.4 (R91F) (both sethoxydim). For rhizome (30–45 cm height) plants, the R/S ratios were > 388 (fluazifop-P), > 16 (quizalofop-P), and 2.8 (R91S) to 8.5 (R91F) (both sethoxydim). Labeled rates (in kg ai ha−1) of fluazifop-P (0.10 and 0.21), quizalofop-P (0.039 and 0.08), and sethoxydim (0.21 and 0.21) were applied on seedling and rhizome plants, respectively, and resulted in little or no control of resistant johnsongrass. Greenhouse studies indicated registered rates of clethodim (0.10 and 0.14 kg ai ha−1 for seedling and rhizome plants, respectively) effectively controlled the resistant populations, but tolerance was measured for both seedling and rhizome plants at sublethal doses (down to 0.007 and 0.009 kg ai ha−1, respectively), with I50 ratios ranging from 1.5 (R91S) to 2.1 (R91F) for seedling plants and 4.5 (R91S) to 4.8 (R91F) for rhizome plants. Control of resistant seedling and rhizome johnsongrass under field conditions was adequate with glyphosate at 0.84, glufosinate at 0.84, and sulfosate at 0.84 kg ai ha−1, indicating no cross-resistance.

Type
Weed Management
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Barr, A. R., Mansooji, A. M., Holtum, J.A.M., and Powles, S. B. 1992. The inheritance of herbicide resistance in Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana, biotype SAS 1. In Proceedings of the First International Weed Control Congress. Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne Weed Science Sociery of Victoria, pp. 7075.Google Scholar
Barrentine, W. L., and Smeda, R. J. 1996. Alternatives for the control of ACC-ase resistant johnsongrass. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 49.Google Scholar
Barrentine, W. L., Snipes, C. E., and Smeda, R. J. 1992. Herbicide resistance confirmed in johnsongrass biotypes. MAFES Research Report 17(5). 5 p.Google Scholar
Betts, K. J., Ehlke, N. J., Wyse, D. L., Gronwald, J. W., and Somers, D. A. 1992. Mechanism of inheritance of diclofop resistance in Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Weed Sci. 40: 184189.Google Scholar
Devine, M. D. and Shimabukuro, R. H. 1994. Resistance to acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase inhibiting herbicides. in Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J.A.M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, pp. 141170.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M. and Knight, R. 1990. Variation in cross-resistance among populations of annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) resistant to diclofop-methyl. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 41: 121128.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M., Murray, B. G., Loeppky, H. A., and Morrison, I. N. 1993. Resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides in wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 41: 232238.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Pancho, J. V., Herberger, J. P., and Plucknett, D. L. 1991. A Geographical Atlas of World Weeds. Malabar, FL: Krieger, 346 p.Google Scholar
Mansooji, A. M., Holtum, J. A., Boutsalis, P., Matthews, J. M., and Powles, S. B. 1992. Resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides in two wild oat species (Avena fatua and Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana). Weed Sci. 40: 599605.Google Scholar
Marles, M.A.S., Devine, M. D., and Hall, J. C. 1993. Herbicide resistance in green foxtail (Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv.) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.) biotypes conferred by an insensitive form of acetyl coenzyme-A carboxylase. Proc. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. 33: 62.Google Scholar
Marshall, G., Kirkwood, R. C., and Leach, G. E. 1994. Comparative studies on graminicide-resistant and susceptible biotypes of Eleusine indica . Weed Res. 34: 177185.Google Scholar
Maxwell, B. D. and Mortimer, A. M. 1994. Selection for herbicide resistance. in Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J.A.M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, pp. 125.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. 1989. History, biology, and control of johnsongrass. Rev. Weed Sci. 4: 85121.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. 1993. A 16-yr survey on levels of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. Weed Sci. 41: 669677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, B. G., Morrison, I. N., and Brule-Babel, A. L. 1995. Inheritance of acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitor resistance in wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 43: 233238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiederholt, R. J. and Stoltenberg, D. E. 1995. Cross-resistance of a large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) accession to aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides. Weed Tech. 9: 518524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiederholt, R. J. and Stoltenberg, D. E. 1996. Absence of differential fitness between giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) accessions resistant and susceptible to acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitors. Weed Sci. 44: 1824.Google Scholar