Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T04:46:38.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Semidominant Nature of Monogenic Sulfonylurea Herbicide Resistance in Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Stephen E. Hart ,
Joseph W. Saunders  and
Donald Penner
Stephen E. Hart
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
Joseph W. Saunders
Affiliation:
USDA Agric. Res. Serv., East Lansing, MI 48824
Donald Penner
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse and laboratory studies were conducted to determine the degree of dominance of the monogenic sulfonylurea herbicide resistance trait in diploid sugarbeet by comparing the response of homozygous and heterozygous resistant sugarbeet to primisulfuron, thifensulfuron, and chlorimuron on the whole plant and acetolactate synthase (ALS) enzyme level. Progeny tests suggested that the monogenic sulfonylurea herbicide resistance was semidominant. Subsequently, heterozygous resistant (R-1) and homozygous resistant (R-2) sugarbeet lines were sprayed with increasing rates of primisulfuron, thifensulfuron, and chlorimuron, and herbicide rates required for 50% growth reduction (GR50) were determined. GR50 values were also determined for homozygous susceptible sugarbeet lines (S-1 and S-2). The GR50 values indicated that the R-2 sugarbeet was 377, 269, and 144 times more resistant to primisulfuron, thifensulfuron, and chlorimuron, respectively, than susceptible S-2 sugarbeet. In contrast, R-1 sugarbeet was only 107, 76, and 57 times more resistant to primisulfuron, thifensulfuron, and chlorimuron, respectively, than S-1 sugarbeet, indicating at least a twofold difference in the magnitude of resistance between homozygous resistant and heterozygous resistant sugarbeet lines. ALS enzyme activity analysis were consistent with whole plant results. Thus, based on these two, maximum crop resistance can be obtained by developing homozygous resistant cultivars.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)-amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidprimisulfuron, (2-[[[[[4,6-bis(difluoromethoxy)-2-pyrimidinyl]-amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidthifensulfuron 3-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl) amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-2-thiophenecarboxylic acidsugarbeet, Beta vulgaris L. ‘CR1-B’, ‘REL-1’Chlorimuronprimisulfuronthifensulfuronacetolactate synthase
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 317 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Carlson, K. L. and Weis, M. F. 1990. Weed control with imazethapyr in imidazolinone tolerant corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:33.Google Scholar
2. Chaleff, R. S. and Ray, T. B. 1984. Herbicide resistant mutants from tobacco ceil cultures. Science 223:1148–1151.Google Scholar
3. Falco, S. C. and Dumas, K. S. 1985. Genetic analysis of mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae resistant to the herbicide sulfometuronmethyl. Genetics 109:21–35.Google Scholar
4. Gabard, J. M., Charest, P. J., Iyer, V. N., and Miki, B. L. 1989. Cross-resistance to short residual sulfonylurea herbicides in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Physiol. 91:574–580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Hart, S. E., Saunders, J. W., and Penner, D. 1992. Chlorsulfuron resistant sugarbeet: cross-resistance and physiological basis of resistance. Weed Sci. 40:378–383.Google Scholar
6. Hartnett, M. E., Newcomb, J. R., and Hodson, R. C. 1987. Mutations in Chlamydomonos reinhardtii conferring resistance to the herbicide sulfometuron methyl. Plant Physiol. 85:898–901.Google Scholar
7. Haughn, G. W. and Sommerville, C. 1986. Sulfonylurea-resistant mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana . Mol. Gen. Genet. 204:430–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Haughn, G. W., Smith, J., Mazur, B., and Sommerville, C. Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthases gene renders tobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides. Mol. Gen. Genet. 211:266–271.Google Scholar
9. Jordan, M. C. and McHughen, A. 1987. Selection for chlorsulfuron resistance in flax (Linum usitatissimum) cell cultures. Plant Physiol. 131:333–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Lacrossa, R. A., VanDyk, T. K., and Smulski, D. R. 1987. Toxic accumulation of alpha-ketobutyrate caused by inhibition of the branched-chain amino acid biosynthetic enzyme acetolactate synthase in Salmonella typhimurium . J. Bacteriol. 169:1372–1378.Google Scholar
11. Levitt, G., Ploeg, H. L., Weigel, R. C., and Fitzgerald, D. J. 1981. 2-chloro-N-[4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-2-yl]amino carbonyl benzenesulfonamide, a new herbicide. J. Agric. Food Chem. 29:416–424.Google Scholar
12. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. S., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. S. 1951. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193:265–275.Google Scholar
13. Mallory-Smith, C. A., Thill, D. C., Thill, M. J., and Zemetra, R. S. 1990. Inheritance of sulfonylurea herbicide resistance in Lactuca spp. Weed Technol. 4:787–790.Google Scholar
14. Newhouse, K. E., Wang, T., and Anderson, P. C. 1991. ‘Imidazolinone Resistant Crops’. Pages 139–150 in Shaner, D. L. and Conner, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google ScholarPubMed
15. Ray, T. B. 1984. Site of action of chlorsulfuron: Inhibition of valine and isoleucine biosynthesis in plants. Plant Physiol. 75:827–831.Google Scholar
16. Roeth, F. and Martin, A. 1990. Shattercane control and corn cultivar response to imazethapyr. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:28.Google Scholar
17. Saari, L. L., Cotterman, S. C., and Primiani, M. M. 1990. Mechanism of sulfonylurea resistance in the broadleaf weed, Kochia scoparia . Plant Physiol. 93:55–61.Google Scholar
18. Saunders, J. W., Acquaah, G., Renner, K. A., Penner, D., and Doley, W. P. 1989. Cell selection for sulfonylurea resistance in sugarbeet. Abstr., Am. Soc. Agron. Page 179.Google Scholar
19. Sebastian, S. A., Fader, G. M., Ulrich, J. F., Forney, D. R., and Chaleff, R. S. 1989. Semidominant soybean mutation for resistance to sulfonylurea herbicides. Crop Sci. 29:1403–1408.Google Scholar
20. Shaner, D. L., Anderson, P. C., and Stidham, M. A. 1984. Imadazolinones, potent inhibitors of acetohydroxy acid synthase. Plant Physiol. 76:545–546.Google Scholar
21. Smith, G. A. 1987. ‘Sugarbeet’. Pages 577–625 in Fehr, W. R., ed. Principles of Cultivar Development. The MacMillan Co., New York.Google Scholar
22. Westerfield, W. W. 1945. A colorimetric determination of blood acetoin. J. Biol. Chem. 161:495–502.Google Scholar