Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T09:16:23.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Translocation of Glyphosate, Quizalofop, and Sucrose in Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) Biotypes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

François J. Tardif
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Laval Univ., Cité Universitaire, Qc, Canada G1K 7P4
Gilles D. Leroux
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Laval Univ., Cité Universitaire, Qc, Canada G1K 7P4

Abstract

The translocation pattern and distribution in rhizomes of 14C-glyphosate, 14C-quizalofop, and 14C-sucrose was examined in five quackgrass biotypes. Translocation of radioactivity in the different plant parts varied among biotypes. Translocation in the whole plant after treatment with the three 14C-chemicals varied among biotypes but was not correlated with their tolerance to herbicides. Detailed analysis of distribution of radioactivity in the primary rhizome showed that more 14C was found in the apical sections after treatment with 14C-sucrose. A similar pattern was observed after 14C-glyphosate application with all biotypes except one. Very low radioactivity was found in rhizomes after 14C-quizalofop application, but a preferential accumulation in apical sections of the primary rhizome was detected in two biotypes. The tolerance of one biotype to glyphosate was explained by the absence of radioactivity accumulation in the apical sections of the rhizome.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alcantara, E. N., Wyse, D. L., and Spitzmueller, J. M. 1989. Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) biotypes response to sethoxydim and haloxyfop. Weed Sci. 37:107111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Allen, O. B. 1983. A guide to the analysis of growth curve data with special reference to SAS. Computers Biomed. Res. 16:101115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Claus, J. S., and Behrens, R. 1976. Glyphosate translocation and quackgrass rhizome bud kill. Weed Sci. 24:149152.Google Scholar
4. Devine, M. D. 1989. Phloem translocation of herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:191213.Google Scholar
5. Duke, S. O. 1988. Glyphosate. Pages 170 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides. Vol 3. Chemistry. Degradation and Mode of Action. Marcel-Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
6. Duke, S. O. and Kenyon, W. H. 1988. Polycyclic Alkanoic Acids. Pages 71116 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides. Vol 3. Chemistry, Degradation and Mode of Action. Marcel-Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
7. Gougler, J. A. and Geiger, D. R. 1984. Carbon partitioning and herbicide transport in glyphosate-treated sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci. 32:546551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Harker, K. N. and Dekker, J. 1988. Effects of phenology on translocation patterns of several herbicides within quackgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci. 36:463472.Google Scholar
9. Harker, K. N. and Dekker, J. 1988. Temperature effects on translocation patterns of several herbicides within quackgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci. 36:545552.Google Scholar
10. Hicks, C. P. and Jordan, T. N. 1984. Response of bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), quackgrass (Agropyron repens), and wire-stem muhly (Muhlenbergia frondosa) to postemergence grass herbicides. Weed Sci. 32:835841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds. Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar
12. Koeppe, M. K., Anderson, J. J., and Shalaby, L. M. 1990. Metabolism of [14C]quizalofop-ethyl in soybean and cotton plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 38:10851091.Google Scholar
13. Komosza, D., Gennity, I., and Sandermann, H. Jr. 1992. Plant metabolism of herbicides with C-P bonds: glyphosate. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 43:8594.Google Scholar
14. McIntyre, G. I. and Hsiao, A. I. 1982. Influence of nitrogen and humidity on rhizome bud growth and glyphosate translocation in quackgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci. 30:655660.Google Scholar
15. Rioux, R., Bandeen, J. D., and Anderson, G. W. 1974. Effects of growth stage on translocation of glyphosate in quackgrass. Can. J. Plant Sci. 54:397401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Sampson, M. G. 1987. Quackgrass biotypes. In Techn. Proc. Quackgrass Action Committee Workshop, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.Google Scholar
17. Tardif, F. J. and Leroux, G. D. 1990. Rhizome bud viability of quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) treated with glyphosate and quizalofop. Weed Technol. 4:529533.Google Scholar
18. Tardif, F. J. and Leroux, G. D. 1991. Response of quackgrass biotypes to glyphosate and quizalofop. Can. J. Plant Sci. 71:803810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Tardif, F. J. and Leroux, G. D. 1991. Variability of quackgrass biotypes in Québec. Phytoprotection 72:115121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Trimmer, M. C. and Linscott, D. L. 1988. Water relations in quackgrass (Agropyron repens) following postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 36:273278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Werner, P. A. and Rioux, R. 1977. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 23. Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57:905919.Google Scholar
22. Westra, P. 1980. Control of quackgrass (Agropyron repens) biotypes with glyphosate. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Minnesota.Google Scholar
23. Wilhm, J. L., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1986. Effect of acifluorfen and bentazon on absorption and translocation of haloxyfop and DPX-Y6202 in quackgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci. 34:333337.Google Scholar