Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T20:11:23.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) Recruitment, Survival, Seed Production, and Interference in Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John L. Lindquist ,
Bruce D. Maxwell ,
Douglas D. Buhler  and
Jeffrey L. Gunsolus
John L. Lindquist
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Plant Gen., Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Bruce D. Maxwell
Affiliation:
Plant, Soil and Environ. Sci. Dep., Montana State Univ., Bozeman, MT 59717
Douglas D. Buhler
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric, Agr. Res. Serv., National Soil Tilth Lab., Ames, IA, 50011
Jeffrey L. Gunsolus
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Plant Gen., Univ. Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted at Rosemount, MN, in 1992 and 1993 to quantify the demographic processes regulating the population dynamics of velvetleaf in soybean as part of a corn-soybean rotation. A consistent 6.8 ± 0.5% of the total velvetleaf seedbank emerged each year. Less than 21% of all velvetleaf seedlings survived each year in mixture with soybean, due in part to Verticillium spp wilt infection. The probability of seedling survival varied across time of emergence. Velvetleaf seed production in the absence of crop competition was 125 and 227 seeds plant−1 in 1992 and 1993, respectively. Velvetleaf plants that emerged early produced greater numbers of seed than later emerging plants. Velvetleaf survival and seed production were reduced up to 82% in the presence of crop competition. Soybean yield varied across soybean densities in both years, but was not reduced across velvetleaf densities.

Keywords

Velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medicus. #3 ABUTHsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Evans’corn, Zea mays LWeed demographyemergenceweed seedling mortalitymodelingVerticilliumABUTH
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , June 1995 , pp. 226 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

1. Abernathy, J. R. 1992. Winds of change. Weed Technol. 6:760–764.Google Scholar
2. Alm, D. M., Stoller, E. W., and Wax, L. M. 1993. An index model for predicting seed germination and emergence rates. Weed Technol. 7:560–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Bauer, T. A. and Mortensen, D. A. 1992. A comparison of economic and economic optimum thresholds for two annual weeds in soybeans. Weed Technol. 6:228–235.Google Scholar
4. Bauer, T. A., Mortensen, D. A., Wicks, G. A., Hayden, T. A., and Martin, A. R. 1991. Environmental variability associated with economic thresholds for soybeans. Weed Sci. 39:564–569.Google Scholar
5. Begonia, G. B., Aldrich, R. J., and Salisbury, C. D. 1991. Soybean yield and yield components as influenced by canopy heights and duration of competition of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medik.). Weed Res. 31:117–124.Google Scholar
6. Burnside, O. C. 1993. Weed science—The step child. Weed Technol. 7:515–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Bussler, B. H. 1993. Corn interactions with common cocklebur and velvetleaf. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota, St. Paul MN, 103 pp.Google Scholar
8. Cousens, R. 1985. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 107:239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Cousens, R., Doyle, C. J., Wilson, B. J., and Cussans, G. W. 1986. Modelling the economics of controlling Avena fatua in winter wheat. Pestic. Sci. 17:1–12.Google Scholar
10. Dekker, J. and Meggitt, W. F. 1983. Interference between velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic.) and soybean (Glycine max (L). Merr.). I. Growth. Weed Res. 23:91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Doyle, C. J., Cousens, R., and Moss, S. R. 1986. A model of the economics of controlling Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. in winter wheat. Crop Prot. 5:143–150.Google Scholar
12. Fernandez-Quintanilla, C., Navarette, L., Anduajar, J. L. G., Fernandez, A., and Sanchez, M. J. 1986. Seedling recruitment and age-specific survivorship and reproduction in populations of Avena sterilis L. ssp. ludoviciana (Durieu) Nyman. J. Appl. Ecol. 23:945–955.Google Scholar
13. Firbank, L. G. and Watkinson, A. R. 1986. Modelling the population dynamics of an arable weed and its effects upon crop yield. J. Appl. Ecol. 23:147–159.Google Scholar
14. Fryer, J. D. and Chancellor, R. J. 1970. Evidence of changing weed populations in arable land. Proc. British Weed Control Conf. 10:958–964.Google Scholar
15. Green, R. J. and Wiley, G. L. 1987. Verticillium dahliae as a biocontrol agent of velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti . Can. J. Plant Path. 9:81.Google Scholar
16. Gressel, J. 1992. Addressing real weed science needs with innovations. Weed Technol. 6:509–525.Google Scholar
17. Gonzalez-Andujar, J. L. and Fernandez-Quintanilla, C. 1991. Modelling the population dynamics of Avena sterilis under dry-land cereal cropping systems. J. Appl. Ecol. 28:16–27.Google Scholar
18. Hagood, E. S. Jr. 1980. Growth analysis and growth simulation of soybeans in competition with velvetleaf and jimsonweed. Ph. D. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette IN, 137 pp.Google Scholar
19. Harper, J. L. 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London UK.Google Scholar
20. Hayden, T. A. 1988. Interference of common sunflower, tall waterhemp and velvetleaf in soybeans and growth and herbicide response of selected pigweed species. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Nebraska, Lincoln NE, 108 pp.Google Scholar
21. Howard, C. L., Mortimer, A. M., Gould, P., Putwain, P. D., Cousens, R., and Cussans, G. W. 1991. The dispersal of weeds: Seed movement in arable agriculture. Brighton Crop Protection Conference: Weeds 6C-5:821–828.Google Scholar
22. Khedir, K. D. and Roeth, F. W. 1981. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seed populations in six continuous corn (Zea mays) fields. Weed Sci. 29:485–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Kropff, M. J. and Lotz, L. A. P. 1992. Optimization of weed management systems: the role of ecological models of interplant competition. Weed Technol. 6:462–470.Google Scholar
24. Liebman, M. and Dyck, E. 1993. Weed management: A need to develop ecological approaches. Ecol. Appl. 3:39–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Maxwell, B. D., Roush, M. L., and Radosevich, S. R. 1990. Predicting the evolution and dynamics of herbicide resistant weed populations. Weed Technol. 4:2–13.Google Scholar
26. McCanny, S. J. and Cavers, P. B. 1988. Spread of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) in Ontario, Canada. 2. Dispersal by combines. Weed Res. 28:67–72.Google Scholar
27. Munger, P.H., Chandler, J. M., Cothren, J. T., and Hons, F.M. 1987. Soybean (Glycine max)—velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interspecific competition. Weed Sci. 35:647–653.Google Scholar
28. Norris, R. F. 1992. Ecological perspectives on utility of thresholds for weed management. Weed Technol. 6:182–183.Google Scholar
29. Norris, R. F. 1992. Case history for weed competition/population ecology: Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris). Weed Technol. 6:220–227.Google Scholar
30. Oliver, L. R. 1979. Influence of soybean (Glycine max) planting date on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) competition. Weed Sci. 27:183–188.Google Scholar
31. Pacala, S. W. and Silander, J. A. Jr. 1990. Field tests of neighborhood population dynamic models of two annual weed species. Ecol. Monogr. 60:113–134.Google Scholar
32. Pacala, S. W. and Weiner, J. 1991. Effects of competitive asymmetry on a local density model of plant interference. J. Theor. Biol. 149:165–179.Google Scholar
33. Radosevich, S. R. 1987. Methods to study interactions among crops and weeds. Weed Technol. 1:190–198.Google Scholar
34. Radosevich, S. R. and Ghersa, C. M. 1992. Weeds, crops, and herbicides: A modern-day “neckriddle.” Weed Technol. 6:788–795.Google Scholar
35. Roberts, H. A. and Dawkins, P. A. 1967. Effects of cultivation on the numbers of viable seeds in soil. Weed Res. 7:290–301.Google Scholar
36. SAS. 1988. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6.03. SAS Institute, Cary NC, 1028 pp.Google Scholar
37. Sickinger, S. M. 1981. The effects of Verticillium dahliae (Kleb.) on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and crops. M.S. Thesis, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison. 141 pp.Google Scholar
38. Silvertown, J. W. 1987. Introduction to plant population ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York NY.Google Scholar
39. Solbrig, O. T. 1981. Studies on the population biology of the genus Viola. II. The effect of plant size on fitness in Viola sororia . Evolution 35:1080–1093.Google Scholar
40. Stoller, E. W., Harrison, S. K., Wax, L. M., Regnier, E. E., and Nafziger, E. D. 1987. Weed interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Rev. Weed Sci. 3:155–181.Google Scholar
41. Warwick, S. I. and Black, L. D. 1988. The biology of Canadian weeds. 90. Abutilon theophrasti . Can. J. Plant Sci. 68:1069–1085.Google Scholar
42. Watkinson, A. R., Lonsdale, W. M., and Andrew, M. H. 1989. Modelling the population dynamics of an annual plant Sorghum intrans in the wet-dry tropics. J. Ecol. 77:162–181.Google Scholar
43. Weiner, J. 1985. Size hierarchies in experimental populations of annual plants. Ecology 66:743–752.Google Scholar
44. Wyse, D. L. 1992. Future of weed science research. Weed Technol. 6:162–165.Google Scholar
45. Zanin, G. and Sattin, M. 1988. Threshold level and seed production of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrast Medicus) in Maize. Weed Res. 28:347–352.Google Scholar