Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T08:41:23.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bearded sprangletop (Diplachne fusca ssp. fascicularis) flooding tolerance in California rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2019

Katie E. Driver Open the ORCID record for Katie E. Driver [Opens in a new window] ,
Kassim Al-Khatib Open the ORCID record for Kassim Al-Khatib [Opens in a new window]  and
Amar Godar
Katie E. Driver
Affiliation:
Graduate Student Researcher, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
Kassim Al-Khatib*
Affiliation:
Melvin Androus Endowed Professor for Weed Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
Amar Godar
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Research Associate, University of California, Davis, California Rice Experiment Station, Biggs, CA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Kassim Al-Khatib, Melvin Androus Endowed Professor for Weed Science, Department of Plant Sciences, MS4, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, 95616. Email: kalkhatib@ucdavis.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bearded sprangletop is a problematic weed in California rice production. The objective of this research was to determine the response of two bearded sprangletop biotypes (clomazone-susceptible [S] and -resistant [R]) to flooding depth. A study was conducted in 2017 and 2018 at the California Rice Experiment Station in Biggs, CA, to evaluate the flooding tolerance of the two biotypes against 5-, 10-, and 20-cm continuous flooding depths. Plant emergence, plant height, panicles per plant, seed per panicle, 100-seed weight, and seed per plant data were collected. At the 5-cm flood depth, neither biotype was controlled, and the R biotype had 260% more emergence, produced 475% more panicles per plant, and 455% more seed per plant than the S biotype. With a 10-cm flood, only the R biotype survived flooding and produced more panicles per plant and seed per plant than any other flood depth–biotype combination evaluated. There was no emergence of either bearded sprangletop biotype at the 20-cm flood depth. Continuous flooding can still be used as a management tool to control bearded sprangletop; however, the depth of flooding appears to limit emergence of S biotypes at 5 cm and R biotypes at 10 cm, and completely inhibits growth of both biotypes at 20 cm. The results of this study indicate that clomazone-resistant bearded sprangletop is more likely to spread throughout the Sacramento Valley because this biotype can survive clomazone applications and can tolerate a standard 10-cm flood.

Keywords

Eric Webster, Louisiana State University AgCenterClomazonebearded sprangletop, Diplachne fusca (L.) P. Beauv. ex Roem. & Schult. ssp. fascicularis (Lam.) P. M. Peterson & N. Snowrice, Oryza sativaOxidative stressresistance
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , April 2020 , pp. 193 - 196
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adair, CR, Engler, K (1955) The irrigation and culture of rice. Pages 389–394in Water. U.S. Department of Agriculture Yearbook of Agriculture. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar
Altop, EK, Husrev, M, Phillippo, CJ, Zandstra, BH (2015) Effect of burial depth and environmental factors on the seasonal germination of bearded sprangletop (Leptochloa fusca [L.] Kunth ssp. fascicularis [Lam.] N. Snow). Weed Biol Manag 15:147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, DE, Hill, JE, Seaman, DE (1985) Rice (Oryza sativa). Pages 262–268in Principles of Weed Control in California. Fresno, CA: Thomson PublishersGoogle Scholar
Benvenuti, S, Dinelli, G, Bonetti, A (2004) Germination ecology of Leptochloa chinensis: a new weed in the Italian rice agro-environment. Weed Res 44:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brim-DeForest, W, Alarcon-Reverte, R, Fischer, AJ (2015) Resistance of Leptochloa fusca spp. fasicularis (bearded sprangletop) to ACCase inhibitors in California rice. Page 82in Proceedings of the 67th California Weed Science Society. Santa Barbara, CA: California Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Brim-Deforest, W, Al-Khatib, K, Fischer, AJ (2017) Predicting yield losses in rice mixed-weed species infestations in California. Weed Sci 65(1):61–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, VF III, Talbert, RE, Baltazar, AM, Smith, RJ Jr. (1992) Evaluation of propanil resistant barnyard grass in Arkansas. Page 120in Proceedings of the 24th Rice Technical Working Group. College Station, TX: Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University SystemGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, SB, Johnson, DE (2008) Germination ecology of Chinese sprangletop (Leptochloa chinensis) in the Philippines. Weed Sci 56:820–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Johnson, DE (2011) Ecological studies on Echinochloa crus-galli and the implications for weed management in direct-seeded rice. Crop Prot 30:1385–1391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driver, KE (2019) Characterization of clomazone resistance and control in Leptochloa fusca spp. Fasicularis populations from California rice fields. Ph.D. dissertation. Davis, CA: University of California-Davis. 83 pGoogle Scholar
Estioko, PMB, Baltazar, AM, Merca, FE, Ismail, AM, Johnson, DE (2014) Differences in responses to flooding by germinating seeds of two contrasting rice cultivars and two species of economically important grass weeds. AoB Plants 6:plu064CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, AJ, Ateh, CM, Bayer, DE, Hill, JE (2000) Herbicide-resistant Echinochloa oryzoides and E. phyllopogon in California Oryza sativa fields. Weed Sci 48:225–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, TC, Mujer, CV, Andrews, DL, Williams, AS, Cobb, BG, Kennedy, RA, Rumpho, ME (1995) Identification and gene expression of anaerobically induced enolase in Echinochloa phyllopogon and Echinochloa crus-pavonis. Plant Physiol 109:433–443CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukao, T, Kennedy, RA, Yamasue, Y, Rumpho, ME (2003) Genetic and biochemical analysis of anaerobically-induced enzymes during seed germination of Echinochloa crus-galli varieties tolerant and in-tolerant of anoxia. J Exp Bot 54:1421–1429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, DW (1978) The grasses of Florida. Ph.D. dissertation. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida. 336 pGoogle Scholar
Ismail, AM, Johnson, DE, Ella, ES, Vergara, GV, Baltazar, AM (2012) Adaptation to flooding during emergence and seedling growth in rice and weeds, and implications for crop establishment. AoB Plants 2012: pls019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, RA, Barrett, SCH, VanderZee, D, Rumpho, ME (1980) Germination and seedling growth under anaerobic conditions in Echinochloa crus-galli (barnyard grass). Plant Cell Environ 3:243–248Google Scholar
McCarty, LB, Porter, DW, Colvin, DL, Shilling, DG, Hall, DW (1995) Controlling two sprangletop (Leptochloa spp.) species with preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol 9:29–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osuna, MD, Vidotto, F, Fischer, AJ, Bayer, DE, De Prado, R, Ferrero, A (2002) Cross resistance to bispyribac-sodium and bensulfuron-methyl in Echinochloa phyllopogon and Cyperus difformis. Pestic Biochem Physiol 73:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, DM, Jackson, MB (1991) Comparison of growth responses of barnyard grass (Echinochloa oryzoides) and rice (Oryza sativa) to submergence, ethylene, carbons dioxide and oxygen shortage. Ann Bot 68:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, DM, Jackson, MB (1992) The effects of oxygen, carbon dioxide, and ethylene on ethylene biosynthesis in relation to shoot extension in seedlings of rice (Oryza sativa) and barnyard grass (Echinochloa oryzoides). Ann Bot 69:441–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pittelkow, CM, Fischer, AJ, Moechnig, MJ, Hill, JE, Koffler, KB, Mutters, RG, Greer, CA, Cho, YS, van Kessel, C, Linquist, BA (2012) Agronomic productivity and nitrogen requirements of alternative tillage and crop establishment systems for improved weed control in direct-seeded rice. Field Crops Res 130:128–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz-Santaella, JP, De Prado, R, Wagoner, J, Fischer, AJ, Gerhards, R (2006) Resistance mechanisms to cyhalofop-butyl in a biotype of Echinochloa phyllopogon (Stapf) Koss. from California. J Plant Dis Protec 20:95–100Google Scholar
Rumpho, ME, Kennedy, RA (1981) Anaerobic metabolism in germinating seeds of Echinochloa crus-galli (barnyard grass): metabolite and enzyme studies. Plant Physiol 68:165–168CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, RJ, Jr (1983) Competition of bearded sprangletop (Leptochloa fascicularis) with rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci 31:120–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[UCANR] University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources (2012) Integrated Pest Management for Rice. Oakland, CA: University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources. p 30Google Scholar
VanderZee, D, Kennedy, RA (1981) Germination and seedling growth in Echinochloa crus-galli var. oryzicola under anoxic conditions: structural aspects. Am J Bot 68:1269–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasuor, H, TenBrook, PL, Tjeerdema, RS, Fischer, AJ (2008) Responses to clomazone and 5-ketoclomazone by Echinochloa phyllopogon resistant to multiple herbicides in Californian rice fields. Pest Manage Sci 64:1031–1039CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yasuor, H, Zou, W, Tolstikov, VV, Tjeerdema, RS, Fischer, AJ (2010) Differential oxidative metabolism and 5-ketoclomazone accumulation are involved in Echinochloa phyllopogon resistance to clomazone, Plant Physiol 153:319–326CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuan, S, Yingjie, D, Yueyang, C, Yongrui, C, Jingzuan, C, Deng, W (2019) Target-site resistance to cyhalofop-butyl in bearded sprangletop (Diplachne fusca) from China. Weed Sci 23:1–5Google Scholar
Yun, MS, Yogo, Y, Miura, R, Yamasue, Y, Fischer, AJ (2005) Cytochrome P-450 monooxygenase activity in herbicide-resistant and -susceptible late watergrass (Echinochloa phyllopogon). Pestic Biochem Physiol 83:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, F, Lin, J, Fox, TC, Mujer, CV, Rumpho, ME, Kennedy, RA (1994) Effect of aerobic priming on the response of Echinochloa crus-pavonis to anaerobic stress. Plant Physiol 104:1149–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar