Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T00:05:08.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Critical Period of Weed Control in No-Till Soybean (Glycine max) and Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Chris Halford ,
Allan S. Hamill ,
John Zhang  and
Colleen Doucet
Chris Halford
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7
Allan S. Hamill*
Affiliation:
Greenhouse and Processing Crops Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Harrow, Ontario, Canada N0R 1G0
John Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Colleen Doucet
Affiliation:
Scientific Evaluator, Pest Management Regulatory Agency, 7th Floor, Room E721, Tupper Building, 2720 Riverside Dr., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0K9
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: hamilla@em.agr.ca.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The critical period of weed control for crops grown under conventional tillage systems has been well studied, and the results generated by these studies have been proven to be very useful in developing ecologically and economically sound weed management practices. However, these management systems may not be directly applicable under no-till situations because the species composition, total amount, and temporal pattern of seedling emergence change substantially with tillage. The objective of this study was to identify the critical period of weed control for soybean and corn in fields that had been under no-till management for 1 yr. Although estimates of the critical period for a crop vary from year to year and site to site, some interesting comparisons can be made between no-till and conventional tillage. The start of the critical period in no-till corn was stable, usually beginning at the six-leaf stage. The end of the critical period was more variable ranging from the 9- to 13-leaf stage. The critical period for corn under no-till conditions tended to start and end earlier than under conventional tillage practices. In soybean, we were unable to identify a critical period at one of the sites. At the other location (sandy loam soil), the critical period was estimated to begin at the first or second node developmental stage, whereas the end was determined to be at the R1 stage (early flowering). The critical period in soybean was longer than that observed under conventional tillage.

Keywords

Corn, Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3573’soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Northrup King 2492’Weed interferencecrop yield lossDAEdays after emergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , December 2001 , pp. 737 - 744
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Brown, H. J., Cruse, R. M., and Colvin, J. S. 1989. Tillage system effects on crop growth and production costs for a corn-soybean rotation. J. Prod. Agric. 2: 273–279.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. 1988. Factors influencing fluorochloridone activity in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 36: 207–214.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. 1995. Influence of tillage systems on weed population dynamics and management in corn and soybean in the central USA. Crop Sci. 35: 1,247–1,258.Google Scholar
Coffman, C. B. and Frank, J. R. 1991. Weed-crop responses to weed management systems in conservation tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 5: 76–81.Google Scholar
Doll, J., Doersch, R., Proost, R., and Kivlin, P. 1992. Reduced herbicide rates: aspect to consider. University of Wisconsin-Extension. 8 p.Google Scholar
Fehr, W. R. and Caviness, C. E. 1977. Stages of soybean development. Iowa State Univ. Coop. Ext. Serv. Spec. Rep. 80. 12 p.Google Scholar
Fortin, M. C. and Hamill, A. S. 1994. Rye residue geometry for faster corn development. Agron. J. 86: 238–243.Google Scholar
Griffith, D. R., Mannering, J. V., and Box, J. E. 1986. Soil and moisture management with reduced tillage. In Sprague, M. A. and Triplett, G. B., eds. No-Tillage and Surface Tillage Agriculture. New York: J. Wiley. pp. 19–58.Google Scholar
Hairston, J. E., Stanford, J. O., Hates, J. C., and Reinschmiedt, L. L. 1984. Crop yield, soil erosion, and net returns from five tillage systems in the Mississippi Blackland Prairie. J. Soil Water Conserv. 39: 391–395.Google Scholar
Hall, M. R., Swanton, C. J., and Anderson, G. W. 1992. The critical period of weed control in grain corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 40: 441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, J. L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. New York: Academic Press. pp. 151–194.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, P. E. 1990. Agronomy's role in sustainable agriculture: integrated farming systems. J. Prod. Agric. 3: 285–288.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Dilbeck, J. S., Defelice, M. S., and Kendig, J. A. 1998. Weed control with reduced rates of chlorimuron plus metribuzin and imazethapyr in no-till narrow-row soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 12: 32–36.Google Scholar
Klassen, P. 1991. Conservation tillage still on the rise. Farm Chem. 154:49.Google Scholar
Koskinen, W. C. and McWhorter, C. G. 1986. Weed control in conservation tillage. J. Soil Water Conserv. 41: 365–370.Google Scholar
Nowak, P. J. 1983. Obstacles to adoption of conservation tillage. J. Soil Water Conserv. 38: 162–165.Google Scholar
Reganold, J. P., Papendick, R. I., and Parr, J. F. 1990. Sustainable agriculture. Sci. Am. 1990: 112–120.Google Scholar
Shelby, P. P. Jr., Coffey, D. L., Rhodes, G. N. Jr., and Jeffery, L. S. 1988. Tomato production and weed control in no-tillage versus conventional tillage. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 113: 675–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanton, C. J. and Weise, S. F. 1991. Integrated weed management: the rationale and approach. Weed Technol. 5: 657–663.Google Scholar
Van Acker, R. C., Swanton, C. J., and Weise, S. F. 1993. The critical period of weed control in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Weed Sci. 41: 194–200.Google Scholar
Weaver, S. E. and Cavers, P. B. 1978. The effects of date of emergence and emergence order on seedling survival in Rumex crispus and R. obtusifolius . Can. J. Bot. 57: 730–738.Google Scholar
Weaver, S. E. and Tan, C. S. 1983. Critical period of weed interference in transplanted tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum): growth analysis. Weed Sci. 31: 476–481.Google Scholar
Wilcox-Lee, D. and Drost, D. T. 1991. Tillage reduces yield and crown, fern, and bud growth in a mature asparagus planting. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 116: 937–941.Google Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L. 1980. Weed-crop competition—a review. Int. Plant Prot. Ctr., Oregon State University Corvallis, OR. 175 p.Google Scholar