Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T07:31:16.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Group characteristics of tea growers relative to weed management: a case study in southwestern China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2019

Guoqi Chen*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, and Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
Bin Zhang
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Plant Protection and Quarantine Station of Guiyang City, Guiyang 550081, China
Qiong Wu
Affiliation:
Research Assistant and Professor, Plant Protection and Quarantine Station of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550001, China
Linhong Jin
Affiliation:
Professor, State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
Zhuo Chen
Affiliation:
Professor, State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
Xiaofeng Tan*
Affiliation:
Research Assistant and Professor, Plant Protection and Quarantine Station of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550001, China
*
Guoqi Chen, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China (Email: chenguoqi@yzu.edu.cn).
Authors for correspondence: Xiaofeng Tan, Plant Protection and Quarantine Station of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550001, China (Email: tanxf@263.net.cn)

Abstract

Farmer training is important to improve weed management practices in tea cultivation. To explore the group characteristics of tea growers, we interviewed 354 growers in Guizhou Province, China. Sixty-one percent of the respondents planted tea for companies or cooperative groups, and 56% managed tea gardens larger than 10 ha. Self-employed tea growers tended to be older and smallholders, and to apply herbicides and conduct weed control less frequently (P < 0.05). Approximately 87% of the respondents conducted weed control two to four times yr−1, 83% spent between $200 and $2,000 ha−1 yr−1 for weed control, and 42% thought weed control costs would decrease by 5 years from this study. Twenty-eight species were mentioned by the respondents as being the most serious. According to canonical correspondence analysis, latitude, altitude, being self-employed or a member of a cooperative, having training experience in tea-garden weed management, and frequency and cost of weed control in tea gardens had significant (P < 0.05) influence on the composition of most troublesome weed species listed by respondents. Among the respondents, 60% had had farmer’s training on weed management in tea gardens. Of these, a significant number (P < 0.05) tended to think weed control costs would decrease, and a nonsignificant number (P > 0.05) tended to conduct weed control more frequently and have lower weed management costs in their tea gardens.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

Bajwa, AA, Sadia, S, Ali, HH, Jabran, K, Peerzada, AM, Chauhan, BS (2016) Biology and management of two important Conyza weeds: a global review. Environ Sci Pollut R 23:2469424710 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borcard, D, Gillet, F, Legendre, P (2011) Numerical Ecology with R. New York, NY: Springer CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caviglia-Harris, JL (2018) Agricultural innovation and climate change policy in the Brazilian Amazon: intensification practices and the derived demand for pasture. J Environ Econ Manag 90:232248 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, GQ, Guo, SL, Huang, QS (2009) Invasiveness evaluation of fireweed (Crassocephalum crepidioides) based on its seed germination features. Weed Biol Manag 9:123128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, M, Wichmann, B, Luckert, M, Winowiecki, L, Forch, W, Laderach, P (2018) Diversification and intensification of agricultural adaptation from global to local scales. Plos ONE 13:e0196392 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, ZQ, Gong, X, Chen, J, Li, QY, Wang, LJ, Zhou, YF (2014) Research and analysis on optimal adjustment of planting tea varieties in Guizhou [in Chinese]. Seed 33:8185 Google Scholar
[CPIN] China Pesticide Information Network (2019) www.chinapesticide.org.cn. Accessed: June 25, 2019Google Scholar
Damalas, CA, Koutroubas, SD (2017) Farmers' training on pesticide use is associated with elevated safety behavior. Toxics 5:19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
eFloras.org. Flora of China. http://www.efloras.org/flora_page.aspx?flora_id=2. Accessed: June 25, 2019Google Scholar
[FAOSTAT] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Statistics Division (2018) World tea production in 2016. www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Accessed: November 22, 2018Google Scholar
Guo, YJ, Li, JJ, Busta, L, Jetter, R (2018) Coverage and composition of cuticular waxes on the fronds of the temperate ferns Pteridium aquilinum, Cryptogramma crispa, Polypodium glycyrrhiza, Polystichum munitum and Gymnocarpium dryopteris . Ann Bot 122:555568 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laforge, JML, Levkoe, CZ (2018) Seeding agroecology through new farmer training in Canada: knowledge, practice, and relational identities. Local Environ 23:9911007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, F, Hu, JC (2017) Report on the Development of Tea Industry in Guizhou 2016 [in Chinese]. Guiyang, China: Guizhou Science and Technology Press Google Scholar
Li, N, Yang, W, Fang, SB, Li, XH, Liu, ZC, Leng, X, An, SQ (2017) Dispersal of invasive Phytolacca americana seeds by birds in an urban garden in China. Integr Zool 12:2631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, XC, Qi, SY, Yao, J, Yang, L (2015) Genetic diversity and differentiation of invasive plant Galinsoga quadriradiata populations in China [in Chinese with English abstract]. Shengtaixue Zazhi 34:33063312 Google Scholar
National Bureau of Statistics of China (2017) Chinese National Statistic Yearbook 2016 [in Chinese]. Beijing, China: China Statistics Press Google Scholar
Schreinemachers, P, Wu, M-H, Uddin, MN, Ahmad, S, Hanson, P (2016) Farmer training in off-season vegetables: effects on income and pesticide use in Bangladesh. Food Policy 61:132140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srithi, K, Balslev, H, Tanming, W, Trisonthi, C (2017) Weed diversity and uses: a case study from tea plantations in northern Thailand. Econ Bot 71:147159 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, Y, Liang, Y, Long, M, Luo, X, Yan, D, Zhou, G (2007) Diversity of tea genetic resources and its innovation and utilization in Guizhou [in Chinese with English abstract]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences 35:114116 Google Scholar
Wang, F, Wang, C, Zhang, H, Yang, D (2014) Accelerate farmer's agricultural S&T training in Tibet. Environ Sci Technol 48:99599959 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, RJ, Wright, JP, Bradford, MA (2011) The putative niche requirements and landscape dynamics of Microstegium vimineum: an invasive Asian grass. Biol Invasions 13:471483 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, KH, Zhao, WQ, Liao, FL, Zhang, F, Qu, MX (2013) Study on ecological suitability of green tea garden in Guizhou Province [in Chinese with English abstract]. Earth and Environment 41:296302 Google Scholar
Yang, J, Yu, HY, Li, XJ, Dong, JG (2018) Genetic diversity and population structure of Commelina communis in China based on simple sequence repeat markers. J Integr Agr 17:22922301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, B, Chen, GQ, Yu, JY, Xu, D, Gen, K, Dong, LY, Tan, XF (2018) Weed diversity in tea gardens in Guizhou [in Chinese with English abstract]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences 31:25822588 Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Chen et al. supplementary material

Chen et al. supplementary material 1

Download Chen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 45.5 MB