Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T13:34:57.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interaction of Bromoxynil and Postemergence Graminicides on Large Crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

A. Stanley Culpepper ,
Alan C. York ,
Katherine M. Jennings  and
Roger B. Batts
A. Stanley Culpepper
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Alan C. York
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Katherine M. Jennings
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Roger B. Batts
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of bromoxynil on large crabgrass control by clethodim, sethoxydim, fluazifop-P, fluazifop-P plus fenoxaprop-P, and quizalofop-P was evaluated in 1996 and 1997 in bromoxynil-tolerant cotton and in fallow areas. Bromoxynil at 560 g ai/ha reduced large crabgrass control 4 weeks after treatment (WAT) when mixed with labeled rates of fluazifop-P, fluazifop-P plus fenoxaprop-P, or quizalofop-P. Control 9 WAT was reduced when bromoxynil was mixed with any of the graminicides. Antagonism with the mixtures was greatest with quizalofop-P, intermediate with fluazifop-P plus fenoxaprop-P and fluazifop-P, and least with clethodim and sethoxydim. Increasing the graminicide rate 50% in mixtures with bromoxynil alleviated antagonism only for clethodim. No antagonism was noted 9 WAT when bromoxynil was applied 3 d before or 3 d after application of clethodim or sethoxydim or when bromoxynil was applied 3 d after fluazifop-P plus fenoxaprop-P. Antagonism was observed when bromoxynil was applied 3 d before fluazifop-P plus fenoxaprop-P or when applied 3 d before or 3 d after fluazifop-P and quizalofop-P. Regardless of bromoxynil application, greatest yields were obtained from cotton treated with clethodim or sethoxydim. Bromoxynil applied 3 d before or 3 d after clethodim, sethoxydim, or fluazifop-P plus fenoxaprop-P did not reduce yield. Yield was reduced when bromoxynil was applied 3 d before or 3 d after application of fluazifop-P or quizalofop-P and when bromoxynil was mixed with any graminicide.

Keywords

Bromoxynil, 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrileclethodim, (E,E)-(±)-2-[1-[[(3-chloro-2-propenyl)oxy]imino]propyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-onefenoxaprop-P, (R)-2-[4-[(6-chloro-2-benzoxazolyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidfluazifop-P, (R)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidquizalofop-P, (R)-2-[4-[(6-chloro-2-quinoxalinyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidsethoxydim, 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-onelarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSAcotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville BXN 47.'Antagonismherbicide-tolerant cropsDIGSAPOST, postemergencePOT, POST over the topWAT, weeks after treatment
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 1998 , pp. 554 - 559
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Buchanan, G. A. 1992. Trends in weed control methods. In McWhorter, C. G. and Abernathy, J. R., eds. Weeds of Cotton: Characterization and Control. Memphis, TN: Cotton Foundation. pp. 47–72.Google Scholar
Byrd, J. D. Jr. and York, A. C. 1987. Interaction of fluometuron and MSMA with sethoxydim and fluazifop. Weed Sci. 35:270–276.Google Scholar
Corkern, C. B., Reynolds, D. B., Jordan, D. L., Griffin, J. L., Wilson, C. F., and Milligan, J. E. 1997. Influence of herbicide rates on annual grass control with Buctril–graminicide combinations. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:52.Google Scholar
Corkern, C. B., Reynolds, D. B., Vidrine, P. R., Griffin, J. L., and Jordan, D. L. 1996. Buctril–graminicide combinations antagonize johnsongrass control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 49:7.Google Scholar
Croon, K. A. and Merkle, M. G. 1988. Effects of bentazon, imazaquin, or chlorimuron on haloxyfop or fluazifop-P efficacy. Weed Technol. 2:36–40.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S. and York, A. C. 1997. Weed management in no-tillage bromoxynil-tolerant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 11:335–345.Google Scholar
Grey, T. L., Wilcut, J. W., and Richburg, J. S. III. 1993. Buctril efficacy on annual broadleaf weeds and mixtures with graminicides for grass control in Georgia cotton. In Herber, D. J. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, New Orleans, LA. Jan. 10–14, 1993. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America. p. 1530.Google Scholar
Holshouser, D. L. and Coble, H. D. 1990. Compatibility of sethoxydim with five postemergence broadleaf herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:128–133.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1993a. Interactions of DPX-PE350 with fluazifop-P, sethoxydim, clethodim, and quizalofop-P Weed Technol. 7:605–610.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Smith, M. C., McClelland, M. R., and Frans, R. E. 1993b. Weed control with bromoxynil applied alone and with graminicides. Weed Technol. 7:835–839.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, R. D. 1992. Review of the 1991 field trial results on bromoxynil-tolerant cotton. In Herber, D. J. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, Nashville, TN. Jan. 7–10, 1992. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America. p. 1316.Google Scholar
Meyers, P. F. and Coble, H. D. 1992. Antagonism of graminicide activity on annual grass species by imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 6:333–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minton, B. W., Kurtz, M. E., and Shaw, D. R. 1989. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control with grass and broadleaf herbicide combinations. Weed Sci. 37:223–227.Google Scholar
Paulsgrove, M. D., Wilcut, J. W., York, A. C., and Collins, J. 1996. Weed management in conventional tillage BXN cotton in North Carolina and Georgia. In Dugger, P. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, Nashville, TN. Jan. 9–12, 1996. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America. pp. 1533–1534.Google Scholar
Porter, W. C. 1993. Postemergence grass control in sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatus). Weed Technol. 7:812–815.Google Scholar
Rhodes, G. N. Jr. and Coble, H. D. 1984. Influence of application variables on antagonism between sethoxydim and bentazon. Weed Sci. 32:436–441.Google Scholar
Stalker, D. M., McBride, K. E., and Malyj, L. D. 1988. Herbicide resistance in transgenic plants expressing a bacterial detoxification gene. Science 242:419–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stapleton, G. S., Murdock, E. C., and Toler, J. E. 1994. Response of broadleaf weeds to Staple (DPX-PE 350), bromoxynil, and glyphosate. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:39.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R. 1989. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in soybeans (Glycine max) with postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:455–458.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R., Reynolds, D. B., and Blouin, D. C. 1995. Grass control in soybean (Glycine max) with graminicides applied alone and in mixtures. Weed Technol. 9:68–72.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., York, A. C., and Jordan, D. L. 1995. Weed management systems for oil seed crops. In Smith, A. E., ed. Handbook of Weed Management Systems. New York: Marcel-Dekker. pp. 343–400.Google Scholar
York, A. C. and Culpepper, A. S. 1998. Weed management in cotton. In Edmisten, K. E., ed. 1998 Cotton Information. Publ. AG-417. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. pp. 86–127.Google Scholar