Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T17:38:04.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interaction of Clethodim with Pyrithiobac and Bromoxynil Applied in Low Volume

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Joyce A. Tredaway ,
Michael G. Patterson  and
Glenn R. Wehtje
Joyce A. Tredaway
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Soils, Auburn University and Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn, AL 36849-5142
Michael G. Patterson
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Soils, Auburn University and Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn, AL 36849-5142
Glenn R. Wehtje
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Soils, Auburn University and Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn, AL 36849-5142
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse and field studies were conducted to determine the interaction of clethodim sprayed in low volume with pyrithiobac or bromoxynil and to determine the influence of these mixtures on large crabgrass control. A low-volume, air-assisted spraying system was calibrated to deliver 26 L/ha and was compared to a conventional hydraulic fan spraying system calibrated to deliver 140 L/ha. Greenhouse data indicated that carrier volume had no effect on large crabgrass control with clethodim. The addition of pyrithiobac to clethodim in mixture was antagonistic compared to control with clethodim applied alone. The addition of bromoxynil to clethodim in mixture was synergistic. Field studies showed similar results.

Keywords

Bromoxynil, 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrileclethodim, (E,E)-(±)-2-[1-[[(3-chloro-2-propenyl)oxy]imino]propyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-onepyrithiobac, 2-chloro-6-[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)thio]benzoic acidlarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSAAir assistdriftlow-volume sprayingCOC, crop oil concentrateDAT, days after treatmentLV, low volumeNIS, nonionic surfactantULV, ultra low volumePOST, postemergencePPI, preplant incorporated
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 1998 , pp. 185 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, W. H., ed. 1994. Herbicide Handbook. 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. 352 p.Google Scholar
Buchanan, G. A., 1992. Trends in weed control methods. <i>In</i> McWhorter, C. G. and Abernathy, J. R., eds. Weeds of Cotton: Characterization and Control. Memphis, TN: The Cotton Foundation. pp. 47–72.Google Scholar
Colby, S. R., 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22.Google Scholar
Corkern, C. B., Reynolds, D. B., Jordan, D. L., Griffin, J. L., Wilson, C. F., and Milligan, J. E. 1997. Influence of herbicide rates on annual grass control with Buctril–graminicide combinations. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:52.Google Scholar
Corkern, C. B., Reynolds, D. B., Vidrine, P. R., Griffin, J. L., and Jordan, D. L. 1995. Buctril Gel antagonizes johnsongrass control with Assure II, Fusilade DX, and Select. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:231.Google Scholar
Fehringer, R. J., and Cavaletto, R. A. 1991. Comparison of Drift from Hooded and Open-Boom Agricultural Ground Sprayers. ASAE Technical Paper 90-6510. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural Engineers. pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Ferreira, K. L., Burton, J. D., and Coble, H. D. 1995. Physiological basis for antagonism of fluazifop-P by DPX-PE350. Weed Sci. 43:184–191.Google Scholar
Grey, T. L., Wilcut, J. W., and Richburg, J. S. III. 1993. Buctril efficacy on annual broadleaf weeds and mixtures with graminicides for grass control in Georgia cotton. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf. 17:1530.Google Scholar
Hanks, J. E., and McWhorter, C. G. 1991. Variables affecting the use of positive displacement pumps to apply herbicides in ultra low volume. Weed Technol. 5:111–116.Google Scholar
Harker, K. N., and O'Sullivan, P. A. 1991. Synergistic mixtures of sethoxydim and fluazifop on annual grass weeds. Weed Technol. 5:310–316.Google Scholar
Harrison, M. A., Hayes, R. M., and Mueller, T. C. 1996. Environment affects cotton and velvetleaf response to pyrithiobac. Weed Sci. 44:241–247.Google Scholar
Hatzios, K. K., and Penner, D. 1985. Interactions of herbicides with other agrichemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1:1–63.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., 1995. Influence of adjuvants on the antagonism of graminicides by broadleaf herbicides. Weed Technol. 9:741–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1993a. Interactions of DPX-PE350 with fluazifop-P, sethoxydim, clethodim, and quizalofop-P. Weed Technol. 7:605–610.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Smith, M. C., McClelland, M. R., and Frans, R. E. 1993b. Weed control with bromoxynil applied alone and with graminicides. Weed Technol. 7:835–839.Google Scholar
Kepner, R. A., Bainer, R., and Barger, E. L. 1978. Principles of Farm Machinery. 3rd ed. Westport, CT: Avi. pp. 301–303.Google Scholar
Legg, B. J., and Miller, P.C.H. 1990. Drift Assessment Using Measurements and Mathematical Models. ASAE Technical Paper 90–1593. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural Engineers. pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G., Fulghum, F. E., and Barrentine, W. L. 1988. An air-assist spray nozzle for applying herbicides in ultra low volume. Weed Sci. 36: 118–121.Google Scholar
Minton, B. W., Kurtz, M. E., and Shaw, D. R. 1989. Barnyardgrass (<i>Echinochloa crus-galli</i>) control with grass and broadleaf herbicide combinations. Weed Sci. 37:223–227.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. H., Crowder, S. H., and Williams, C. S. 1992. “Staple”–a new cotton herbicide from DuPont. P. 1318 in Herber, D. J. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Nashville, TN. Jan. 6–10. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
Richburg, J. S. III, Wilcut, J. W., and Ingram, E. G. 1994. Weed efficacy with Buctril and Roundup. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf. 18:1702.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1989. SAS Software. Raleigh, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Smith, M. C., Frans, R., McClelland, M., and Carter, P. 1995. Summary of pyrithiobac (Staple) efficacy in cotton weed control programs. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:74–75.Google Scholar
Snipes, C. E., and Allen, R. L. 1996. Interaction of graminicides applied in combination with pyrithiobac. Weed Technol. 10:889–892.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R., Crawford, S. H., and Girlinghouse, J. M. 1993. DPX-PE350 interactions in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:26.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1994. Interactions of POST herbicides with Staple. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf. 18:1703.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M., and Coble, H. D. 1997. Changes in the weed species composition of the Southern United States: 1974 to 1995. Weed Technol. 11: 308–317.Google Scholar
Williford, J. R., and Fulgham, F. E. 1989. The Teemizer—A New Air-Atomizing Spray System. ASAE Technical Paper 89–1522. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural Engineers. pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
Young, B. G., Hart, S. E., and Wax, L. M. 1996. Interactions of sethoxydim and corn (<i>Zea mays</i>) postemergence broadleaf herbicides on three annual grasses. Weed Technol. 10:914–922.Google Scholar