Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T07:21:38.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transport of Atrazine and Metribuzin in Three Soils of the Humid Pampas of Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Francisco Bedmar ,
Jose Luis Costa ,
Elvira Suero  and
Daniel Gimenez
Francisco Bedmar*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Vegetal, Suelos e Ingeniería Rural, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, C.C. 276, 7620 Balcarce, Argentina
Jose Luis Costa
Affiliation:
Departamento de Agronomía, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria, INTA, C.C. 276, 7620 Balcarce, Argentina
Elvira Suero
Affiliation:
Departamento de Agronomía, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria, INTA, C.C. 276, 7620 Balcarce, Argentina
Daniel Gimenez
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 14 College Farm Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: fbedmar@balcarce.inta.gov.ar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Widespread groundwater contamination has prompted studies on the fate and transport of solute through soil. Large quantities of atrazine and metribuzin are applied annually in the Humid Pampas of Argentina, creating the need to study the fate of these herbicides in soils of the region. The objective of this work was to study the vertical transport of atrazine and metribuzin in packed soil columns for three loam soils representative of the Humid Pampas of Argentina. Bromide was used as a nonreactive tracer. The convection dispersion equation was fitted to chemical breakthrough data to obtain a parameter characterizing chemical transport. Bromide breakthrough curves (BTCs) were similar among soils. BTCs for atrazine and metribuzin revealed significant interaction among soils and herbicides. The average values for the organic carbon (OC) partition coefficients (Koc) derived from column flow experiments were 119 and 48 ml/g for atrazine and metribuzin, respectively. Metribuzin in leachate was 97.3% of the total recovered, whereas atrazine was 3.5%. This behavior can be explained by their different affinities to OC. The OC contents of the Balcarce, Necochea, and Nueve de Julio soils were 4.1, 3.4, and 1.9%, respectively. The lowest leaching values of herbicides were found in the Balcarce soil, suggesting that OC content was the main factor in controlling herbicide transport in these soils.

Keywords

AtrazinebromidemetribuzinGC/MSgroundwater contaminationherbicide transportsoil columnsBTC, breakthrough curveCDE, convection dispersion equationOC, organic carbonPV, pore volumePVC, polyvinyl chloride
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 2004 , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Barbash, J. E., Thelin, G. P., Kolpin, D. W., and Gilliom, R. J. 2001. Major herbicides in ground water: results from the National Water-Quality Assessment. J. Environ. Qual. 30:831–845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barriuso, E. and Houot, S. 1996. Rapid mineralization of the s-triazine ring of atrazine in relation to soil management. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28:1341–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barriuso, E. and Koskinen, W. C. 1996. Incorporating nonextractable atrazine residues into soil size fractions as a function of time. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60:150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkart, M. R. and Kolpin, D. W. 1993. Hydrologic and land-use factors associated with herbicides and nitrate in near-surface aquifers. J. Environ. Qual. 22:646–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capriel, P., Haisch, A., and Khan, S. U. 1985. Distribution and nature of bound (nonextractable) residues of atrazine in a mineral soil nine years after the herbicide application. J. Agric. Food Chem. 33:567–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comfort, S. D., Shea, P. J., and Roeth, F. W. 1994. Understanding Pesticides and Water Quality in Nebraska. Nebraska Cooperative Extension EC 94- 135. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska. 16 p.Google Scholar
Costa, J. L., Knighton, R. E., and Prunty, L. 1994. Model comparison of unsaturated steady-state solute transport in a field plot. J. Soil Sci. Soc. Am 58:1277–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di, H. J., Aylmore, L. A. G., and Kookana, R. S. 1998. Degradation rates of eight pesticides in surface and subsurface soils under laboratory and field conditions. Soil Sci 163:404–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinelli, G., Accinelli, C., Vicari, A., and Catizone, P. 2000. Comparison of the persistence of atrazine and metolachlor under field and laboratory conditions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 48:3037–3043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleming, G. F., Simmons, F. W., Wax, L. M., Wing, R. E., and Carr, M. E. 1992a. Atrazine movement in soil columns as influenced by starch-encapsulation and acrylic polymer additives. Weed Sci. 40:465–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, G. F., Wax, L. M., and Simmons, F. W. 1992b. Leachability and efficacy of starch-encapsulated atrazine. Weed Technol. 6:297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, G. F., Wax, L. M., Simmons, F. W., and Felsot, A. S. 1992c. Movement of alachlor and metribuzin from controlled release formulations in a sandy soil. Weed Sci. 40:606–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flury, M. 1996. Experimental evidence of transport of pesticides through field soils—a review. J. Environ. Qual. 25:25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortin, J., Flury, M., Jury, W. A., and Streck, T. 1997. Rate-limited sorption of simazine in saturated soil columns. J. Contam. Hydrol 25:219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funari, E., Donati, L., Sandroni, D., and Vighi, M. 1995. Pesticide levels in groundwater: value and limitations of monitoring. in Vighi, M. and Funari, E., eds. Pesticide Risk in Groundwater. Boca Raton, FL: CRC. Pp. 3–44.Google Scholar
Goss, D. W. 1992. Screening procedure for soils and pesticides for potential water quality impacts. Weed Technol. 6:701–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, R. E. and Karickhoff, S. W. 1990. Sorption estimates for modelling. in Cheng, H. H., ed. Pesticides in the Soil Environment: Processes, Impacts, and Modelling. Soil Science Society of America Book Series, no. 2. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America. Pp. 79–101.Google Scholar
Gustafson, D. I. 1995. Development of novel active ingredients. in Vighi, M. and Funari, E., eds. Pesticide Risk in Groundwater. Boca Raton, FL: CRC. Pp. 153–161.Google Scholar
Harper, S. S. 1988. Sorption of metribuzin in surface and subsurface soils of the Mississippi Delta region. Weed Sci. 36:84–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, L. and Halvorson, G. A. 1995. Pesticide Movement in Irrigated North Dakota Soils. Final Report of Subcontract with the Energy and Environmental Research Center. Mandan, ND: North Dakota State University Land Reclamation Research Center. 38 p.Google Scholar
Ivany, J. A., Sadler, J. M., and Kimball, E. R. 1983. Rate of metribuzin breakdown and residue effects on rotation crops. Can. J. Plant Sci 63:481–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenks, B. M., Roeth, F. W., Martin, A. R., and Mccallister, D. L. 1998. Influence of surface and subsurface soil properties on atrazine sorption and degradation. Weed Sci. 46:132–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. E., Banks, P. A., and Radcliffe, D. E. 1990. Alachlor and metribuzin movement and dissipation in a soil profile as influenced by soil surface condition. Weed. Sci 38:589–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladlie, J. S., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1976. Effect of soil pH on microbial degradation, adsorption, and mobility of metribuzin. Weed Sci. 24. 477–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, M. A., Harper, S. S., and Gaston, L. A. 1994. Metribuzin mobility and degradation in undisturbed soil columns. Soil Sci 157:279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maas, R. P., Kucken, D. J., Patch, S. C., Peek, B. T., and Van Engelen, D. L. 1995. Pesticides in Eastern North Carolina rural supply wells: land use factors and persistence. J. Environ. Qual. 24:426–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mervosh, T. L., Stoller, E. W., Simmons, F. W., Ellsworth, T. R., and Sims, G. K. 1995. Effects of starch encapsulation on clomazone and atrazine movement in soil and clomazone volatilization. Weed Sci. 43:445–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. L., Wollum, A. G. III, and Weber, J. B. 1997. Degradation of carbon- 14-atrazine and carbon-14-metolachlor in soil from four depths. J. Environ. Qual. 26:633–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorman, T. B. and Keller, K. E. 1996. Crop resistance to herbicides: effects on soil and water quality. in Duke, S. O., ed. Herbicide-Resistant Crops, Agricultural, Environmental, Economic, Regulatory, and Technical Aspects. Boca Raton, FL: CRC. Pp. 283–302.Google Scholar
Peter, J. C. and Weber, J. B. 1985. Adsorption, mobility, and efficacy of metribuzin as influenced by soil properties. Weed Sci. 33:868–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quiroga, A. R., Buschiazzo, D. E., and Peinemann, N. 1996. Soil organic matter particle size fractions in soils of the semiarid Argentinian pampas. Soil Sci 161:104–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, R. P., Baker, D. B., Creamer, N. L., Kramer, J. W., Ewing, D. E., Merryfield, B. L., and Wallrabenstein, L. K. 1996. Well water quality, well vulnerability, and agricultural contamination in the Midwestern United States. J. Environ. Qual. 25:389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, K. E. 1976. Adsorption and mobility of metribuzin in soil. Weed Sci. 24. 525–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapir, N. and Mandelbaum, R. T. 1997. Atrazine degradation in subsurface soil by indigenous and introduced microorganisms. J. Agric. Food Chem. 45. 4481–4486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharom, M. S. and Stephenson, G. C. 1976. Behaviour and fate of metribuzin in eight Ontario soils. Weed Sci. 24:153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonon, L. 1992. Persistence and Transport of Atrazine, Alachlor and Nitrate in Soils. Ph.D. thesis. Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS. 209 p.Google Scholar
Sonon, L. S. and Schwab, A. P. 1995. Adsorption characteristics of atrazine and alachlor in Kansas soils. Weed Sci. 43:461–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwick, L. M., Willis, G. H., Johnson, D. C., and Selim, H. M. 1995. Leaching of nitrate, atrazine and metribuzin from sugarcane in southern Louisiana. J. Environ. Qual. 24:684–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparling, G., Dragten, R., Aislabie, J., and Fraser, R. 1998. Atrazine mineralisation in New Zealand topsoils and subsoils: influence of edaphic factors and numbers of atrazine-degrading microbes. Aust. J. Soil Res 36:557–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolpe, N. B. and Shea, P. J. 1995. Alachlor and atrazine degradation in a Nebraska soil and underlying sediments. Soil Sci 160:359–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toride, N., Leij, F. J., and van Genuchten, M. Th. 1999. The CXTFIT Code for Estimating Transport Parameters from Laboratory or Field Tracer Experiments, Version 2.1. Research Rep. 137. Riverside, CA: U.S. Salinity Laboratory, USDA-ARS.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. 493 p.Google Scholar
Weber, J. B. 1994. Properties and behavior of pesticides in soil. in Honeycutt, C. and Schabacker, D. J., eds. Mechanisms of Pesticide Movement into Ground Water. Boca Raton, FL: CRC. Pp. 15–41.Google Scholar
Weber, J. B., Wilkerson, G. G., and Linker, H. M. et al. 2000. A proposal to standardize soil/solution herbicide distribution coefficients. Weed Sci. 48:75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. F., Nelson, S. D., and Gish, T. J. 1999. Release and leaching of starch-encapsulated atrazine in a calcareous soil. J. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 63. 425–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Workman, S. R., Ward, A. D., Fausey, N. R., and Nokes, S. E. 1995. Atrazine and alachlor dissipation rates from field experiments. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng 38:1421–1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar