Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T10:10:52.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conceptual Index

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2011

Stephen M. Shaffer
Stephen M. Shaffer
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Get access

Extract

Approaches to the study of international relations employ a wide variety of concepts and indicators. The interrelationships among these concepts often are specified in conceptual schemes, models, or theories. This supplementary issue of World Politics presents several approaches to international relations theory which utilize familiar concepts, such as decision-making, crisis, and interdependence, and also concepts (frequently borrowed from other disciplines) that are less familiar, e.g., entrepreneurial and consumer roles, free riders, and externalities. The diversity of approaches and the variety of models specified by the contributors led the co-editors to commission an index focusing on concepts and the variables used to tap the concepts (indicators) rather than a more traditional listing of names, places, and events.

Type
Index
Information
World Politics , Volume 24 , supplement S1: Theory and Policy in International Relations , Spring 1972 , pp. 248 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 A functional relationship of this sort is a develoomental sequence in which there is no direct effect of input on outcome. Rather, the input causes the intervening variables which in turn cause the outcome. See Hyman, Htrbert, Survey Design and Analysis: Principles, Cases, and Procedures (Glencoe, Ill. 1955), 254–63.Google Scholar

2 This is what is often termed a nonadditive relationship which states that the effect of the input varies as a function of the level of the intervening variables. The input thus can affect the outcome directly or influence the outcome via the mediation of the intervening factors. For a discussion of nonadditivity, see Blalock, Hubert, “Theory Building and the Statistical Concept of Interaction,” American Sociological Review, XXX (June 1965), 374–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar