Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T18:55:54.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epidemiological study of Trichosporon asahii infections over the past 23 years

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2020

Haitao Li
Affiliation:
Department of Dermatology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Dongcheng, 100700, Beijing, China
Meihong Guo
Affiliation:
Department of Dermatology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Dongcheng, 100700, Beijing, China
Congmin Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Dermatology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Dongcheng, 100700, Beijing, China
Yibo Li
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Center for Systems Biology, the University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX75080, USA
Anne Marie Fernandez
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ08028, USA
Thomas N. Ferraro
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ08103, USA
Rongya Yang*
Affiliation:
Department of Dermatology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Dongcheng, 100700, Beijing, China
Yong Chen*
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ08028, USA
*
Authors for correspondence: Rongya Yang, E-mail: rongyayang@gmail.com; Yong Chen, E-mail: chenyong@rowan.edu
Authors for correspondence: Rongya Yang, E-mail: rongyayang@gmail.com; Yong Chen, E-mail: chenyong@rowan.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Trichosporon is a yeast-like basidiomycete, a conditional pathogenic fungus that is rare in the clinic but often causes fatal infections in immunocompromised individuals. Trichosporon asahii is the most common pathogenic fungus in this genus and the occurrence of infections has dramatically increased in recent years. Here, we report a systematic literature review detailing 140 cases of T. asahii infection reported during the past 23 years. Statistical analysis shows that T. asahii infections were most frequently reported within immunodeficient or immunocompromised patients commonly with blood diseases. Antibiotic use, invasive medical equipment and chemotherapy were the leading risk factors for acquiring infection. In vitro susceptibility, clinical information and prognosis analysis showed that voriconazole is the primary drug of choice in the treatment of T. asahii infection. Combination treatment with voriconazole and amphotericin B did not show superiority over either drug alone. Finally, we found that the types of infections prevalent in China are significantly different from those in other countries. These results provide detailed information and relevant clinical treatment strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of T. asahii infection.

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Over the past 30 years, the incidence of fungal infection has increased dramatically in patients with cancer, deep burns, organ transplants and those under treatment with hormones and immunosuppressive agents, becoming one of the main causes of death in these individuals. In addition to common fungal infections such as candidiasis and aspergillosis, infections caused by non-candida yeast such as trichosporonosis are increasing in immunosuppressed, immunocompromised and immunodeficient individuals with severe conditions and high mortality rates [Reference Gross and Kan1Reference Izumi, Hisata and Hazama4]. Trichosporon is a yeast-like basidiomycete. It is ubiquitous in nature meaning it is present in soil, water, plants, mammals, birds, etc. and is also present among the human body's natural flora; however, it can become pathogenic to the humans in certain cases [Reference Haupt5Reference Candel8]. Hermann Beigel first proposed the concept of Trichosporon in 1865 and observed that it can cause hair infection. The classification and naming of Trichosporon has then changed multiple times over the years. Initially, all Trichosporon spp. were classified as Trichosporon beigelii, and it was thought that the strain mainly causes infection in superficial hair, and rarely causes deep-seated infection [Reference Gueho6]. However, subsequent research showed that T. beigelii has great morphologic variation, as well as physiological and biochemical variance [Reference Lee9]. In 1992, Gueho et al. revised the taxonomy of 20 species of Trichosporon, including six pathogens: Trichosporon asahii, T. asteroides, T. cutaneum, T. inkin, T. mucoides and T. ovoides [Reference Gueho6, Reference Gueho10Reference Sugita, Nishikawa and Shinoda12]. In 1994 and 1995, Sugita et al. reviewed the genus Trichosporon and proposed a new classification that included 17 different species of Trichosporon and five varieties [Reference Sugita13]. By 2002, the number of Trichosporon species had increased to 25, of which eight were associated with human infections, including two new species, T. domesticum and T. montevideense [Reference Sugita14]. Presently, 50 Trichosporon species are recognised, of which 16 are known to be pathogenic [Reference Fuentefria15Reference Pagnocca19].

Current research indicates that risk factors for Trichosporon infection include neutropaenia (an abnormally low amount of neutrophils), organ transplantation, diabetes, end-stage renal disease, HIV infection and use of immunosuppressive agents and invasive medical equipment [Reference Haupt5, Reference Gueho6, Reference Abdala20Reference Heslop27]. Trichosporonosis is associated with a variety of infection types, including superficial skin and hair infections, summer-type hypersensitivity pneumonitis (SHP), chronic pneumonia, meningitis, endocarditis, disseminated infections and fungaemia [Reference Nishiura28Reference Hajjeh and Blumberg41]. Trichosporon infections are also often misdiagnosed as other types of fungal infections [Reference Walsh42], and have proven difficult to treat. Before 2000, physicians recommended amphotericin B for treatment of Trichosporon infections; however, usage of this drug has been reported to be ineffective [Reference Skiada, Pavleas and Drogari-Apiranthitou43]. The combination of amphotericin B and flucytosine was also suggested for treatment [Reference Mathews and Prabhakar37, Reference Walsh44, Reference Ogata45], but no studies are published that compare effectiveness between combined and individual antifungal drug treatment. When azole pharmaceuticals appeared on the market (especially voriconazole), most in vitro susceptibility testing showed that they were superior to amphotericin B for treating trichosporosis [Reference Paphitou46Reference Toriumi48]; however, the in vitro effects of antifungal drugs are not fully representative of their therapeutic effectiveness in humans. The guidelines developed by ESCMID/ECMM in 2014 recommend voriconazole for the treatment of trichosporosis, although it is noted that the development of this guide relies mainly on in vitro susceptibility testing results, animal model test results and a few case reports [Reference Arendrup49].

Almost all cases of Trichosporon infection reported before 1994 were named T. beigelii. In contrast, isolates of Trichosporon spp. reported in the past 20 years are of various types, and numerous species of Trichosporon are known to exhibit different pathogenic characteristics. For example, T. asteroids and T. cutaneum are the main pathogenic species known to cause superficial skin infections [Reference Gueho6]. On the other hand, T. asahii is the most prominent clinical pathogen in the genus. T. asahii causes more than half of the infections of the genus [Reference Makinodan50], and the mortality caused by deep invasive infections is greater than 70%. In 1992, Gueho et al. [Reference Gueho6] proposed another classification of Trichosporon spp., and confirmed that T. asahii was the main pathogen causing deep trichosporosis.

The incidence of T. asahii infection has increased significantly in the past 20 years [Reference Gross and Kan1, Reference Bayramoglu3]. It is commonly found in immunodeficient and immunocompromised patients, and individuals with blood diseases [Reference Krzossok23, Reference Vashishtha, Mittal and Garg51, Reference Miura52]. A few studies also reported T. asahii infection in healthy individuals [Reference Ebright, Fairfax and Vazquez21, Reference Karabay22]. In addition, different species of Trichosporon possess different drug sensitivities. For example, amphotericin B has a higher minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against T. asahii, T. faecale and T. coremiiforme, while T. inkin, T. ovoides, T. japonicum, T. domesticum, T. montevideense and T. cutaneum have lower MICs [Reference Paphitou46, Reference Pfaller and Diekema53Reference Guo56]. Therefore, it is important to accurately analyse the epidemiological characteristics of different species of Trichosporon so the susceptibility and risk factors of infection can be obtained. This information can then enhance patient diagnosis, treatment, medication and outcome prediction.

Accurate epidemiological analysis of Trichosporon infections, especially T. asahii, can highlight susceptibility to infection and improve patient diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Although there is some literature reviewing Trichosporon disease [Reference Girmenia57Reference Guo59], a comprehensive analysis of epidemiological characteristics, clinical treatment and prognosis of T. asahii infection has not been published. Here we systematically analysed the epidemiological characteristics, risk factors, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment, medication and prognosis of T. asahii infections reported in the English literature from 1996 to 2019 and in Chinese literature from 2009 to 2019. We then compared the infections in China with those in other countries to determine significant differences in divergent clinical categories.

Materials and methods

Literature collection

In order to do a comprehensive analysis of clinical studies regarding T. asahii infections, we performed a systematic literature review to identify original cases in both English and Chinese literature. First, we reviewed all references from the PubMed database by using the keywords T. asahii, trichosporon asahii and trichosporonosis. The search was then limited to studies including human subjects, clinical trials and case reports. A search was also conducted on the Chinese medical database WANFANG (http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/index.html). To standardise analysis, the following patient information was examined for each case: time of onset, study area, demographic data, possible pathogenesis, type of underlying disease, source of specimen, identification method of strain, type and location of infection, treatment and outcome. Published studies with missing case information from any of these categories were excluded. All literature reviewed was published between 1996 and 2019.

Statistical analysis of epidemiological data

For each category, the distribution of data was analysed by using a descriptive statistical analysis. To understand the different causal factors and therapy results between 51 Chinese cases and 89 cases from other countries, we compared each cohort with respect to the patient information. A Fisher's exact test was used to compare the effectiveness of the three antifungal drug groups (amphotericin B; triazoles; amphotericin B plus triazoles), where P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient population

Systematic literature review yielded a total of 140 cases of T. asahii infection, including 51 cases in Chinese literature and 89 in English literature reported from 1996 to 2019. These cases were distributed throughout Asia, Europe, North and South America and Africa, in which Asia had the largest proportion (108/140, 77.1%). Cases reported from China, Japan and India represented 65.7% of the total. Among other countries and regions, 10 cases were reported from the United States (Fig. 1a). The number of cases in Asia dramatically increased from 2006 to 2015, but only 16 cases were observed in other years (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1. Basic statistical features of 140 cases of T. asahii infection. (a) Regional distribution. (b) Temporal distribution of 140 cases (year). (c) Age distribution.

Of the 140 patients with T. asahii infection, 83 were male (83/140, 59.3%), 47 were female (47/140, 33.6%) and the gender of remaining 10 patients was not reported (eight were newborn premature infants), achieving a ~1.77-fold ratio of males to females. The age of onset ranged from 0 to 92 years old, where the group of individuals over 65 years old represented the largest proportion (48/140, 34.3%). For cases from Asia, the older individual groups have higher proportions of T. asahii infection, which is also consistent with observations from Europe and the Americas (Fig. 1c).

Risk factors for T. asahii infection

Previous studies found divergent risk factors related to trichosporosis including antibiotic usage, invasive medical equipment, intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalisation and others [Reference Ruan, Chien and Hsueh60, Reference Kontoyiannis61]. Among the 140 patients with T. asahii infection, we also found that antibiotic and invasive medical equipment users were the two major groups with proportions of 46.4% (65/140) and 44.3% (62/140), respectively (Fig. 2a). Overall, the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, the use of invasive medical devices, neutropaenia and ICU hospitalisation remain the four greatest risk factors for T. asahii infection. Our results proved to be consistent with previous studies. For example, Kontoyannis et al. [Reference Kontoyiannis61] analysed 17 patients with trichosporosis and a history of oncology and found that 12 patients used central venous catheters and 11 patients had neutropaenia. Ruan et al. [Reference Ruan, Chien and Hsueh60] analysed 19 patients with disseminated trichosporosis infections in Taiwan between 2000 and 2008, and found that 18 patients used central venous catheters and 17 patients used broad spectrum antibiotics.

Fig. 2. Proportions of 140 cases on risk factors (a), infected tissues (b), test samples (c) and testing methods (d).

We further checked if prior antifungal treatment/prophylaxis is a risk factor for T. asahii infection. Based on the previous definitions of breakthrough invasive fungal infection (IFI) [Reference Cornely62], a total of 22 cases can be classified as breakthrough IFI during prophylaxis or empiric treatment (Table 1). Among them, amphotericin B (27.3%), echinocandin (22.7%) and fluconazole (13.6%) are three top used antifungal drugs with regard to risk for breakthrough IFI. Furthermore, IFI was also observed after prophylactic use of antifungal drugs in combination, e.g. fluconazole plus amphotericin B (9.1%). After targeted antifungal treatment of T. asahii infection, nine patients were cured but 13 died.

Table 1. Statistical summary of 22 breakthrough IFI with prior antifungal treatment/prophylaxis

Underlying disease types

Haematologic diseases (39/140, 27.9%), diabetes (19/140, 13.6%) and pulmonary diseases (17/140, 12.1%) were the three most common pre-existing illnesses in patients within the 140 T. asahii infection cases. Among the patients with blood diseases, 28 patients had leukaemia, accounting for 71.8%. There were also patients with other maladies and conditions such as AIDS, organ transplants and various cancers. Interestingly, five patients were apparently healthy prior to infection without any pre-existing illnesses (Table 2). The distribution of underlying diseases among T. asahii infections differs from the distribution observed among general Trichosporon infections. In a study of underlying diseases in patients with Trichosporon infection, Girmenia et al. [Reference Girmenia57] reported that the three most common pre-existing clinical conditions were haematological diseases, peritoneal dialysis and malignant tumours. Our study also showed that in patients with T. asahii infection, blood diseases (mainly blood cancer and neutropaenia) are most common, diabetes is second and lung disease follows as third.

Table 2. The underlying disease types of 140 patientsa with T. asahii infection

a Some patients have more than one underlying disease.

Clinical manifestations, type of infection and site of infection

The clinical manifestations of T. asahii infected patients were non-specific, but varied with different infection sites and types of infections. The major types of infections were urinary tract infection (35/140, 25%), fungaemia (33/140, 23.6%) and disseminated infection (20/140, 15.7%). A few other infections reported were SHP, peritonitis, infections found superficially on the skin and in hair, along with various other infection types (Table 3). Among the 140 patients with T. asahii infections, infection of the blood was the most common (47/140, 33.6%), followed by the urinary system (40/140, 28.6%), respiratory system (29/140, 20.7%) and integumentary system (21/140, 15.0%) (Fig. 2b).

Table 3. Clinical illnesses in patients with T. asahii infection

Strain identification methods

T. asahii was isolated from a variety of clinical specimens. Of the 140 patients studied, 47 were diagnosed using a specimen obtained from blood (33.6%), 39 were diagnosed from a urine specimen (27.9%) and 27 were diagnosed from a sputum specimen (19.3%). A complete description of samples used for testing can be found in Figure 2c. Of the 140 T. asahii cases, 135 cases (96.4%) described the method for identifying T. asahii. Morphological methods combined with biochemical methods were used most commonly (96/135, 71.1%). The antigen inhalation test was the identification method used for the five patients with SHP (Fig. 2d). Among the 135 cases, 128 patients (128/135 94.8%) were tested by using morphological methods (API 20C AUX yeast identification system, ID 32C yeast identification system, Vitek automatic microbial identification system). Biochemical techniques were used in 119 cases (119/135, 88.1%) and 24 cases (24/135, 18.4%) used a genetic method (LSU, D1/D2, ITS region nucleic acid sequence determination).

In vitro susceptibility test

Of the 140 patients with T. asahii infection, 91 had an in vitro susceptibility test, consisting of 10 cases from 1996 to 2005 and 81 cases from 2006 to 2019. Among the 10 patients who had an in vitro susceptibility test from 1996 to 2005, four of them were sensitive to the antifungal drug voriconazole. Of the 81 patients who had in vitro susceptibility test between 2006 and 2015, 41 were sensitive to voriconazole, accounting for 37.3% of all patients (Table 4). Among in vitro susceptibility test methods, the M27-A2, M27-A3 and E-test methods were used widely on T. asahii infection patients.

Table 4. Drug effectiveness by in vitro drug sensitivity test in 140 patientsa with T. asahii infection

a Some patients were sensitive to more than one drug.

Drug selection

Regarding treatment and medication options for T. asahii infection, the ESCMID/ECMM guidelines recommended the use of voriconazole for the treatment of trichosporosis in 2014. The guidelines were based on the results of in vitro susceptibility testing, animal model testing and supporting evidence from a few case reports of Trichosporon infection [Reference Arendrup49]. However, more than 50 species of Trichosporon have been identified currently and different species of Trichosporon exhibit different levels of sensitivity to drugs. For example, the MIC of amphotericin B for T. asahii, T. faecale and T. coremiiforme was relatively higher, than that for T. inkin, T. ovoides, T. japonicum, T. domesticum, T. montevideense and T. cutaneum [Reference Paphitou46, Reference Pfaller and Diekema53Reference Rodriguez-Tudela55]. Therefore, this guideline has a limited reference value for the usage of voriconazole in treatment of T. asahii infection.

Of the 140 patients with T. asahii infections, the treatment strategies were complex (Fig. 3a). The efficiency of single-drug therapy of amphotericin B was 70.6%, whereas the efficiency of triazole in antifungal therapy was 74.1%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.015). However, the efficacy of a combined dosage of amphotericin B and triazole was reduced to 57.9%. There was no significant difference between the combination group and the single drug group (P > 0.05), but the efficacy of triazole in anti-T. asahii infection was better than amphotericin B (P < 0.05).

Fig. 3. Statistical analysis of drug susceptibility testing and clinical outcome. (a) In vitro drug susceptibility testing of triazoles and amphotericin B. The P-value was calculated by using Fisher's exact test. (b) Mortality rate of different infection types.

Outcomes

Previous studies have shown that the mortality rate of Trichosporon infection can range from 53% to 80% [Reference Toriumi48, Reference Kontoyiannis61, Reference Suzuki63, Reference Krcmery, Krupova and Denning64], but these studies only examined the mortality rate, and did not analyse the specific cause of death. They failed to answer questions such as whether the patient died from Trichosporon infection or other underlying diseases or if the main cause of death was due to complications resulting from the underlying disease. To clarify the mortality rate due to T. asahii infection, we excluded patients who died from underlying diseases and other causes of death. Only patients with death caused by T. asahii infection were considered. Of the 140 patients with T. asahii infection, the overall mortality rate of 140 patients was 30.0%, and the mortality rate caused by T. asahii infection was 13.6%. Furthermore, mortality was different in patients with varying infection types of T. asahii. Fungaemia was associated with the highest mortality rate, 51.5%, including 30.3% caused by T. asahii infection. This was followed by disseminated infection at 40.0%. Of note, 35% of deaths were caused solely by T. asahii infection (Fig. 3b).

Comparative analysis of cases in China and other countries

Since there were a large number of patients reported in China, we also statistically compared the characteristics of Chinese patients with those of other countries. We found that fungaemia and pulmonary infection in Chinese patients was higher than in other countries (>3-fold). On the other hand, the number of patients with urinary tract infections in other countries was greater compared to China (>3-fold) (Fig. 4a). For risk factors, we confirmed that antibiotic treatment and invasive medical device users were the most common in both cohorts. However, the number of patients with risk factors such as chemotherapy, neutrophil reduction and bacterial infection was greater in other countries compared to China (>3-fold) (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4. Comparative analysis of 51 Chinese patients and 89 patients in other countries. Comparative distributions were shown for (a) infection types, (b) inducing factors, (c) drug sensitivity and (d) mortality.

For the methods of identification and diagnosis, both China and other countries used standard morphological and biochemical methods (>50%). The results of the in vitro drug sensitivity test were also very similar. Comparisons of clinical drug usage showed no difference, and both groups preferred triazoles and amphotericin B (Fig. 4c). However, the overall mortality rate reported in Chinese patients was lower (21.6%) than that of other countries (34.8%) (Fig. 4d).

Discussion

This study investigated 140 global T. asahii infection cases reported within the past 23 years. For statistical and comparative analysis, we used critical criteria to select both English and Chinese reports of T. asahii infections. We found that the number of T. asahii infections showed a dramatic increase from 2006 to 2015 (107 cases) in Asia. We also found that the patients in this study mainly used triazole antifungal drugs or amphotericin B alone, or the combination of triazoles and amphotericin B. The results showed that the antifungal effect of triazoles, such as voriconazole, fluconazole and itraconazole was the most effective in the treatment of T. asahii infection. This is consistent with the guidelines developed by ESCMID/ECMM in 2014. Furthermore, we found that the combined usage of amphotericin B and triazole was less effective than individual triazole drug usage. Therefore, our results suggest that the first recommended drug for the treatment of T. asahii infection should be a triazole. The statistical ranking of drug sensitivities based on in vitro susceptibility test (Table 4) suggests that voriconazole would be the first choice for treatment, followed by fluconazole, amphotericin B and itraconazole.

Since many of T. asahii infections were reported in Chinese, we further collected and investigated 51 Chinese cases. Through the comparison of cases between China and other countries, we found that although they are very similar for a majority of the criteria studied, there are still many differences. In particular, fungaemia and pulmonary infections were greater in Chinese patients, but urinary tract infections had a lower frequency in Chinese patients than in cases from other countries. Due to the strict inclusion criteria in this study, the actual incidence of T. asahii infections in the world is greater than 140 cases. Therefore, a more accurate epidemiological analysis of T. asahii infection requires collaboration with researchers from all over the world. We found that many types of clinical information, such as the infection process and the source of their pathogens, are missing. But this information could be valuable for understanding the infection process and mechanism of T. asahii. For example, a recent time series study of breakthrough IFIs [Reference Cornely62] defined different clinic trail patterns of breakthrough IFI. A similar analysis can be performed for T. asahii infections if detailed and time series clinic records can be amassed. Meanwhile, acting as a reference for the clinical drug selection to treat T. asahii infection, our study can be improved by precisely controlling confounding factors including weight, vital organ function, etc. that were inaccessible now. Therefore, specific information such as the appropriate therapeutic dose, maintenance dose and duration of treatment remain to be determined.

Financial support

This project was supported partly by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Numbers 81472892 and 81571972)

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Footnotes

*

Co-first authors.

References

Gross, JW and Kan, VL (2008) Trichosporon asahii infection in an advanced AIDS patient and literature review. AIDS (London, England) 22, 793795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biasoli, MS et al. (2008) Systemic infection caused by Trichosporon asahii in a patient with liver transplant. Medical Mycology 46, 719723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayramoglu, G et al. (2008) Breakthrough Trichosporon asahii fungemia in neutropenic patient with acute leukemia while receiving caspofungin. Infection 36, 6870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Izumi, K, Hisata, Y and Hazama, S (2009) A rare case of infective endocarditis complicated by Trichosporon asahii fungemia treated by surgery. Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 15, 350353.Google ScholarPubMed
Haupt, HM et al. (1983) Colonization and infection with Trichosporon species in the immunosuppressed host. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 147, 199203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gueho, E et al. (1994) Trichosporon on humans: a practical account. Mycoses 37, 310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugita, T et al. (2000) Isolation of Trichosporon asahii from environmental materials. Medical Mycology 38, 2730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Candel, FJ et al. (2019) Update in infectious diseases 2019. Revista Espanola de Quimioterapia 32, 19.Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, JW et al. (1990) Patterns of morphologic variation among isolates of Trichosporon beigelii. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 28, 28232827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gueho, E et al. (1992) Contributions to a revision of the genus Trichosporon. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 61, 289316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugita, T et al. (1999) Identification of medically relevant Trichosporon species based on sequences of internal transcribed spacer regions and construction of a database for Trichosporon identification. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 37, 19851993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugita, T, Nishikawa, A and Shinoda, T (1998) Rapid detection of species of the opportunistic yeast Trichosporon by PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 36, 14581460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugita, T et al. (1995) Taxonomic position of deep-seated, mucosa-associated, and superficial isolates of Trichosporon cutaneum from trichosporonosis patients. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 33, 13681370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugita, T et al. (2002) Sequence analysis of the ribosomal DNA intergenic spacer 1 regions of Trichosporon species. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 40, 18261830.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuentefria, AM et al. (2008) Trichosporon insectorum sp. nov., a new anamorphic basidiomycetous killer yeast. Mycological Research 112, 9399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gujjari, P et al. (2011) Characterization of oleaginous yeasts revealed two novel species: Trichosporon cacaoliposimilis sp. nov. and Trichosporon oleaginosus sp. nov. Mycologia 103, 11101118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugita, T et al. (2005) Trichosporon species isolated from guano samples obtained from bat-inhabited caves in Japan. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71, 76267629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taj-Aldeen, SJ et al. (2009) Molecular identification and susceptibility of Trichosporon species isolated from clinical specimens in Qatar: isolation of Trichosporon dohaense Taj-Aldeen, Meis & Boekhout sp. nov. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 47, 17911799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pagnocca, FC et al. (2010) Yeasts isolated from a fungus-growing ant nest, including the description of Trichosporon chiarellii sp. nov., an anamorphic basidiomycetous yeast. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 60, 14541459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abdala, E et al. (2005) Trichosporon asahii fatal infection in a non-neutropenic patient after orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplant Infectious Disease 7, 162165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebright, JR, Fairfax, MR and Vazquez, JA (2001) Trichosporon asahii, a non-Candida yeast that caused fatal septic shock in a patient without cancer or neutropenia. Clinical Infectious Diseases 33, E28E30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karabay, O et al. (2006) Trichosporon asahii fungemia in a patient with non-hematological malignancy. Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases 59, 129131.Google Scholar
Krzossok, S et al. (2004) Trichosporon asahii infection of a dialysis PTFE arteriovenous graft. Clinical Nephrology 62, 6668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tashiro, T et al. (1994) Disseminated Trichosporon beigelii infection in patients with malignant diseases: immunohistochemical study and review. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 13, 218224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbor, PR, Rotimi, VO and Fatani, H (1995) Paravertebral abscess caused by Trichosporon capitatum in a child with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Journal of Infection 31, 251252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, DG et al. (2001) Multidrug-resistant Trichosporon asahii infection of nongranulocytopenic patients in three intensive care units. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 39, 44204425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heslop, OD et al. (2011) Disseminated trichosporonosis in a burn patient: meningitis and cerebral abscess due to Trichosporon asahii. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 49, 44054408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishiura, Y et al. (1997) Assignment and serotyping of Trichosporon species: the causative agents of summer-type hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Journal of Medical and Veterinary Mycology 35, 4552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogawa, H et al. (1998) Seasonal chronic cough with sputum eosinophilia caused by Trichosporon cutaneum (Trichosporon asahii). International Archives of Allergy and Immunology 116, 162165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshizawa, Y et al. (1999) Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis in Japan: a nationwide epidemiologic survey. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 103, 315320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grauer, ME et al. (1994) Successful treatment of a Trichosporon beigelii septicemia in a granulocytopenic patient with amphotericin B and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Infection 22, 283286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miro, O et al. (1994) Trichosporon beigelii fungemia and metastatic pneumonia in a trauma patient. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 13, 604606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoss, BS, Sautter, RL and Brenker, HJ (1997) Trichosporon beigelii, a new neonatal pathogen. The American Journal of Perinatology 14, 113117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, CF et al. (1998) Trichosporon beigelii causing oral mucositis and fungemia: report of one case. Zhonghua Min Guo Xiao Er Ke Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi 39, 191194.Google ScholarPubMed
Manzella, JP, Berman, IJ and Kukrika, MD (1982) Trichosporon beigelii fungemia and cutaneous dissemination. Archives of Dermatology 118, 343345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marin, J et al. (1989) Trichosporon beigelii pneumonia in a neutropenic patient. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 8, 631633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathews, MS and Prabhakar, S (1995) Chronic meningitis caused by Trichosporon beigelii in India. Mycoses 38, 125126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reyes, CV, Stanley, MM and Rippon, JW (1985) Trichosporon beigelii endocarditis as a complication of peritoneovenous shunt. Human Pathology 16, 857859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinhart, HH et al. (1988) Prosthetic valve endocarditis caused by Trichosporon beigelii. The American Journal of Medicine 84, 355358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tashiro, T et al. (1995) Trichosporon beigelii pneumonia in patients with hematologic malignancies. Chest 108, 190195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hajjeh, RA and Blumberg, HM (1995) Bloodstream infection due to Trichosporon beigelii in a burn patient: case report and review of therapy. Clinical Infectious Diseases 20, 913916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, TJ et al. (2004) Infections due to emerging and uncommon medically important fungal pathogens. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 10, 4866.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skiada, A, Pavleas, I and Drogari-Apiranthitou, M (2017) Rare fungal infectious agents: a lurking enemy. F1000Research 6, 1917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walsh, TJ et al. (1992) Experimental Trichosporon infection in persistently granulocytopenic rabbits: implications for pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of an emerging opportunistic mycosis. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 166, 121133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogata, K et al. (1990) Two cases of disseminated Trichosporon beigelii infection treated with combination antifungal therapy. Cancer 65, 27932795.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paphitou, NI et al. (2002) In vitro antifungal susceptibilities of Trichosporon species. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 46, 11441146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takamura, S et al. (1999) Disseminated Trichosporonosis with Trichosporon asahii. European Journal of Dermatology 9, 577579.Google ScholarPubMed
Toriumi, Y et al. (2002) Antifungal pharmacodynamic characteristics of amphotericin B against Trichosporon asahii, using time-kill methodology. Medical Microbiology and Immunology 46, 8993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arendrup, MC et al. (2014) ESCMID And ECMM joint clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of rare invasive yeast infections. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 20, 7698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makinodan, K et al. (2005) A familial case of summer-type hypersensitivity pneumonitis possibly associated with bird breeder's lung diagnosed by bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi 43, 693699.Google ScholarPubMed
Vashishtha, VM, Mittal, A and Garg, A (2012) A fatal outbreak of Trichosporon asahii sepsis in a neonatal intensive care unit. Indian Pediatrics 49, 745747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miura, Y et al. (2007) Breakthrough infection of Trichosporon asahii in a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. International Journal of Hematology 85, 177178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfaller, MA and Diekema, DJ (2004) Rare and emerging opportunistic fungal pathogens: concern for resistance beyond Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 42, 44194431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez-Tudela, JL et al. (2005) Susceptibility patterns and molecular identification of Trichosporon species. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 49, 40264034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez-Tudela, JL et al. (2007) Genotype distribution of clinical isolates of Trichosporon asahii based on sequencing of intergenic spacer 1. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 58, 435440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, LN et al. (2019) Invasive infections due to Trichosporon: species distribution, genotyping, and antifungal susceptibilities from a multicenter study in China. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 57, e01505e01518.Google ScholarPubMed
Girmenia, C et al. (2005) Invasive infections caused by Trichosporon species and Geotrichum capitatum in patients with hematological malignancies: a retrospective multicenter study from Italy and review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 43, 18181828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liao, Y et al. (2015) Epidemiology and outcome of Trichosporon fungemia: a review of 185 reported cases from 1975 to 2014. Open Forum Infectious Diseases 2, ofv141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, LN et al. (2011) Three-locus identification, genotyping, and antifungal susceptibilities of medically important Trichosporon species from China. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 49, 38053811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruan, SY, Chien, JY and Hsueh, PR (2009) Invasive trichosporonosis caused by Trichosporon asahii and other unusual Trichosporon species at a medical center in Taiwan. Clinical Infectious Diseases 49, e11e17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kontoyiannis, DP et al. (2004) Trichosporonosis in a tertiary care cancer center: risk factors, changing spectrum and determinants of outcome. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 36, 564569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornely, OA et al. (2019) Defining breakthrough invasive fungal infection-position paper of the mycoses study group education and research consortium and the European confederation of medical mycology. Mycoses 62, 716729.Google Scholar
Suzuki, K et al. (2010) Fatal Trichosporon fungemia in patients with hematologic malignancies. European Journal of Haematology 84, 441447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krcmery, V, Krupova, I and Denning, DW (1999) Invasive yeast infections other than Candida spp. in acute leukaemia. Journal of Hospital Infection 41, 181194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Basic statistical features of 140 cases of T. asahii infection. (a) Regional distribution. (b) Temporal distribution of 140 cases (year). (c) Age distribution.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Proportions of 140 cases on risk factors (a), infected tissues (b), test samples (c) and testing methods (d).

Figure 2

Table 1. Statistical summary of 22 breakthrough IFI with prior antifungal treatment/prophylaxis

Figure 3

Table 2. The underlying disease types of 140 patientsa with T. asahii infection

Figure 4

Table 3. Clinical illnesses in patients with T. asahii infection

Figure 5

Table 4. Drug effectiveness by in vitro drug sensitivity test in 140 patientsa with T. asahii infection

Figure 6

Fig. 3. Statistical analysis of drug susceptibility testing and clinical outcome. (a) In vitro drug susceptibility testing of triazoles and amphotericin B. The P-value was calculated by using Fisher's exact test. (b) Mortality rate of different infection types.

Figure 7

Fig. 4. Comparative analysis of 51 Chinese patients and 89 patients in other countries. Comparative distributions were shown for (a) infection types, (b) inducing factors, (c) drug sensitivity and (d) mortality.