3 results
Barriers and enablers to a healthy lifestyle in people with infertility: a mixed-methods systematic review
- S. Torkel, R. Wang, R. Norman, L. Zhao, K. Liu, L. Moran, S. Cowan
-
- Journal:
- Proceedings of the Nutrition Society / Volume 83 / Issue OCE1 / April 2024
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 07 May 2024, E84
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
While there is a recognised role of optimising lifestyle behaviours such as diet and physical activity in the management of infertility, the best practice for lifestyle management of infertility remains unknown, and factors influencing the lifestyle behaviours of people with infertility are not well understood. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the barriers and enablers to a healthy lifestyle in people with infertility, from the perspectives of people with infertility and health professionals, in order to inform optimal behavioural change strategies for lifestyle management of infertility. Ovid MEDLINE(R), PsycINFO, EMBASE, EBM Reviews, and CINAHL Plus were searched from inception to 12th September 2022. Eligible studies were qualitative, quantitative or mixed-methods primary studies which explored barriers and/or enablers to lifestyle for infertility management, from the perspectives of people with infertility and/or health professionals. Two independent reviewers performed quality assessment, using the Centre for Evidence-Based Management Critical Appraisal of a Survey Tool (quantitative and mixed-methods studies) and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Checklist (qualitative and mixed-methods studies). Data were analysed by inductive thematic analysis with themes mapped to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour (COM-B) model(1) and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF)(2). Relevant behaviour change techniques (BCTs)(3) to target the identified enablers and barriers were suggested. After screening 10703 citations and 82 full-texts, 22 studies were included (12 quantitative, 7 mixed-methods and 3 qualitative) with 18 studies including women with infertility (n = 2442), 10 including men with infertility (n = 1372) and 6 including health professionals (n = 261). From the perspectives of people with infertility, themes related to capability (e.g. strategies for behaviour change), opportunity (e.g. limited time, resources and money) and motivation (e.g. interplay between lifestyle and emotional state); themes mapped to 8 TDF domains. From the perspectives of health professionals, themes related to capability (e.g. identification of patients appropriate for lifestyle intervention), opportunity (e.g. mode of delivery) and motivation (e.g. professional responsibility); themes mapped to 6 TDF domains. 34 BCTs were identified across the suggested interventions. This systematic review found that several interacting factors influence lifestyle in people with infertility as well as health professional behaviour with regards to provision of lifestyle interventions for infertility. These factors can be targeted for optimisation of interventions. In light of the limited number of qualitative studies, there is a need for more qualitative research to gain deeper insights into the perspectives of people with infertility and health professionals for further exploration of the complex and interacting factors which shape lifestyle during the fertility journey.
Assessing the influence of preconception diet on female fertility: a systematic scoping review of observational studies
- S. Alesi, N. Habibi, T.R. Silva, N. Cheung, S. Torkel, C.T. Tay, A. Quinteros, H. Winter, H. Teede, A. Mousa, J.A. Grieger, L.J. Moran
-
- Journal:
- Proceedings of the Nutrition Society / Volume 83 / Issue OCE1 / April 2024
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 07 May 2024, E83
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Preconception diet is a proposed modifiable risk factor for infertility(1). However, there is no official guidance for women in the preconception period as to which dietary approaches may improve fertility. A comprehensive synthesis of the relevant evidence is key to determine the potentially effective dietary patterns and components as well as evidence gaps, and to provide information for nutritional recommendations for couples planning a pregnancy. In this systematic scoping review, four electronic databases (Medline and EMBASE via Ovid processing, CAB Direct, and CINAHL via EBSCO) were searched for observational studies (prospective and retrospective cohort, cross-sectional, and case–control studies) from inception to 27 September 2021. Eligible studies included women of reproductive age during the preconception period, and evaluated exposures related to preconception diet and outcomes related to fertility. Results were synthesised using a descriptive approach. A total of 36 studies were eligible for inclusion (31 prospective, 3 cross-sectional, and 2 case–control studies) and were published between 2007 and 2022. Of the assessed dietary exposures, increased adherence to the Mediterranean diet displayed the strongest and most consistent association with improved clinical pregnancy rates. Reducing trans fatty acids (TFAs), saturated fatty acids, and discretionary food intake (fast food and sugar-sweetened beverages) were associated with improvements in live birth, clinical pregnancy rates, and related ART outcomes. The dietary components of seafood, dairy, and soy demonstrated inconsistent findings across the few included studies. Due to heterogeneity and the limited available literature on most exposures, there is insufficient evidence to support any specific dietary approach for improving fertility. However, following some of the dietary approaches outlined in this review (anti-inflammatory diets, reducing TFA, and discretionary food intake) are consistent with broad healthy eating guidelines, have little to no associated risk, and offer a plausible set of possible benefits. This warrants further exploration in randomised controlled trials.
Understanding barriers and facilitators to diet and physical activity modification in people with polycystic ovary syndrome: a mixed method systematic review
- M. McGowan, R. Garad, G. Wadhwani, S. Torkel, V. Rao, A. Maunder, E. Osei-Safo, S. Cowan, L.J. Moran
-
- Journal:
- Proceedings of the Nutrition Society / Volume 83 / Issue OCE1 / April 2024
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 07 May 2024, E81
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome PCOS is an endocrine disorder affecting 8 to 13% of reproductive aged women(1). Dietary and physical activity changes are the first-line therapy to assist with symptom and weight management and to reduce the risk of reproductive, metabolic and psychological comorbidities(2). However, women with PCOS have a higher weight, experience weight gain, and a higher prevalence of living in a larger body. Health care professionals (HCPs) play a crucial role in delivering diet and physical activity advice for people with PCOS. Thus, the aim of this systematic review is to understand the barriers, facilitators, experiences, and perceptions of engagement and compliance with diet and physical activity modifications in people with PCOS and in HCPs providing or referring people with PCOS to diet and physical activity modifications. A mixed-method systematic review was conducted with quantitative studies narratively synthesised and all studies thematically analysed. There were 68 eligible papers, including n = 59 (n = 5198) people with PCOS and n = 17 (n = 2,622) HCPs. Several themes were identified as impacting people with PCOS’ ability to make diet and physical activity changes. HCP education on PCOS management through diet and physical activity was viewed by HCPs and people with PCOS to be inadequate, further impacting the quality of care and health outcomes. Dietary and physical activity advice delivered by a multidisciplinary team, including dietitians, was identified as a key component for change. Both people with PCOS and HCPs agreed that there was a need for individualised and PCOS-specific diet and physical activity advice. However, HCPs viewed that there was limited evidence supporting these recommendations and a lack of time to deliver this care. Weight stigma was identified as impacting both those in larger and smaller bodies with PCOS, reducing the quality of care and affecting self-perception and mental health. People with PCOS perceived that diet and physical activity are overly focused on weight loss and fertility, independent of their own personal motivations and goals. Systemic changes, including receiving diet and physical activity advice that meet the individual’s needs, are necessary for leading to long-term sustainable changes and improvements in health outcomes. A multidisciplinary team approach and an overhaul of HCPs’ perceptions and mentality of weight and weight-centric care for those with PCOS are essential in delivering effective diet and physical activity advice.