GB
Skip to navigation
Skip to content

Elbridge Gerry's Salamander

The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution
  • Gary W. Cox, University of California, San Diego
  • Jonathan N. Katz, California Institute of Technology
  • Hardback
  • ISBN:9780521806756
  • Publication date:March 2002
  • 248pages
  • 7 b/w illus. 22 tables
    • Dimensions: 228 x 152 mm
    • Weight: 0.47kg
      59.0097805218067560GB0en_GBGBP£
    View other formats:

    The Supreme Court's reapportionment decisions, beginning with Baker v. Carr in 1962, had far more than jurisprudential consequences. They sparked a massive wave of extraordinary redistricting in the mid-1960s. Both state legislative and congressional districts were redrawn more comprehensively - by far - than at any previous time in America's history. Moreover, they changed what would happen at law should a state government fail to enact a new districting plan when one was legally required. This 2002 book provides a detailed analysis of how judicial partisanship affected redistricting outcomes in the 1960s, arguing that the reapportionment revolution led indirectly to three fundamental changes in the nature of congressional elections: the abrupt eradication of a 6% pro-Republican bias in the translation of congressional votes into seats outside the south; the abrupt increase in the apparent advantage of incumbents; and the abrupt alteration of the two parties' success in congressional recruitment and elections.

    Bookmark with:

    My Basket

    You have  in your basket.

    Subtotal: