Other available formats:
Looking for an examination copy?
If you are interested in the title for your course we can consider offering an examination copy. To register your interest please contact email@example.com providing details of the course you are teaching.
This book studies the struggle to enforce international human rights law in federal courts. In 1980, a federal appeals court ruled that a Paraguayan family could sue a Paraguayan official under the Alien Tort Statute – a dormant provision of the 1789 Judiciary Act – for torture committed in Paraguay. Since then, courts have been wrestling with this step toward a universal approach to human rights law. The book examines attempts by human rights groups to use the law to enforce human rights norms. It explains the separation of powers issues arising when victims sue the United States or when the United States intervenes to urge dismissal of a claim. Moreover, it analyzes the controversies arising from attempts to hold foreign nations, foreign officials, and corporations liable under international human rights law. While Davis’s analysis is driven by social science methods, its foundation is the dramatic human story from which these cases arise.Read more
- First comprehensive study of international human rights cases brought in U.S. courts under the Alien Tort Statute and Torture Victim Protection Act
- Will be compelling to scholars and students from numerous fields: human rights, American politics, U.S. foreign policy, interest groups, etc.
- Uses a mix of social science methods and legal analysis grounded in the extraordinary human stories from which these cases arise
Reviews & endorsements
"In Justice Across Borders, Jeffrey Davis makes an indispensable and innovative contribution to the study of human rights and the growing literature on international justice. Mixing detailed case studies with quantitative analysis, Davis reveals the transformative role of litigation in the search for justice. He also reminds us that individuals – from survivors of mass atrocities to the public interest lawyers who represent them – play an essential role in this search."
--William J. Aceves, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, California Western School of Law, and author of The Anatomy of Torture: A Documentary History of Filartiga v. Pena-Irala
See more reviews
"Justice Across Borders makes a tremendous contribution to the field of human rights. It moves beyond a strictly legalistic approach to human rights and exposes the full range of actors and the complex politics informing the development of human rights jurisprudence in U.S. courts. Well researched and tightly argued, the book offers particularly strong analysis of NGO involvement and executive branch involvement, and yet it deserves to be read from cover to cover by both students and practitioners seeking to understand the historical development of human rights claims in U.S. courts. The human rights field is moving towards increasing use of courts. Justice Across Borders will prove to be a useful text for years to come."
--Julie Mertus, Professor of Human Rights and co-director, Ethics, Peace & Global Affairs Program, American University
"A compelling account of how a little-known statute from 1789 spawned a human rights revolution, and a nuanced analysis of the forces that have driven -- and opposed -- that transformation."
--David Cole, Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center, author of Less Safe, Less Free: Why America Is Losing the War on Terror
"...extensive and anecdotal reports of the emotional responses of ATS plaintiffs and their lawyers, and of counsel for defendants as well, provides interesting historical context,..."
--Steven M. Schneebaum, The John Hopkins University, Human Rights & Human Welfare
"...an in-depth and fascinating examination of human rights litigation in American courts using the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) or Alien Tort Claims (ACTA)...a detailed, well-researched, carefully analyzed, and cogently argued book; it answers pivotal questions on how ATS has become a new tool in overcoming territorial limitations in pursuing international human rights violations very thoroughly and in a high readable and engaging manner...surely this book will make the reading list at several universities and draw the attention of those interested in human rights law and litigation."
--The Law and Politics Book Review, Srini Sitaraman, Government and International Relations, Clark University
Not yet reviewed
Be the first to review
Review was not posted due to profanity×
- Date Published: June 2008
- format: Hardback
- isbn: 9780521878173
- length: 318 pages
- dimensions: 235 x 158 x 22 mm
- weight: 0.54kg
- contains: 8 b/w illus. 29 tables
- availability: In stock
Table of Contents
1. The seeds of legal accountability
2. Competing forces in the struggle for accountability
3. Human rights entrepreneurs: NGOs and the ATS revolution
4. Separation of powers and human rights cases
5. No safe haven: human rights cases challenging foreign countries and nationals
6. Holding corporations accountable for human rights violations
7. Sorting through the ashes: testing findings and predictions through quantitative analysis
8. Impact and conclusion.
Instructors have used or reviewed this title for the following courses
- Comparative Human Rights
- Graduate Seminar in Judicial Politics (and possibly others)
- Human Rights
- Judicial Decision-Making
- Legal Process
- Politics & the Media
- Supreme Court News Coverage
Sorry, this resource is locked
Please register or sign in to request access. If you are having problems accessing these resources please email firstname.lastname@example.orgRegister Sign in
You are now leaving the Cambridge University Press website. Your eBook purchase and download will be completed by our partner www.ebooks.com. Please see the permission section of the www.ebooks.com catalogue page for details of the print & copy limits on our eBooks.Continue ×