List price $33.99
Other available formats:
Looking for an examination copy?
This title is not currently available for examination. However, if you are interested in the title for your course we can consider offering an examination copy. To register your interest please contact email@example.com providing details of the course you are teaching.
Why do international criminal tribunals write histories of the origins and causes of armed conflicts? Richard Ashby Wilson conducted empirical research with judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and expert witnesses in three international criminal tribunals to understand how law and history are combined in the courtroom. Historical testimony is now an integral part of international trials, with prosecutors and defense teams using background testimony to pursue decidedly legal objectives. Both use historical narratives to frame the alleged crimes and to articulate their side's theory of the case. In the Slobodan Milošević trial, the prosecution sought to demonstrate special intent to commit genocide by reference to a long-standing animus, nurtured within a nationalist mind-set. For their part, the defense calls historical witnesses to undermine charges of superior responsibility, and to mitigate the sentence by representing crimes as reprisals. Although legal ways of knowing are distinctive from those of history, the two are effectively combined in international trials in a way that challenges us to rethink the relationship between law and history.Read more
- Contains candid, revealing interviews with leading figures in the most important international criminal trials of the last 50 years
- First ever survey of attitudes of tribunal staff
- Bridges the academic versus policy divide with innovative social science research combined with policy recommendations
Reviews & endorsements
"How well do international criminal courts craft historical understandings of genocide, massacre and other grave violations of human rights? And how well do recent efforts to highlight such traumatic history in international trials promote sound judicial outcomes? These questions not only torment survivors, but should preoccupy everyone concerned with the cause of international criminal justice. Bringing to these issues the skills of a legal anthropologist, a learned appreciation of international humanitarian law and a refined legal sensibility, Richard Wilson provides answers based on path breaking new research. The first full-dress examination of this topic, this is a splendid book that should dominate the discussion of this important topic."
Michael R. Marrus
Chancellor Rose and Ray Wolfe Professor Emeritus of Holocaust Studies, University of TorontoSee more reviews
"International criminal trials contribute to our understanding of past events, whether it be the aggressive war launched by Nazi Germany and Japan, the breakup of Yugoslavia and the Rwandan genocide. The narrative often emerges from the tough questioning of academic historians by skilled barristers and judges. Richard Wilson provides us with the definitive study of the subject in this finely researched and written volume."
National University of Ireland, Galway
"Perhaps it is inevitable for trials for major crimes of the recent past – in international as well as domestic jurisdictions – to address interpretations of history, but a courtroom is not the best setting for such an endeavor, especially when the events are still fresh in the memory of contemporaries. On the other hand, justice cannot and should not be blind to the historical context in which these momentous crimes have been committed. Richard Ashby Wilson presents the complexities and nuances of this dilemma with historical rigor but also with sympathy for the predicament of judges, prosecutors and defense counsel. Trials cannot settle conflicting interpretations of history nor should they be expected to do so. If properly managed within their own rules, they can however limit the scope of impermissible lies about those events. This book will prove to be a major contribution to that end."
Juan E Méndez
UN Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
"This book... is not simply an academic analysis of historical claims in international criminal trials, although it is that too. More significantly, it is an examination of how seemingly extra-legal concerns become a necessary part of legal practice. Given that international criminal trials can never be simply about international criminal law, the book examines what is lost and what is gained when historical claims enter the picture. This is an issue of great interest for anyone interested in the principles of due process, as well as the relative justice of international criminal law."
Journal of Human Rights Practice
Be the first to review this book
- Date Published: March 2011
- format: Paperback
- isbn: 9780521138314
- length: 272 pages
- dimensions: 226 x 153 x 15 mm
- weight: 0.37kg
- contains: 8 b/w illus. 2 tables
- availability: In stock
Table of Contents
1. Assessing court histories of mass crimes
2. What does the 'international' actually mean for international criminal trials?
3. Contrasting evidence: international and common law approaches to expert testimony
4. Does history have any legal relevance in international criminal trials?
5. From monumental history to micro-histories
6. Exoneration and mitigation in defense histories
7. Misjudging Rwandan society and history at the international criminal tribunal for Rwanda
8. Permanent justice: the international criminal court
9. Conclusion: new directions in international criminal trials.
You are now leaving the Cambridge University Press website, your eBook purchase and download will be completed by our partner www.ebooks.com. Please see the permission section of the www.ebooks.com catalogue page for details of the print & copy limits on our eBooks.Continue ×