Looking for an examination copy?
If you are interested in the title for your course we can consider offering an examination copy. To register your interest please contact email@example.com providing details of the course you are teaching.
Neil Duxbury examines how precedents constrain legal decision-makers and how legal decision-makers relax and avoid those constraints. There is no single principle or theory which explains the authority of precedent but rather a number of arguments which raise rebuttable presumptions in favour of precedent-following. This book examines the force and the limitations of these arguments and shows that although the principal requirement of the doctrine of precedent is that courts respect earlier judicial decisions on materially identical facts, the doctrine also requires courts to depart from such decisions when following them would perpetuate legal error or injustice. Not only do judicial precedents not 'bind' judges in the classical-positivist sense, but, were they to do so, they would be ill suited to common-law decision-making. Combining historical inquiry and philosophical analysis, this book will assist anyone seeking to understand how precedent operates as a common-law doctrine.Read more
- The detailed study of a key common-law concept makes this a valuable core law text
- Written with undergraduate and postgraduate law courses in mind
- Huge relevance to academic lawyers, barristers and judges within all common-law jurisdictions
Reviews & endorsements
"...For the American reader concerned with precedent in constitutional law, there is much food for thought..."
--Matthew J. Franck, Radford University; Visiting Fellow, Princeton University, The Law and Politics Book Review
Not yet reviewed
Be the first to review
Review was not posted due to profanity×
- Date Published: June 2008
- format: Paperback
- isbn: 9780521713368
- length: 224 pages
- dimensions: 227 x 152 x 13 mm
- weight: 0.35kg
- availability: In stock
Table of Contents
Part I. Introduction - The Usable Past:
2. Positivism and precedent
3. A theory of precedent?
Part II. Why Does English Law Have a Doctrine of Precedent?:
4. The formation of a doctrine of precedent
Part III. Precedents as Reasons:
5. Looking for a certain ratio
6. Shortcuts to reason
7. Pre-emptive precedent?
Part IV. Distinguishing, Overruling and the Problem of Self-Reference:
11. The power to overrule oneself
12. The authority of the Practice Statement
Part V. Why Follow Precedent?:
13. Consequentialist justifications
14. Deontological arguments
Sorry, this resource is locked
Please register or sign in to request access. If you are having problems accessing these resources please email firstname.lastname@example.orgRegister Sign in
You are now leaving the Cambridge University Press website, your eBook purchase and download will be completed by our partner www.ebooks.com. Please see the permission section of the www.ebooks.com catalogue page for details of the print & copy limits on our eBooks.Continue ×