Looking for an examination copy?
This title is not currently available for examination. However, if you are interested in the title for your course we can consider offering an examination copy. To register your interest please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details of the course you are teaching.
In this important new book, Michael J. Perry examines three of the most disputed constitutional issues of our time: capital punishment, state laws banning abortion, and state policies denying the benefit of law to same-sex unions. The author, a leading constitutional scholar, explains that if a majority of the justices of the Supreme Court believes that a law violates the Constitution, it does not necessarily follow that the Court should rule that the law is unconstitutional. In cases in which it is argued that a law violates the Constitution, the Supreme Court must decide which of two importantly different questions it should address: (1) Is the challenged law unconstitutional? (2) Is the lawmakers' judgment that the challenged law is constitutional a reasonable judgment? (One can answer both questions in the affirmative.) By focusing on the death penalty, abortion, and same-sex unions, Perry provides illuminating new perspectives not only on moral controversies that implicate one or more constitutionally entrenched human rights, but also on the fundamental question of the Supreme Court's proper role in adjudicating such controversies.Read more
- Examines the death penalty, abortion and same-sex unions
- In doing so explores three of the most controversial constitutional issues
- Asks what the Supreme Court's role should be in these controversies
Be the first to review this book
- Date Published: December 2010
- format: Paperback
- isbn: 9780521184410
- length: 266 pages
- dimensions: 216 x 140 x 15 mm
- weight: 0.34kg
- availability: Manufactured on demand: supplied direct from the printer
Table of Contents
Introduction: a partial theory of judicial review
1. Human rights: from morality to constitutional law
2. Constitutionally entrenched human rights, the Supreme Court, and Thayerian deference
3. Capital punishment
4. Same-sex unions
6. Thayerian deference revisited
Postscript: religion as a basis of lawmaking?
You are now leaving the Cambridge University Press website, your eBook purchase and download will be completed by our partner www.ebooks.com. Please see the permission section of the www.ebooks.com catalogue page for details of the print & copy limits on our eBooks.Continue ×