Looking for an examination copy?
If you are interested in the title for your course we can consider offering an examination copy. To register your interest please contact [email protected] providing details of the course you are teaching.
Before Supreme Court nominees are allowed take their place on the high Court, they must face a moment of democratic reckoning by appearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Despite the potential this holds for public input into the direction of legal change, the hearings are routinely derided as nothing but empty rituals and political grandstanding. In this book, Paul M. Collins, Jr., and Lori A. Ringhand present a contrarian view that uses both empirical data and stories culled from more than seventy years of transcripts to demonstrate that the hearings are a democratic forum for the discussion and ratification of constitutional change. As such, they are one of the ways in which “We the People” take ownership of the Constitution by examining the core constitutional values of those permitted to interpret it on our behalf.Read more
- Provides the most comprehensive examination ever undertaken of the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings of Supreme Court nominees
- Marries cutting-edge normative constitutional scholarship with quantitative and historical research on confirmation politics to develop a novel theory of the role of confirmation hearings and constitutional change
- Makes use of more than 70 years of stories culled from confirmation hearing transcripts to vividly illustrate how American history, social change and constitutional development are both reflected in and influence the confirmation process
Reviews & endorsements
"Conventional wisdom suggests that confirmation hearings of the Supreme Court justices before the Senate Judiciary Committee are broken, but Collins and Ringhand present a sophisticated, empirically grounded argument that suggests that they are not … This book is a game changer. Summing up: highly recommended."
J. R. Vile, ChoiceSee more reviews
"… Collins and Ringhand's Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings and Constitutional Change is an important addition to the literature on Supreme Court selection politics generally and the most important study available on confirmation hearings per se. More generally, and at least as importantly, it carries important messages about the interface between confirmation politics and democratic theory, ones that have certainly changed the way I will view and evaluate Supreme Court confirmation hearings past and future."
Elliot E. Slotnick, Law and Politics Book Review
Not yet reviewed
Be the first to review
Review was not posted due to profanity×
- Date Published: June 2015
- format: Paperback
- isbn: 9781107502659
- length: 314 pages
- dimensions: 229 x 152 x 17 mm
- weight: 0.42kg
- contains: 20 b/w illus. 14 tables
- availability: Available
Table of Contents
1. A confirmation process worth celebrating
2. How it works: the nuts and bolts of the confirmation process
3. Public opinion and precedent at confirmation hearings
4. An issue-by-issue look at the hearings
5. The discussion of precedent at the hearings
6. Confirmation conditions
7. The 104th justice
8. Currently contested constitutional questions
9. Our Constitution.
Sorry, this resource is locked
Please register or sign in to request access. If you are having problems accessing these resources please email [email protected]Register Sign in
You are now leaving the Cambridge University Press website. Your eBook purchase and download will be completed by our partner www.ebooks.com. Please see the permission section of the www.ebooks.com catalogue page for details of the print & copy limits on our eBooks.Continue ×