Looking for an examination copy?
If you are interested in the title for your course we can consider offering an examination copy. To register your interest please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details of the course you are teaching.
In recent years, the ontological argument and theistic metaphysics have been criticised by philosophers working in both the analytic and continental traditions. Responses to these criticisms have primarily come from philosophers who make use of the traditional, and problematic, concept of God. In this 2006 volume, Daniel A. Dombrowski defends the ontological argument against its contemporary critics, but he does so by using a neoclassical or process concept of God, thereby strengthening the case for a contemporary theistic metaphysics. Relying on the thought of Charles Hartshorne, he builds on Hartshorne's crucial distinction between divine existence and divine actuality, which enables neoclassical defenders of the ontological argument to avoid the familiar criticism that the argument moves illegitimately from an abstract concept to concrete reality. His argument, thus, avoids the problems inherent in the traditional concept of God as static.Read more
- Defends a contemporary version of the ontological argument for the existence of God
- Deals with philosophers of religion in both analytic philosophy and continental philosophy
- Relies on neoclassical or process theism, thereby avoiding problems in the traditional concept of God as static
Not yet reviewed
Be the first to review
Review was not posted due to profanity×
- Date Published: May 2006
- format: Hardback
- isbn: 9780521863698
- length: 180 pages
- dimensions: 233 x 157 x 21 mm
- weight: 0.384kg
- availability: In stock
Table of Contents
1. Historical background
2. Poetry v. the ontological argument: Richard Rorty's challenge
3. Deconstructionism and the ontological argument: the case of Mark Taylor
4. Is the ontological argument worthless?: Graham Oppy's rejection
5. Oppy, perfect islands, and existence as a predicate
6. Rival concepts of God and the ontological argument: Thomas Morris, Katherin Rogers and Alvin Plantinga.
You are now leaving the Cambridge University Press website, your eBook purchase and download will be completed by our partner www.ebooks.com. Please see the permission section of the www.ebooks.com catalogue page for details of the print & copy limits on our eBooks.Continue ×