Looking for an examination copy?
If you are interested in the title for your course we can consider offering an examination copy. To register your interest please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details of the course you are teaching.
Why do some political leaders create and strengthen institutions like title registries and land tribunals that secure property rights to land while others neglect these institutions or destroy those that already exist? How do these institutions evolve once they have been established? This book answers these questions through spatial and temporal comparison of national and subnational cases from Botswana, Ghana, and Kenya and, to a lesser extent, Zimbabwe. Onoma argues that the level of property rights security that leaders prefer depends on how they use land. However, the extent to which leaders’ institutional preferences are translated into actual institutions depends on the level of leaders’ capacity. Further, once established, these institutions through their very working can contribute to their own decline over time. This book is unique in revealing the political and economic reasons why some leaders unlike others prefer an environment of insecure rights even as land prices increase.Read more
- Combines explanations of institutional choice and institutional change, addressing both property rights and historical institutionalism
- Employs qualitative research methods, combining temporal with spatial analysis and national with subnational units of analysis.
- Provides an original theory on the topic of land policy that questions conventional wisdom and conclusions by previous scholars
Not yet reviewed
Be the first to review
Review was not posted due to profanity×
- Date Published: December 2009
- format: Hardback
- isbn: 9780521765718
- length: 246 pages
- dimensions: 235 x 160 x 20 mm
- weight: 0.48kg
- contains: 3 maps 3 tables
- availability: In stock
Table of Contents
1. Divergent attitudes towards property rights institutions
2. Explaining institutional choice and change
3. Varying responses by Ghanian and Batswanaian state leaders
4. Traditional leaders take charge in Akyem Abuakwa and Ga
5. Making and then unmaking institutions in Kenya
6. Endogenous contributions to institutional change
Appendix: notes on field research.
Sorry, this resource is locked
Please register or sign in to request access. If you are having problems accessing these resources please email email@example.comRegister Sign in
You are now leaving the Cambridge University Press website. Your eBook purchase and download will be completed by our partner www.ebooks.com. Please see the permission section of the www.ebooks.com catalogue page for details of the print & copy limits on our eBooks.Continue ×