Skip to content

Your Cart


You have 0 items in your cart.

Register Sign in Wishlist
Unmaking China's Development

Unmaking China's Development
The Function and Credibility of Institutions

$99.99 (C)

  • Author: Peter Ho, Tsinghua University, Beijing and Technische Universiteit Delft, The Netherlands
  • Date Published: November 2017
  • availability: In stock
  • format: Hardback
  • isbn: 9781107094109

$ 99.99 (C)

Add to cart Add to wishlist

Other available formats:

Looking for an examination copy?

If you are interested in the title for your course we can consider offering an examination copy. To register your interest please contact providing details of the course you are teaching.

Product filter button
About the Authors
  • Why would the removal of authoritarian institutions in some developing countries lead to sustained socio-economic crisis, while others experience explosive growth despite 'persisting' informal, insecure and rent-seeking institutional arrangements? A key to solving this enigma lies in understanding China, a country where the paradoxes of development are highly visible. Peter Ho argues that understanding China's economy necessitates an analytical refocusing from Form to Function, detached from normative assumptions about institutional appearance and developing instead a 'Credibility Thesis'. In this reading, once institutions endogenously emerge and persist through actors' conflicting interactions, they are credible. Ho develops this idea theoretically, methodologically, and empirically by examining institutions around the sector that propelled, yet, simultaneously destabilizes development: real estate - land, housing and natural resources. Ho shows how this sector can further both our understanding of institutions and issues of capital, labor, infrastructure and technology.

    • Provides an alternative theoretical explanation for China's development
    • Proposes a new methodology to analyze institutions and their role in economic growth
    • Posits critical, new concepts in relation to credibility, function and dynamic disequilibrium
    Read more

    Reviews & endorsements

    Advance praise: ‘Successful development on the ground often confounds formal development theory. This is especially the case with neo-liberal views that secure property rights are crucial for successful outcomes. Peter Ho challenges this view with his important study of land in China in all its forms, uses and abuses. Despite the absence of the necessary infrastructure proposed by neo-liberal theories, China has witnessed dramatic growth, while other nations that have this infrastructure have faltered or failed to produce the expected outcomes. Ho's detailed study … provides the reader with a wealth of stimulating challenges. Ho suggests that we concentrate on the function of institutions (their credibility) rather than the form. This is an important book that challenges many commonly held assumptions about what works in development. It should be read not only by those interested in China's economic trajectory but also by anyone interested in development theory and the reality of development in real places and in real time.' Tony Saich, Daewoo Professor of International Affairs, Harvard University

    Advance praise: ‘Mainstream economics is of little use in understanding China's economic transitions since the late 1980s. … Peter Ho is one of very few scholars capable of explaining the Chinese economy as it is rather than as western economists imagine – or wish – it to be. We have here a profound blending of conceptual clarity and empirical detail. Attention must be paid to this message.' Daniel W. Bromley, Anderson-Bascom Professor of applied economics, University of Wisconsin, Madison

    Advance praise: ‘Ho makes a bold argument that the key to understanding the Chinese developmental enigma lies in the distinction between form and function of institutions and the credibility of institutions … The ‘Credibility Thesis' effectively articulated here is inspirational, innovative, and provocative with great potentials to advance theoretical inquiry into the intriguing nature of China's developmental model in a rapidly changing world.' George C. S. Lin, The University of Hong Kong

    Advance praise: ‘Peter Ho … raises a profound question about the ‘credibility' of land institution. In Unmaking China's Development, he investigates actually-existing messy land property rights in rural and urban China. The book not only illuminates complex land and housing issues but also provides highly insightful reflections on economic theories of property rights.' Fulong Wu, Bartlett Professor of Planning , University College London

    Advance praise: ‘Peter Ho is a leading theorist of China's contemporary property rights. Based on rich empirical data and rigorous theoretical framing, this book successfully delineates the transformation and consolidation of China's land rights regimes in the past half a century, and offers new insight that convincingly defies existing explanatory models.' You-tien Hsing, Pamela P. Fong Family Distinguished Chair in China Studies, University of California, Berkeley

    Advance praise: ‘Academics and activists interested in and working on the broad themes of politics and development, rural and urban issues in various parts of the world must read Unmaking China's Development by Peter Ho. It is a brilliant book that looks into the centrality of institutions in political and development processes, and successfully poses a highly original theoretical and methodological approach for the standard narratives on this subject.' Saturnino M. Borras, Jr, International Institute of Social Studies (ISS), The Netherlands

    Advance praise: ‘Peter Ho has long been recognized among scholars as the leading authority on Chinese land issues. In this conceptually sophisticated book he explores both the urban and rural institutional underpinnings of landholdings and examines a conundrum: why China has experienced high levels of investment in property despite a system of insecure property rights. His book not only illuminates China's economic development but also successfully challenges long-held neo-liberal assumptions in the social sciences.' Jonathan Unger, Editor of The China Journal

    Advance praise: ‘Focused on the vicissitudes of real estate institutions, Peter Ho's new book offers us a penetrating book into the political economy of Chinese development and raises profound questions about the politics of development in general. This is a book brimming with insights and provocations.' Dali Yang, William Claude Reavis Professor, University of Chicago

    Advance praise: ‘Peter Ho skilfully provides a ground-breaking study of the political institutions underlying economic development in China. A must-read for scholars of international development and a rich and informative analysis of China. … Scholars of economic development cannot ignore China. Peter Ho's rich and informative book provides ground-breaking analysis of political institutions underlying China's growth. It should be read by anyone interested in economic development policy and China.' Tim Forsyth, London School of Economics and Political Science

    Advance praise: ‘This is an excellent scholarly work. It combines a wide-ranging literature search with detailed fieldwork in China … in an attempt to answer broad theoretical questions. The empirical work and theoretical underpinnings are astoundingly detailed.' Richard Louis Edmonds, University of Chicago

    Advance praise: ‘This is an important book on many dimensions. Peter Ho draws on his extensive empirical research in China to construct a convincing and highly original theory challenging the basic neo-liberal assumption that clear, formal property rights are a necessary precondition for development. Ho points out that the fifth of the world's population living in China experienced the largest economic boom in history with murky and ambiguous ownership rules. He argues that persistence of institutions shows they perform useful functions and are credible. … Ho's conclusions call into question the many costly efforts by international organizations and national governments (including China) to clarify ownership rules. They demand a new, more culturally sensitive approach to harmonizing informal belief systems and ambiguous, but credible, property rights systems.' Richard LeGates, Summit Professor of Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai

    See more reviews

    Customer reviews

    Not yet reviewed

    Be the first to review

    Review was not posted due to profanity


    , create a review

    (If you're not , sign out)

    Please enter the right captcha value
    Please enter a star rating.
    Your review must be a minimum of 12 words.

    How do you rate this item?


    Product details

    • Date Published: November 2017
    • format: Hardback
    • isbn: 9781107094109
    • length: 336 pages
    • dimensions: 235 x 156 x 22 mm
    • weight: 0.59kg
    • availability: In stock
  • Table of Contents

    Introduction: an archaeology of institutions
    1. Institutional change in China's development: myths of tenure security and titling
    2. In defense of endogenous development: urban and rural land markets
    3. The 'Credibility Thesis' and its application to property rights
    4. A theorem on dynamic disequilibrium: debunking path dependence and equilibrium
    5. Understanding informality and insecurity: empiricism as basis for institutionalism
    6. Making and unmaking the property bubble: boom, bust and unintended welfare?
    7. Empty institutions, non-credibility and power: the grazing ban and mining
    Conclusion: theoretical implications for capital, labor and beyond.

  • Author

    Peter Ho, Tsinghua University, Beijing and Technische Universiteit Delft, The Netherlands
    Peter Ho is Full Professor at Tsinghua University and Technische Universiteit Delft, The Netherlands. Ho is interested in the revision of Western theories of development and uses China as a case. He is fellow of China's prestigious 1000 Talents' Scheme, received the Consolidator Grant by the European Research Council, and was awarded the EAEPE Kapp Prize.

Sign In

Please sign in to access your account


Not already registered? Create an account now. ×

Sorry, this resource is locked

Please register or sign in to request access. If you are having problems accessing these resources please email

Register Sign in
Please note that this file is password protected. You will be asked to input your password on the next screen.

» Proceed

You are now leaving the Cambridge University Press website. Your eBook purchase and download will be completed by our partner Please see the permission section of the catalogue page for details of the print & copy limits on our eBooks.

Continue ×

Continue ×

Continue ×

Find content that relates to you

This site uses cookies to improve your experience. Read more Close

Are you sure you want to delete your account?

This cannot be undone.


Thank you for your feedback which will help us improve our service.

If you requested a response, we will make sure to get back to you shortly.

Please fill in the required fields in your feedback submission.