Skip to content
Open global navigation

Cambridge University Press

AcademicLocation selectorSearch toggleMain navigation toggle
Cart
Register Sign in Wishlist
Legalizing Gender Inequality

Legalizing Gender Inequality
Courts, Markets and Unequal Pay for Women in America

$39.99

Part of Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences

  • Date Published: May 1999
  • availability: Available
  • format: Paperback
  • isbn: 9780521627504

$39.99
Paperback

Add to cart Add to wishlist

Other available formats:
Hardback, eBook


Looking for an examination copy?

If you are interested in the title for your course we can consider offering an examination copy. To register your interest please contact collegesales@cambridge.org providing details of the course you are teaching.

Description
Product filter button
Description
Contents
Resources
Courses
About the Authors
  • Based on case studies of four organizations that were sued for pay discrimination, Legalizing Gender Inequality challenges existing theories of gender inequality within economic, sociological, and legal contexts. The book argues that male-female earnings differentials cannot be explained adequately by market forces, principles of efficiency, or society-wide sexism. Rather it suggests that employing organizations tend to disadvantage holders of predominantly female jobs by denying them power in organizational politics and reproducing male cultural advantages. The book argues that the courts have, by uncritically accepting the market explanation for wage disparity, tended to legitimate and to legalize a crucial dimension of gender inequality.

    • Creative use of litigation data
    • Synthesis of legal and empirical analysis
    • Alternative view of the courts as sources of ideology
    Read more

    Reviews & endorsements

    "Legalizing Gender Inequality presents a new organization-centered paradigm for understanding gender-differentials in pay, which promises to turn on its head standard thinking about the relationship between law, markets, and organizations. By offering important new insights into pay equity, gender relations in the workplace, and organization-market relations, Nelson and Bridges make significant contributions to the sociological literatures on gender, law, and organizations." Lauren Edelman, University of California, Berkeley

    "Legalizing Gender Inequality provides a truly pathbreaking analysis of how organizations produce pay disparities between the sexes and how the courts legitimate them. Nelson and Bridges' superb scholarship, cogent logic, and accessible style make this book a winner." Barbara Reskin, Harvard University

    "Equal Pay for equal work' is a central tenet of our civil rights law, but the principle of 'comparable pay for comparable work' is recognized neither by law nor in the public consciousness. This means on the ground that between-job gender inequality is currently unregulated, because employers have convinced courts that 'the market made us' pay female-dominated jobs less than male-dominated jobs. Legalizing Gender Inequality persuasively refutes this strong-form market-based defense. In penetrating and clear-eyed fashion, the authors re-analyze the four crucial cases that flirted with the possiblity of comparable worth." Ian Ayres, Yale University

    "But instead of merely trashing the market, this book concludes that inequality can be produced under pay systems based on either comparable worth or market principles. Rather than using comparable pay as the sole remedy for gender inequality, the authors suggest procedural reforms to improve organizational politics and even consider harnessing the transformative energies of the market. In short, this book eschews the reifying choice between market and non-market forces as causes of inequality and instead develops a more comprehensive organizational theory which better fits the facts which the authors have so painstakingly unearthed." Ian Ayres, Yale University

    "...a well-written book about an important topic that is well-argued and empirically grounded." Sara C. Benesh, The Law and Politics Book Review

    "The authors raise new questions for theory and research about pay equity." Patti A. Giuffre, Social Forces

    "...an unusual and creative approach." Law & Social Inquiry

    "The authors are otherwise will qualified to tackle the issue of pay equity. Their findings constitute significant contributions to the field. Graduate students and faculty who focus on complex organizations and pay discrimination issues and plaintiff lawyers will appreciate this book." Gender & Society

    "Legalizing Gender Inequality is one of the best recent efforts I have seen to address and analyze policies aimed at achieving gender equailty in paid work." Qualitative Sociology

    "Legalizing Gender Equality is essential reading for scholars of social inequality, gender, and sociology of law. The books breaks new ground in a highly polarized debate over pay equity. The results of this compelling study testify to the importantce of mapping variations in gender inequality across different market and organizational contexts." American Journal of Sociology

    See more reviews

    Customer reviews

    Not yet reviewed

    Be the first to review

    Review was not posted due to profanity

    ×

    , create a review

    (If you're not , sign out)

    Please enter the right captcha value
    Please enter a star rating.
    Your review must be a minimum of 12 words.

    How do you rate this item?

    ×

    Product details

    • Date Published: May 1999
    • format: Paperback
    • isbn: 9780521627504
    • length: 412 pages
    • dimensions: 229 x 152 x 21 mm
    • weight: 0.55kg
    • contains: 10 b/w illus. 35 tables
    • availability: Available
  • Table of Contents

    List of figures and tables
    Acknowledgements
    1. Law, markets, and the institutional construction of gender inequality in pay
    Part I. Theory and Method:
    2. Legal theories of sex-based pay discrimination
    3. Toward an organizational theory of gender inequality in pay
    4. Methodological approach: law cases, case studies, and critical empiricism
    Part II. The Case Studies. Section A. Public Sector Organizations:
    5. Paternalism and politics in a university pay system: Christensen v. State of Iowa
    6. Bureaucratic politics and gender inequality in a state pay system: AFSCME v. State of Washington
    Section B. Private Sector Organizations:
    7. Corporate politics, rationalization, and managerial discretion: EEOC v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
    8. The financial institution as a male, profit-making club: Glass v. Coastal Bank
    Part III. Conclusion: Legalizing Gender Inequality:
    9. Rethinking the relationship between law, markets, and gender inequality in organizations
    Appendix: court documents and case materials used in case studies
    References
    Index.

  • Authors

    Robert L. Nelson, American Bar Foundation Chicago and Northwestern University, Illinois

    William P. Bridges, University of Illinois, Chicago

Sign In

Please sign in to access your account

Cancel

Not already registered? Create an account now. ×

Sorry, this resource is locked

Please register or sign in to request access. If you are having problems accessing these resources please email cflack@cambridge.org

Register Sign in
Please note that an additional password is required to open the solutions file once you have downloaded it. Contact collegesales@cambridge.org for this password.

» Proceed

You are now leaving the Cambridge University Press website, your eBook purchase and download will be completed by our partner www.ebooks.com. Please see the permission section of the www.ebooks.com catalogue page for details of the print & copy limits on our eBooks.

Continue ×

Continue ×

Find content that relates to you

© Cambridge University Press 2014

Back to top

Are you sure you want to delete your account?

This cannot be undone.

Cancel Delete

Thank you for your feedback which will help us improve our service.

If you requested a response, we will make sure to get back to you shortly.

×
Please fill in the required fields in your feedback submission.
×