Cambridge
Account MaintenanceSearchView basketOrdering Help
 
Introduction
Table of Contents
color map of
El Salvador
map of Usulután
Figure 1.1
Figure 1.2
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.3
Figure 3.4
Figure 3.5
Figure 3.6
Figure 3.7
Figure 3.9
Figure 7.4
Figure 7.5
cover image
black and white photographs
More about author
Purchase

Epilogue

Legacies of an Agrarian Insurgency

 
We shed blood all these years in order to buy land at market prices?

–Campesino activist, Tierra Blanca, 1992
In the course of El Salvador’s civil war, insurgent campesinos redrew boundaries of class, culture, and citizenship. By the end of the war, insurgent cooperatives occupied about a third of Usulután’s farmland. While desperately poor, insurgent campesinos in most of the case-study areas enjoyed an unprecedented autonomy from landlords and traditional authorities. They participated in a dense network of insurgent organizations that defended land occupations against the return of the landlords. The settlement which ended the civil war between the two parties was a democratic political bargain: in exchange for laying down their arms and abandoning their socialist objectives, the insurgent organization joined the polity, which was to be reformed along liberal democratic lines. Over the next several years, the provisions of the agreement were generally carried out, including the first inclusive, democratic elections in 1994, despite resistance on the part of the government to the implementation of some aspects of the agreement. That positive outcome required an extended process of negotiations and ongoing pressure on government officials (and to a lesser extent on the FMLN) by the United Nations in its role as observer and verifier of the peace agreement and donor countries in their capacity as funders of reforms. Since 1994, elections have been held regularly and the FMLN has garnered an increasing share of political power, becoming the leading party in the national legislature in the 2000 elections. The required reforms to military, police, judicial, and electoral institutions have been carried out to a significant degree. And in some areas of the countryside, an unprecedented civil society continues actively to pursues campesino interests.

In this brief epilogue, I discuss the legacy of the war for the rural poor of El Salvador, with particular attention to the case-study areas. What are the legacies of the war-time process of mobilization and organization for the post-war period? Is there evidence that the new patterns of participation and citizenship endure in postwar El Salvador?

Chapter
 
  Preface
  1
2
3
4
5
6
  7
  8
  Epilogue